skip to main content
10.1145/1404520.1404526acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions

Published:06 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

PeerWise is a system in which students create multiple choice questions and answer those created by their peers. In this paper, we report on some quantitative results which suggest that students who use PeerWise actively perform better in final examinations than students who are not active. We note a significant correlation between performance in written (not just multiple choice) questions and PeerWise activity, suggesting that active use of the system may contribute to deep (and not just drill-and-practise) learning.

References

  1. N. Arthur. Using student-generated assessment items to enhance teamwork, feedback and the learning process. Synergy, 24:21--23, 2006. www.itl.usyd.edu.au/synergy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Barak and S. Rafaeli. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61:84--103, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Birenbaum and R. A. Feldman. Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1):90--97, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Boud and N. Falchikov. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5):529--549, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Brusilovsky and S. Sosnovsky. Engaging students to work with self-assessment questions: a study of two approaches. In ITiCSE'05: Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 251--255, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Collis and J. Moonen. Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expectations. Kogan Page, London, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In Simon and M. Hamilton, editors, Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), volume 78 of CRPIT, pages 69--74, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008. ACS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. In ITICSE'08: Proceedings of the 13th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 73--77, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Chang. et al. AGQ: a model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing. In CSCL'05: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pages 28--32. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Falchikov and D. Boud. Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4):395--430, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Fellenz. Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6):703--719, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. A. Horgen. Pedagogical use of multiple choice tests - students create their own tests. In P. Kefalas, A. Sotiriadou, G. Davies, and A. McGettrick, editors, Proceedings of the Informatics Education Europe II Conference. SEERC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Lutteroth and A. Luxton-Reilly. Flexible learning in CS2: a case study. In (to appear) Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, Auckland, New Zealand, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Nicol. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1):53--64, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2):199--218, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Scouller. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4):453--472, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Topping. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3):249--276, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. E. Wenger. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Whalley, R. Lister, E. Thompson, T. Clear, P. Robbins, P. Kumar, and C. Prasad. An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. In ACE'06: Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing education, pages 243--252, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2006. Australian Computer Society, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. F. Yu, Y. Liu, and T. Chan. A web-based learning system for question posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4):337--348, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '08: Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research
      September 2008
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781605582160
      DOI:10.1145/1404520

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader