skip to main content
10.1145/1409635.1409647acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

It's in your eyes: towards context-awareness and mobile HCI using wearable EOG goggles

Published:21 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we describe the design, implementation and evaluation of a novel eye tracker for context-awareness and mobile HCI applications. In contrast to common systems using video cameras, this compact device relies on Electrooculography (EOG). It consists of goggles with dry electrodes integrated into the frame and a small pocket-worn component with a DSP for real-time EOG signal processing. The device is intended for wearable and standalone use: It can store data locally for long-term recordings or stream processed EOG signals to a remote device over Bluetooth. We describe how eye gestures can be efficiently recognised from EOG signals for HCI purposes. In an experiment conducted with 11 subjects playing a computer game we show that 8 eye gestures of varying complexity can be continuously recognised with equal performance to a state-of-the-art video-based system. Physical activity leads to artefacts in the EOG signal. We describe how these artefacts can be removed using an adaptive filtering scheme and characterise this approach on a 5-subject dataset. In addition to explicit eye movements for HCI, we discuss how the analysis of unconscious eye movements may eventually allow to deduce information on user activity and context not available with current sensing modalities.

References

  1. S. P. Liversedge and J. M. Findlay. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1):6--14, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. M. Henderson. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11):498--504, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Melcher and E. Kowler. Visual scene memory and the guidance of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 41(25--26):3597--3611, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. M. Chun. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5):170--178, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Bulling, J. A. Ward, H. Gellersen and G. Tröster. Robust Recognition of Reading Activity in Transit Using Wearable Electrooculography. In Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2008), pages 19--37, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Logan, J. Healey, M. Philipose, E. Tapia and S. Intille. A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2007), pages 483--500, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Hayhoe and D. Ballard. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9:188--194, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. F. Land. Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 25(3):296--324, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Pelz, M. Hayhoe and R. Loeber. The coordination of eye, head, and hand movements in a natural task. Experimental Brain Research, V 139(3):266--277, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Zhai, C. Morimoto and S. Ihde. Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999), pages 246--253, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Qvarfordt and S. Zhai. Conversing with the user based on eye-gaze patterns. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), pages 221--230, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. Drewes and A. Schmidt. Interacting with the Computer Using Gaze Gestures. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2007), pages 475--488, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. J. K. Jacob. What you look at is what you get: eye movement-based interaction techniques. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1990), pages 11--18, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. W. Patmore and R. B. Knapp. Towards an EOG-based eye tracker for computer control. In Proc. of the 3rd International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets 1998), pages 197--203, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Yingxi and W. S. Newman. A human-robot interface based on electrooculography. In Proc. of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2004), pages 243--248, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. F. Mizuno, T. Hayasaka, K. Tsubota, S. Wada and T. Yamaguchi. Development of hands-free operation interface for wearable computer-hyper hospital at home. In Proc. of the 25th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2003), pages 3740--3743, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Manabe and M. Fukumoto. Full-time wearable headphone-type gaze detector. In Ext. Abstr. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), pages 1073--1078, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. T. Vehkaoja, J. A. Verho, M. M. Puurtinen, N. M. Nojd, J. O. Lekkala and J. A. Hyttinen. Wireless Head Cap for EOG and Facial EMG Measurements. In Proc. of the 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2005), pages 5865--5868, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Brown, M. Marmor, Vaegan, E. Zrenner, M. Brigell and M. Bach. ISCEV Standard for Clinical Electro-oculography (EOG), 2006. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 113(3):205--212, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. G. Webster. Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 4th edition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Bulling, P. Herter, M. Wirz and G. Tröster. Automatic Artefact Compensation in EOG Signals. In Adj. Proc. of the 2nd European Conference on Smart Sensing and Context (EuroSSC 2007), pages 12--13, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Schindler, C. Metzger and T. Starner. A Wearable Interface for Topological Mapping and Localization in Indoor Environments. In Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Location- and Context-Awareness (LoCA 2006), pages 64--73, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. It's in your eyes: towards context-awareness and mobile HCI using wearable EOG goggles

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
          September 2008
          404 pages
          ISBN:9781605581361
          DOI:10.1145/1409635

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 September 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader