skip to main content
10.1145/1620545.1620552acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Eye movement analysis for activity recognition

Published:30 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we investigate eye movement analysis as a new modality for recognising human activity. We devise 90 different features based on the main eye movement characteristics: saccades, fixations and blinks. The features are derived from eye movement data recorded using a wearable electrooculographic (EOG) system. We describe a recognition methodology that combines minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection (mRMR) with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. We validate the method in an eight participant study in an office environment using five activity classes: copying a text, reading a printed paper, taking hand-written notes, watching a video and browsing the web. In addition, we include periods with no specific activity. Using a person-independent (leave-one-out) training scheme, we obtain an average precision of 76.1% and recall of 70.5% over all classes and participants. We discuss the most relevant features and show that eye movement analysis is a rich and thus promising modality for activity recognition.

References

  1. D. Bannach, P. Lukowicz, and O. Amft. Rapid Prototyping of Activity Recognition Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2):22--31, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data. In Proc. Pervasive 2004, pages 1--17. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Bulling, D. Roggen, and G. Tröster. Wearable EOG goggles: Seamless sensing and context-awareness in everyday environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments (JAISE), 1(2):157--171, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bulling, J.A. Ward, H. Gellersen, and G. Tröster. Robust Recognition of Reading Activity in Transit Using Wearable Electrooculography. In Proc. Pervasive 2008, pages 19--37. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P.P. Caffier, U. Erdmann, and P. Ullsperger. Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89(3-4):319--325, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R.L. Canosa. Real-world vision: Selective perception and task. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(2):1--34, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Crammer and Y. Singer. Ultraconservative online algorithms for multiclass problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:951--991, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Dempere-Marco, X. Hu, S.L.S. MacDonald, S.M. Ellis, D.M. Hansell, and G.-Z. Yang. The use of visual search for knowledge gathering in image decision support. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(7):741--754, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A.T. Duchowski. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Ehrlichman, D. Micic, A. Sousa, and J. Zhu. Looking for answers: Eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks. Brain and Cognition, 64(1):7--20, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Elhelw, M. Nicolaou, A. Chung, G.-Z. Yang, and M.S. Atkins. A gaze-based study for investigating the perception of visual realism in simulated scenes. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 5(1):1--20, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Fogarty, C. Au, and S.E. Hudson. Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In Proc. UIST 2006, pages 91--100. ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J.J. Gu, M. Meng, A. Cook, and G. Faulkner. A study of natural eye movement detection and ocular implant movement control using processed EOG signals. In Proc. ICRA 2001, volume 2, pages 1555--1560, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S.S. Hacisalihzade, L.W. Stark, and J.S. Allen. Visual perception and sequences of eye movement fixations: a stochastic modeling approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22(3):474--481, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J.M. Henderson. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11):498--504, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. Huynh, M. Fritz, and B. Schiele. Discovery of Activity Patterns using Topic Models. In Proc. UbiComp 2008, pages 10--19. ACM Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C.N. Karson, K.F. Berman, E.F. Donnelly, W.B. Mendelson, J.E. Kleinman, and R.J. Wyatt. Speaking, thinking, and blinking. Psychiatry Research, 5(3):243--246, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N. Kern, B. Schiele, and A. Schmidt. Recognizing context for annotating a live life recording. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(4):251--263, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C.-J. Lin. LIBLINEAR -- a library for large linear classification, 2008. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/Ücjlin/liblinear/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S.P. Liversedge and J.M. Findlay. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4:6--14, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. B. Logan, J. Healey, M. Philipose, E. Tapia, and S. S. Intille. A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition. In Proc. UbiComp 2007, pages 483--500. ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Palomba, M. Sarlo, A. Angrilli, A. Mini, and L. Stegagno. Cardiac responses associated with affective processing of unpleasant film stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36(1):45--57, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. H. Peng. mRMR Feature Selection Toolbox for MATLAB, 2007. http://research.janelia.org/peng/proj/mRMR/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(8):1226--1238, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D.D. Salvucci and J.R. Anderson. Automated eye-movement protocol analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1):39--86, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. Schleicher, N. Galley, S. Briest, and L. Galley. Blinks and saccades as indicators of fatigue in sleepiness warnings: looking tired? Ergonomics, 51(7):982--1010, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M.A. Tinati and B. Mozaffary. A wavelet packets approach to electrocardiograph baseline drift cancellation. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, Article ID 97157, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J.A. Ward, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster. Evaluating performance in continuous context recognition using event-driven error characterisation. In Proc. LoCA 2006, pages 239--255, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Widdel. Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, chapter Operational problems in analysing eye movements, pages 21--29. Elsevier, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Eye movement analysis for activity recognition

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '09: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
        September 2009
        292 pages
        ISBN:9781605584317
        DOI:10.1145/1620545

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 September 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UbiComp '09 Paper Acceptance Rate31of251submissions,12%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader