David Ribes
Thomas A. Finholt
ABSTRACT
This paper traces the use of the concept 'community' by drawing attention to the ways in which it serves as an organizing principle within systems development. The data come from an ethnographic study of participants and their activities in the Water and Environmental Research Systems Network (WATERS). WATERS is a US National Science Foundation-funded observatory and cyberinfrastructure project intended to serve the heterogeneous scientific disciplines studying the water environment. We identify four vehicles by which WATERS participants sought to know the needs, conflicts and goals of their diverse communities: engaging in vernacular discussions; organizing community forums; implementing surveys; and requirements gathering. The paper concludes that the use of community in IT development projects is substantially divorced from its traditional meanings which emphasize collective moral orientations or shared affective ties; instead, within systems development, community has a closer meaning to a 'political constituency,' and is used as a short-hand for issues of inquiry, representation, inclusion and mandate.
- Atkins, D. E. C. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure, National Science Foundation, 2003.Google Scholar
- Bender, T. Community and Social Change in America. Rutgers University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman. in Law, J. and Kegan, P. eds. Power, Action and Belief, Routledge, 1986.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. in Law, J. ed. A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Sociological Review Monogrpah 38, Routledge, London, 1991, 132--161.Google Scholar
- Fischer, G. Domain-oriented design environments. Automated Software Engineering, 1 (2). 177--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gieryn, T. F. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science From Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6). 781--795.Google Scholar
- Goguen, J. Requirements Engineering as the Reconciliation of Social and Technical Issues. in Jirotka, M. and Goguen, J. eds. Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, Academic Press, London, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goguen, J. and Linde, C. Techniques for Requirements Elicitation. in Fickas, S. and Finkelstein, A. eds. Proceedings, Requirements Engineering '93, Computer Society, IEEE, 1993, 152--164.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, K. A., Finholt, T. A. and Kim, I.-h. Cyberinfrastructure for the WATERS Network: a Survey of AEESP and CUAHSI Members, 2006.Google Scholar
- Lee, C. P., Dourish, P. and Mark, G. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, NY, NY. 483--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynch, M. Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1993.Google Scholar
- Montgomery, J. L., Harmon, T., Hass, C. N., Hooper, R., Clesceri, N. L., Graham, W., Kaiser, W., Sanderson, A., Minsker, B., Schnoor, J. and Brezonik, P. The WATERS Network: An Integrated Environmental Observatory Network for Water Research. Environmental Science and Technology, 41 (19). 6642--6647.Google ScholarCross Ref
- NAS, T.N.A.o.S. Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004.Google Scholar
- Ribes, D. and Baker, K. S. Elements of Social Science Engagement in Information Infrastructure Design. ACM: The Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, San Diego, CA, May 21-24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ribes, D. and Baker, K. S. Modes of Social Science Engagement in Community Infrastructure Design. in Steinfield, Pentland, B. T., Ackerman, M. and Contractor, N. eds. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Communities and Technology, Springer, London, 2007, 107--130.Google Scholar
- Ribes, D. and Bowker, G. C. Organizing for Multidisciplinary Collaboration: The Case of the Geosciences Network. in Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S. and Zimmerman, A. eds. Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
- Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P. and Bentley, R. Sociologists Can Be Surprisingly Useful in Interactive Systems Design Proceedings of the HCI'92 Conference on People and Computers VII, 1992, 341--353. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, P. Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York, NY, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S. L. and Ruhleder, K., Steps Towards and Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access for Large-Scale Collaborative Systems. in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (Chapel Hill, 1994), ACM Press, 253--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strauss, A. Continual Permutations of Action. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge Building. Organization, 7 (2). 311--327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suchman, L., Trigg, R. and Blomberg, J. Working artefacts: ethnometods of the prototype. British Journal of Sociology, 53 (2). 163--179.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taylor, F. Shifting from a heteronomous to an autonomous worldview of organizational communication: Communication theory on the cusp. Communication Theory, 15 (3). 1--35.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. R. and Van Every, E. J. The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2000.Google Scholar
- Throgmorton, J. A. Planning as Persuasive Storytelling. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.Google Scholar
- WATERS (ed.), http://www.watersnet.org/history.html, accessed Dec.12.2008, 2008.Google Scholar
- Woolgar, S. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. in Law, J. ed. A Sociology of Monsters, Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
- Woolgar, S. Rethinking requirements analysis: Some implication of recent research into producer consumer relationships in IT development. in Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, Academic Press, New York, 1994, 201--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Representing community: knowing users in the face of changing constituencies
Recommendations
Community engagement for research: contextual design in rural CSCW system development
C&T '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and TechnologiesIn order to bring about innovation within a community-based context, different stakeholder communities often need to be engaged so that they may appropriately take part in the design process. The 'invisible' work of engagement is frequently overlooked, ...
Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web
WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web ConferenceUsers organize themselves into communities on web platforms. These communities can interact with one another, often leading to conflicts and toxic interactions. However, little is known about the mechanisms of interactions between communities and how ...
Community Inventor Days: Scaffolding Grassroots Innovation with Maker Events
DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsThis paper describes a series of Inventor Days designed to catalyse sustainable relationships between communities and makers to support grassroots innovation. By appropriating core properties of hackathons, the Inventor Days brought together residents ...
Comments