skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518797acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Signpost from the masses: learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social tagging arose out of the need to organize found content that is worth revisiting. A significant side effect has been the use of social tagging sites as navigational signposts for interesting content. The collective behavior of users who tagged contents seems to offer a good basis for exploratory search interfaces, even for users who are not using social bookmarking sites. In this paper, we present the design of a tag-based exploratory system and detail an experiment in understanding its effectiveness. The tag-based search system allows users to utilize relevance feedback on tags to indicate their interest in various topics, enabling rapid exploration of the topic space. The experiment shows that the system seems to provide a kind of scaffold for users to learn new topics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p625.mov

mov

15.8 MB

References

  1. Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bush, V. As We May Think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176, 1, (1945),101--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chi, E.H. and Mytkowicz, T. Understanding the Efficiency of Social Tagging Systems using Information Theory. Proc. Hypertext 2008, ACM Press (2008),. 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Evans, B. and Chi, E. H. Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search. In Proc. of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), pp. 485--494. ACM Press, 2008. San Diego, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fitzpatrick, L. and Dent, M. Automatic feedback using past queries: social searching? Proc. 20th Annual Intern. ACM SIGIR Conference. ACM Press (1997), 306--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Furnas, G.W., Fake, C., von Ahn, L., Schachter, J., Golder, S., Fox, K., Davis, M., Marlow, C. Naaman, M. Why do tagging systems work? Extended Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M. and Dumais, S.T. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM, 30 (1987), 964--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Glance, N.S. Community search assistant. Proc. IUI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 91--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Golder, S. and Huberman, B.A. Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science, 32, 2 (2006), 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. Development of the NASA-tlx (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload (1988), 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong, L., Chi, E.H., Budiu, R., Pirolli, P. and Nelson, L. SparTag.us: Low Cost Tagging System for Foraging of Web Content. Proc. AVI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., and Suh, B. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Pres (2008), 453--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, K.J. What Goes Around Comes Around: An Analysis of del.icio.us as Social Space. Proc. CSCW'06, ACM Press (2006), 191--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marchionini, G. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49, 4 (2006), 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Millen, D., Yang, M., Whittaker, S.and Feinberg, J. Social bookmarking and exploratory search. In L. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R. Harper, and K. Schmidt (eds.). Proc. ECSCW'07, Springer (2007) 21--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Raghavan, V.V. and Sever, H. On the Reuse of Past Optimal Queries. Proc. SIGIR95, ACM Press (1995), 344--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D. and Croft, W.B. Clarifying search: a user-interface framework for text searches, D-lib magazine, 3, 1 (1997), Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january97/retrieval/01shneiderman.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon, H.A. Structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 3--4 (1973), 181--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. White, R.W., Drucker, S.M., Marchionini, M., Hearst, M., schraefel, m.c. Exploratory search and HCI: designing and evaluating interfaces to support exploratory search interaction. Extended Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2877--2880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Signpost from the masses: learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                April 2009
                2426 pages
                ISBN:9781605582467
                DOI:10.1145/1518701

                Copyright © 2009 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 4 April 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader