skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519009acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The act of encountering information unexpectedly has long been identified as valuable, both as a joy in itself and as part of task-focused problem solving. There has been a concern that highly accurate search engines and targeted personalization may reduce opportunities for serendipity on the Web. We examine whether there is the potential for serendipitous encounters during Web search, and whether improving search relevance through personalization reduces this potential. By studying Web search query logs and the results people judge relevant and interesting, we find many of the queries people perform return interesting (potentially serendipitous) results that are not directly relevant. Rather than harming serendipity, personalization appears to identify interesting results in addition to relevant ones.

References

  1. De Bruijn, O.&Spence, R. A new framework for theory-based interaction design applied to serendipitous information retrieval, ACM TOCHI 15,1 (2008), 1--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Erdelez, S. Information encountering: It's more than just bumping into information, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 25,3(1999) 25--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Erdelez, S. Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment, Information Processing and Management 40,6 (2004), 1013--1025. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Foster, A.&Ford, N. Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study, J. Documentation 59,3 (2003) 321--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G.&Riedl, J. T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems, ACM TOIS 22, 1 (2004), 5--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Johnson, S. B. (2006), Can we please kill this meme now. Retrieved 14 Sep 2008: http://tinyurl.com/sbjohnsonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. McKeen, W. (2006), The endangered joy of serendipity, St. Petersburg Times Retrieved Sep 2008 http://tinyurl.com/mckeenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ranie, L.&Shermak, J. (2005), Pew Internet and American Life Project: Data memo on search engine use. Retrieved 14 Sep 2008: http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SearchData_1105.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J.&Reidl, J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms, Proc WWW '01, 285--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shen, X., Tan, B.&Zhai, C. Implicit user modeling for personalized search, Proc CIKM'05 824--831. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Spink, A., Greisdorf, H.&Bateman, J. From highly relevant to not relevant: Examining different regions of relevance, IP&M 34, 5 (1998), 599--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T.&Horvitz, E. Beyond the commons: on the value of personalizing Web search. Proc PIA'05, 84--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T.&Horvitz, E. Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities, Proc SIGIR '05, 449--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Toms, E. Serendipitous information retrieval, Proc of the First DELOS Network of Excellence Workshop on Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Andel, P. Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science45, 2 (1994), 631--648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolfe, M., Schreiner, M., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P., Kintsch, W.&Landauer, T. Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by Latent Semantic Analysis, Discourse Processes 25, (1998) 309--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ziegler, C., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A.&Lausen, G. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification, Proc. WWW '05 22--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2009
        2426 pages
        ISBN:9781605582467
        DOI:10.1145/1518701

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader