ABSTRACT
PeerWise is a system in which students create multiple choice questions and answer those created by their peers. In this paper, we report on some quantitative results which suggest that students who use PeerWise actively perform better in final examinations than students who are not active. We note a significant correlation between performance in written (not just multiple choice) questions and PeerWise activity, suggesting that active use of the system may contribute to deep (and not just drill-and-practise) learning.
- N. Arthur. Using student-generated assessment items to enhance teamwork, feedback and the learning process. Synergy, 24:21--23, 2006. www.itl.usyd.edu.au/synergy.Google Scholar
- M. Barak and S. Rafaeli. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61:84--103, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Birenbaum and R. A. Feldman. Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1):90--97, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Boud and N. Falchikov. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5):529--549, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Brusilovsky and S. Sosnovsky. Engaging students to work with self-assessment questions: a study of two approaches. In ITiCSE'05: Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 251--255, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Collis and J. Moonen. Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expectations. Kogan Page, London, 2001.Google Scholar
- P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In Simon and M. Hamilton, editors, Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), volume 78 of CRPIT, pages 69--74, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008. ACS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. In ITICSE'08: Proceedings of the 13th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 73--77, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Chang. et al. AGQ: a model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing. In CSCL'05: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pages 28--32. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Falchikov and D. Boud. Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4):395--430, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Fellenz. Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6):703--719, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. A. Horgen. Pedagogical use of multiple choice tests - students create their own tests. In P. Kefalas, A. Sotiriadou, G. Davies, and A. McGettrick, editors, Proceedings of the Informatics Education Europe II Conference. SEERC, 2007.Google Scholar
- C. Lutteroth and A. Luxton-Reilly. Flexible learning in CS2: a case study. In (to appear) Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, Auckland, New Zealand, 2008.Google Scholar
- D. Nicol. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1):53--64, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2):199--218, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Scouller. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4):453--472, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Topping. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3):249--276, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Wenger. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Whalley, R. Lister, E. Thompson, T. Clear, P. Robbins, P. Kumar, and C. Prasad. An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. In ACE'06: Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing education, pages 243--252, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2006. Australian Computer Society, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Yu, Y. Liu, and T. Chan. A web-based learning system for question posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4):337--348, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions
Recommendations
Student use of the PeerWise system
ITiCSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationPeerWise is a web-based system that supports the creation of student-generated test banks of multiple choice questions. Students contribute question stems and answers, provide explanations, answer questions contributed by other students, rate questions ...
Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise
ACE '09: Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 95PeerWise is an online tool that involves students in the process of creating, sharing, answering and discussing multiple choice questions. Previous work has shown that students voluntarily use the large repository of questions developed by their peers ...
The quality of a PeerWise MCQ repository
ACE '10: Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 103PeerWise allows students to create a repository of multiple choice questions which can be attempted by their peers, and discussed between them online. PeerWise has been shown to foster deep learning and to improve students' performance. In this paper, ...
Comments