skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518966acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Lifelogging' technology makes it possible to amass digital data about every aspect of our everyday lives. Instead of focusing on such technical possibilities, here we investigate the way people compose long-term mnemonic representations of their lives. We asked 10 families to create a time capsule, a collection of objects used to trigger remembering in the distant future. Our results show that contrary to the lifelogging view, people are less interested in exhaustively digitally recording their past than in reconstructing it from carefully selected cues that are often physical objects. Time capsules were highly expressive and personal, many objects were made explicitly for inclusion, however with little object annotation. We use these findings to propose principles for designing technology that supports the active reconstruction of our future past.

References

  1. Bell, G., and Gemmell, J A. Digital life. Scientific American, March 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bih, H-D. The meaning of objects in environmental transitions: experiences of chinese students in the United States. Environmental Psychology, 12 (1992), 135--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Connerton, P. How societies remember. UK: Cambridge University Press (1989)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Conway, M.A. Memory and the self. Memory and Language, 53 (2005), 594--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., and Mariani, J. Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware. Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004) 396--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rochberg-Halton, E. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. UK: Cambridge University Press (1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Frohlich, D. Audiophotography. Kluver, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Frohlich, D. M. and Murphy, R. The Memory Box, Personal Technologies, 4 (2000), 238--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti E. Cultural probes. Interactions, 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11, 5, (2004), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gilboa, A. Autobiographical and episodic memory - one and the same? Evidence from prefrontal activation in neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 42, 10 (2004), 1336--1349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. González, J. A. Autotopographies. In Brahm and Driscoll (Eds.), Prosthetic Territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies, Westview Press (1995), 133--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Halbwachs, M. On Collective Memories. The University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper, R., Randall, D., Smyth, N., Evans, C., Heledd, L., and Moore, R. The past is a different place: they do things differently there. Proc. DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008) 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hoven, E. van den, and Eggen, B. Informing Augmented Memory System design through Autobiographical Memory theory. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12, 6 (2008), 433--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kalnikaite, V., and Whittaker, S. Software or Wetware? Discovering When and Why People Use Digital Prosthetic Memory. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kern, N., Schiele, B., and Schmidt, A. Recognizing context for annotating a live life recording. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (2007), 251--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lillios, K.T. Objects of memory: the ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms. J. of Archaeological Method and Theory, 6, 3 (1999), 235--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mann, S. Continuous lifelog capture of personal experience with EyeTap. Proc. CARPE 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marshall, C. How people manage personal information over a lifetime. In Jones&Teevan (Eds.) Personal Information Management, University of Washington Press. (2007), 57--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, K., and Fivush, R. The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural development theory. Psychological Review, 111, 2 (2004), 486--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Oleksik, G., Frohlich, D., Brown, L., and Sellen, A. Sonic interventions: understanding and extending the domestic soundscape. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1419--1428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Park, D.C. Aging and memory: mechanisms underlying age difference in performance. The Australasian J. on Aging: Supplement, 17 (1998), 69--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Peirce, C. Principles of philosophy. Belknap Press, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., and Brockmeier, J. AutoTopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rodden, K. and Wood, K. How do People Manage Their Digital Photographs? Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 409--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sellen, A., Fogg, A., Aitken, M., Hodges, S., Rother, C., and Wood, K. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past? Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shen, C., Lesh, N., and Vernier, F. Personal Digital Historian: Story Sharing Around the Table. Interactions, March + April 2003, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Stevens, M. M., Abowd, G. D., Truong, K. N., and Vollmer, F. Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family Archives&Holistic Design, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7 (2003), 210--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Turkle, S. (Ed.) Evocative Objects - Things we think with. MIT Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Q., and Brockmeier, J. Autobiographical Remembering as cultural practice. Culture&Psychology, 8, 1 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. West, D., Quigley, A., and Kay, J. MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 4 (2007), 313--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making history: intentional capture of future memories

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader