skip to main content
10.1145/1460563.1460580acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The context, content & community collage: sharing personal digital media in the physical workplace

Published:08 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online social media services enable people to share many aspects of their personal interests and passions with friends, acquaintances and strangers. We are investigating how the display of social media in a workplace context can improve relationships among collocated colleagues. We have designed, developed and deployed the Context, Content and Community Collage, which runs on large LCD touchscreen computers installed in eight locations throughout a research laboratory. This proactive display application senses nearby people via Bluetooth phones, and responds by incrementally adding photos associated with those people to an ambient collage shown on the screen. This paper describes the motivations, goals, design and impact of the system, highlighting the ways the system has increased interactions and improved personal relationships among coworkers at the deployment site. We also look at how the creation of a shared physical window into online media has affected the use of that media.

References

  1. Ames, M., and M. Naaman. Why We Tag: Motivations for Annotation in Mobile and Online Media. Proc. of CHI 2007. 971--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Churchill, E. F., L. Nelson and L. Denoue. Multimedia Fliers: Information Sharing with Digital Community Bulletin Boards. Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Communities and Technologies (C&T 2003). 97--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cohen, D, and L. Prusak. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross, R., and A. Parker. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor. 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg, S., and M. Rounding. The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal Displays. Proc. of CHI 2001. 515--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Huang, E. M., A. Koster and J. Borchers. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? Proc. of Pervasive 2008. 228--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Knorr Cetina, K. Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 14(4): 1--30. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lenhart, A., J. Horrigan and D. Fallows. Online Content Creation. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 29 February 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenhart, A., M. Madden, A. Macgill and A. Smith. Teens and Social Media. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 17 December 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. McCarthy, J. F., D. W. McDonald, S. Soroczak, D. H. Nguyen and A. M. Rashid. Augmenting the Social Space of an Academic Conference. Proc. of CSCW 2004. 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Millen, D. R., J. Feinberg and B. Kerr. Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. Proc. of CHI 2006. 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. O'Hara, K., M. Perry, E. Churchill and D. Russell. Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies. Springer. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Patel, S., J. A. Kientz, G. R. Hayes, S. Bhat, G. D. Abowd. Farther Than You May Think: An Empirical Investigation of the Proximity of Users to Their Mobile Phones. Proc.of UbiComp 2006. 123--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Peltonen, P., E. Kurvinen, A. Salovaara, G. Jacucci, T. Ilmonen, J. Evans, A. Oulasvirta, P. Saarikko. "It's Mine, Don't Touch!": Interactions at a Large Multi-Touch Display in a City Centre. Proc. of CHI 2008. 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rath, T. Vital Friends: The People You Can't Afford to Live Without. Gallup Press. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Russell, D. M., C, Drews and A. Sue. Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration. Proc.of UbiComp 2002. 194--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wells, M W. Office Clutter or Meaningful Personal Displays: The Role of Office Personalization in Employee and Organizational Well-Being. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2000) 20, 239--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The context, content & community collage: sharing personal digital media in the physical workplace

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      November 2008
      752 pages
      ISBN:9781605580074
      DOI:10.1145/1460563

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 November 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader