skip to main content
10.1145/1367497.1367520acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Externalities in online advertising

Published:21 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most models for online advertising assume that an advertiser's value from winning an ad auction, which depends on the clickthrough rate or conversion rate of the advertisement, is independent of other advertisements served alongside it in the same session. This ignores an important 'externality effect': as the advertising audience has a limited attention span, a high-quality ad on a page can detract attention from other ads on the same page. That is, the utility to a winner in such an auction also depends on the set of other winners.

In this paper, we introduce the problem of modeling externalities in online advertising, and study the winner determination problem in these models. Our models are based on choice models on the audience side. We show that in the most general case, the winner determination problem is hard even to approximate. However, we give an approximation algorithm for this problem with an approximation factor that is logarithmic in the ratio of the maximum to the minimum bid. Furthermore, we show that there are some interesting special cases, such as the case where the audience preferences are single peaked, where the problem can be solved exactly in polynomial time. For all these algorithms, we prove that the winner determination algorithm can be combined with VCG-style payments to yield truthful mechanisms.

References

  1. Aaron Archer and Eva Tardos. Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 482--491, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ning Chen, Nicole Immorlica, Anna Karlin, Mohammad Mahdian, and Atri Rudra. Approximating matches made in heaven. in preparation, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. Gaertner. Domain restrictions. In K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura, editors, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, volume I, chapter 3, pages 131--170. Elsevier Science, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Z. K. Hansen and M. Law. The political economy of truth-in-advertising regulation in the progressive era. Forthcoming at the Journal of Law and Economics. An earlier version is available as NBER Working Paper No. 11927, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Philippe Jehiel and Benny Moldovanu. Strategic non-participation. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1):84--98, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Philippe Jehiel and Benny Moldovanu. Efficient design with interdependent valuations. Econometrica, 69(5):1237--59, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Philippe Jehiel, Benny Moldovanu, and E. Stacchetti. How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. American Economic Review, 86(4):814--829, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Philippe Jehiel, Benny Moldovanu, and E. Stacchetti. Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities. Journal of Economic Theory, 85(2):258--294, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. Joachims, L. Granka, Bing Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), April 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Anshul Kothari, David C. Parkes, and Subhash Suri. Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multiunit auctions. Decision Support Systems, 39(1):105--121, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Internet Advertising Bureau. Online lead generation: Standards and guidelines. http://www.iab.net/standards/lead_generation.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. PricewaterhouseCoopers. IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, 2006 Full-Year Results. available at http://www.iab.net/resources/adrevenue/pdf/IAB_PwC_2006_Final.pdf, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Sprumont. The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica, 59(2):509--519, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Håstad. Clique is hard to approximate within n 1-ε. Acta Mathematica, 182:105--142, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Vijay V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Xiaojin Zhu, Andrew Goldberg, Jurgen Van Gael, and David Andrzejewski. Improving diversity in ranking using absorbing random walks. In Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-HLT), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Externalities in online advertising

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '08: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
        April 2008
        1326 pages
        ISBN:9781605580852
        DOI:10.1145/1367497

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 April 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader