skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519008acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

People regularly interact with different representations of Web pages. A person looking for new information may initially find a Web page represented as a short snippet rendered by a search engine. When he wants to return to the same page the next day, the page may instead be represented by a link in his browser history. Previous research has explored how to best represent Web pages in support of specific task types, but, as we find in this paper, consistency in representation across tasks is also important. We explore how different representations are used in a variety of contexts and present a compact representation that supports both the identification of new, relevant Web pages and the re-finding of previously viewed pages.

References

  1. Adar, E., Teevan, J., and Dumais, S. T. (2008). Large scale analysis of Web revisitation patterns. In Proceedings of CHI '08, pp. 1197--1206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baudisch, P., Lee, B. and Hanna, L. (2004). Fishnet, a fisheye Web browser with search term popouts: A comparative evaluation with overview and linear view. In Proceedings of AVI '04, pp. 133--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Better Search Firefox Extension. From https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/211Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, H., Jones, W. and Dumais, S. (2004). Keeping and re-finding information on the Web: What do people do and what do they need? In Proceedings of ASIST '04.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. (2001). What do Web users do? An empirical analysis of Web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6): 903--922. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cockburn, A. and Greenberg, S. (2000). Issues of page representation and organisation in Web browser-revisitation tools. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 7(2):120--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Herder, E. (2005). Characterizations of user Web revisit behavior. In Proceedings of Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hightower, R., Ring, L., Helfman, J., Bederson, B., Hollan, J. (1998). Graphical Multiscale Web Histories: A Study of PadPrints. Hypertext 1998, 58--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hu, J. and Bagga, A. (2004). Categorizing images in Web documents. IEEE MultiMedia, 11(1): 22--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kaasten, S., Greenberg, S. and Edwards, C. (2002). How people recognize previously seen Web pages from titles, URLs and thumbnails. In Proceedings of HCI '02, pp. 247--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lam, H. and Baudisch, P. (2005). Summary Thumbnails: Readable overviews for small screen Web browsers. In Proceedings of CHI '05, pp. 681--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lansdale, M. (1988). The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics, 19(1): 458--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Maekawa, T., Hara, T. and Nishio, S. (2006). Image classification for mobile Web browsing. In Proceedings of WWW 2006, 43--52 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Obendorf, H., Weinreich, W., Herder, E. and Mayer, M. (2007). Web page revisitation revisited: Implications of a long-term click-stream study of browser usage. In Proceedings of CHI '07, pp. 597--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ranie, L. and Shermak, J. (2005). Pew Internet and American Life Project: Data memo on search engine use. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SearchData_1105.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. RedZee. http://www.redzee.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Robertson, G., Czerwinski M., Larson, K., Robbins, D. Thiel, D. van Dantzich, M. (1998) Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of UIST '98, pp. 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Searchme. http://www.searchme.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tauscher, L. and Greenberg, S. (1997). How people revisit Web pages: Empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1):97--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Teevan, J., Adar, E., Jones, R. and Potts, M. A. (2007). Information re-retrieval: Repeat queries in Yahoo's logs. In Proceedings of SIGIR '07, pp. 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, E. G. M. and Milios, E. (2005). Weighted link analysis for logo and trademark image retrieval on the Web. In Proceedings of WI '05, 581--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Woodruff, A., Faulring, A., Rosenhotlz, R., Morrison, J. and Pirolli, P. (2001). Using thumbnails to search the Web. In Proceedings of CHI '01, pp. 198--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J., Faulring, A. and Pirolli, P. (2002). A comparison on the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks. JASIST, 53(2), 172--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader