Airi Lampinen
Sakari Tamminen
Antti Oulasvirta
ABSTRACT
A mundane but theoretically interesting and practically relevant situation presents itself on social networking sites: the co-presence of multiple groups important to an individual. This primarily qualitative study concentrates on the point of view of individual SNS users and their perspectives on multiple group affiliations. After charting the perceived multiplicity of groups on the social networking site Facebook, we investigated the relevance of multiple groups to the users and the effect of group co-presence on psychological identification processes. Users deal with group co-presence by managing the situation to prevent anticipated conflictive and identity-threatening situations. Their behavioral strategies consist of dividing the platform into separate spaces, using suitable channels of communication, and performing self-censorship. Mental strategies include both the creation of more inclusive in-group identities and the reciprocity of trusting other users and being responsible. In addition to giving further evidence of the existence of group co-presence on SNSs, the study sheds light on the management of the phenomenon. Management of group co-presence should be supported, since otherwise users may feel the urge to resort to defensive strategies of social identity protection such as ceasing to use SNSs altogether or, less dramatically, limit their use according to "the least common denominator". Hence, the phenomenon merits the attention of researchers, developers, and designers alike.
- Acquisti, A. & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In P. Golle & G. Danezis (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pp. 36--58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- boyd, d. (2003). Reflections on Friendster, trust, and intimacy. In Intimate (Ubiquitous) Computing Workshop (UbiComp 2003). Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
- boyd, d. m. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2004). Vienna, Austria. Google ScholarDigital Library
- boyd, d. m. & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer--Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210--230.Google Scholar
- Brewer, M. B. & Gaertner, S. L. (2001). Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorization. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (pp. 451--472). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. (2000). Group Processes: Dynamics within and between Groups, second edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
- ComScore. Online material (most recently consulted on August, 29, 2008): http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1519.Google Scholar
- DiMicco, J. M. & Millen, D. R. (2007). Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook. Paper presented at the GROUP Conference, Sanibel Island, Florida. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donath, J. & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Facebook. Online material (most recently consulted on August 29, 2008): http://www.facebook.com/.Google Scholar
- Gaertner, S. L. et al. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gross, R. & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES 2005). Alexandria, Virginia: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach, second edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hewitt, A. & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff,Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, J. E. (1988). Social identity and intergroup conflict: An Israeli view. In W. Stroebe et al. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 89--102). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lenhart, A. & Madden, M, (2007, April 18). Teens, privacy, & online social networks. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. Online material (most recently consulted on January 12, 2009): http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
- Roccas, S. & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social Identity Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88--106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Skevington, S. & Baker, D. (1989). The Social Identity of Women. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (1972). La catégorisation sociale. In S. Moscovici (ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (pp. 272--302). Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (1978). The psychological structure of intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, European Monographs in Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33--48). Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- All My People Right Here, Right Now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site
Recommendations
Practices of balancing privacy and publicness in social network services
GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkWhile social media is all about sharing content with a community, few people wish to share everything, with everyone, all the time. This means that users balance between making some things public and keeping other content private. The presented ...
What drives electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites? Perspectives of social capital and self-determination
Social-network-based communication is becoming a necessity for companies to stay competitive.We study eWOM in social networking sites from social capital and self-determination perspectives.The factors of tie strength and innovativeness directly ...
A study of the relationship between narcissism, extraversion, drive for entertainment, and narcissistic behavior on social networking sites
As social networking sites are gaining popularity, the rise in narcissistic culture on theses sites are also documented. Literature suggests users' personality traits may be important factors leading people to engage in narcissistic behaviors. Using a ...
Comments