skip to main content
10.1145/1772690.1772729acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expressive auctions for externalities in online advertising

Published:26 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

When online ads are shown together, they compete for user attention and conversions, imposing negative externalities on each other. While the competition for user attention in sponsored search can be captured via models of clickthrough rates, the post-click competition for conversions cannot: since the value-per-click of an advertiser is proportional to the conversion probability conditional on a click, which depends on the other ads displayed, the private value of an advertiser is no longer one-dimensional, and the GSP mechanism is not adequately expressive. We study the design of expressive GSP-like mechanisms for the simplest form that an advertiser's private value can have in the presence of such externalities- an advertiser's value depends on exclusivity, i.e., whether her ad is shown exclusively, or along with other ads.

Our auctions take as input two-dimensional (per-click) bids for exclusive and nonexclusive display, and have two types of outcomes: either a single ad is displayed exclusively, or multiple ads are simultaneously shown. We design two expressive auctions that are both extensions of GSP- the first auction, GSP2D, is designed with the property that the allocation and pricing are identical to GSP when multiple ads are shown; the second auction, NP2D, is designed to be a next price auction. We show that both auctions have high efficiency and revenue in all reasonable equilibria; further, the NP2D auction is guaranteed to always have an equilibrium with revenue at least as much as the current GSP mechanism. However, we find that unlike with one-dimensional valuations, the GSP-like auctions for these richer valuations do not always preserve efficiency and revenue with respect to the VCG mechanism.

References

  1. Abrams, Z., Ghosh, A., and Vee, E. Cost of conciseness in sponsored search auctions. In WINE '07: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007), Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aggarwal, G., Feldman, J., and Muthukrishnan, S. Bidding to the top: VCG and equilibria of position-based auctions. In WAOA'06: Proc. Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aggarwal, G., Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S., and Pal, M. Sponsored search auctions with markovian users. In WINE '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), Springer-Verlag, pp. 621--628. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Athey, S., and Nekipelov, D. Equilibrium and uncertainty in sponsored search auctions. Manuscript (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benisch, M., Sadeh, N., and Sandholm, T. A theory of expressiveness in mechanisms. In Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2008), pp. 07--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cary, M., Das, A., Edelman, B., Giotis, I., Heimerl, K., Karlin, A. R., Mathieu, C., and Schwarz, M. Greedy bidding strategies for keyword auctions. In EC '07: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce (New York, NY, USA, 2007), ACM, pp. 262--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Das, A., Giotis, I., Karlin, A., and Mathieu, C. On the effects of competing advertisements in keyword auctions. Unpublished Manuscript, May (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M., Fudenberg, T. D., Kaplow, L., Lee, R., Milgrom, P., Niederle, M., and Pakes, A. Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghosh, A., and Mahdian, M. Externalities in online advertising. In WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (New York, NY, USA, 2008), ACM, pp. 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ghosh, A., and Sayedi, A. Expressive Auctions for Externalities in Online Advertising. Manuscript, November (2009). http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/ssayedir/ext.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Giotis, I., and Karlin, A. R. On the equilibria and efficiency of the GSP mechanism in keyword auctions with externalities. In WINE '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), Springer-Verlag, pp. 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gomes, R., Immorlica, N., and Markakis, E. Externalities in keyword auctions: an empirical and theoretical assessment. In WINE '09: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (2009), Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Guruswami, V., Hartline, J., Karlin, A., Kempe, D., Kenyon, C., and McSherry, F. On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (2005), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 1164--1173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jeziorski, P., and Segal, I. What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. Manuscript (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kempe, D., and Mahdian, M. A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. In WINE '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), Springer-Verlag, pp. 585--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Muthukrishnan, S. Bidding on configurations in Internet ad auctions. Manuscript (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sadeh, N., Hong, J., Cranor, L., Fette, I., Kelley, P., Prabaker, M., and Rao, J. Understanding and capturing people's privacy policies in a people finder application. The Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Salek, M., and Kempe, D. Auctions for share-averse bidders. In WINE '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), Springer-Verlag, pp. 609--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Schwartz, B. The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Harper Perennial, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Varian, H. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 6 (2007), 1163--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yu, J., and Deng, X. A new ranking scheme of the GSP mechanism with markovian users. In WINE '09: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (2009), Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Expressive auctions for externalities in online advertising

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
        April 2010
        1407 pages
        ISBN:9781605587998
        DOI:10.1145/1772690

        Copyright © 2010 International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2)

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      ePub

      View this article in ePub.

      View ePub