skip to main content
10.1145/1384271.1384293acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Student use of the PeerWise system

Published:30 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

PeerWise is a web-based system that supports the creation of student-generated test banks of multiple choice questions. Students contribute question stems and answers, provide explanations, answer questions contributed by other students, rate questions for difficulty and quality, and participate in on-line discussions of all these activities.

In 2007, the system was used in four computing classes that varied in level, instructors, and student reward. We present results that show common patterns of response from students, and outline some initial investigations into the impact of the system on student performance. Our main findings are: external motivators are needed only for question generation; exam performance is correlated with participation in on-line discussions; and, despite student enthusiasm, drill-and-practice use does not contribute to exam success.

References

  1. N. Arthur. Using student-generated assessment items to enhance teamwork, feedback and the learning process. Synergy, 24:21--23, 2006. www.itl.usyd.edu.au/synergy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Barak and S. Rafaeli. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61:84--103, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Boud. Enhancing learning through self assessment. Kogan Page, London; Philadelphia, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In ACE'08: Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. W. Anderson et al., editor. A taxonomy for learning and teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S.-B. Chang et al. AGQ: a model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing. In CSCL'05: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pages 28--32. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. J. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2):199--218, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. Ramsden. Learning to teach in higher education. RoutledgeFalmer, London, 2nd edition, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F.-Y. Yu, Y.-H. Liu, and T.-W. Chan. A web-based learning system for question posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4):337--348, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Student use of the PeerWise system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
      June 2008
      394 pages
      ISBN:9781605580784
      DOI:10.1145/1384271

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITiCSE '08 Paper Acceptance Rate60of150submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader