skip to main content
10.1145/1880071.1880142acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Practices of balancing privacy and publicness in social network services

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

While social media is all about sharing content with a community, few people wish to share everything, with everyone, all the time. This means that users balance between making some things public and keeping other content private. The presented dissertation research concerns practices of managing privacy and publicness in social network services (SNS), with a focus on group co-presence, interdependence and differing levels of use activity. The work aims at gaining insight into social identities and self-presentation in the era of technologically mediated social interaction. The findings are expected to contribute to design solutions that could lighten the privacy and publicness management burden that users of social media currently bear.

References

  1. boyd, d. (2007). Why Youth (heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In Buckingham, D. (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007, 119--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. boyd, d. m. & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bregman, A. & Haythornthwaite, C. (2003) Radicals of presentation: visibility, relation, and co-presence in persistent conversation. New Media & Society, 5(1), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A. (2009). "All My People Right Here, Right Now": Management of Group Co-Presence on a Social Networking Site. In Proceedings of International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP'09). Sanibel Island, Florida, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lederer, S., Hong, J. I., Dey, A. K., Landay, J. A. (2004). Personal Privacy through Understanding and Action: Five Pitfalls for Designers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(6), 440--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Palen, L. and Dourish, P. (2003) Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003). ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Razavi, M. N. & Iverson, L. (2009). Improving Personal Privacy in Social Systems with People-tagging. In Proceedings of International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP'09). Sanibel Island, Florida, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Practices of balancing privacy and publicness in social network services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      November 2010
      378 pages
      ISBN:9781450303873
      DOI:10.1145/1880071

      Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2010

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader