skip to main content
research-article

SystemC/C-based model-driven design for embedded systems

Published:24 July 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article summarizes our effort, since 2004 up to the present time, for improving the current industrial Systems-on-Chip and Embedded Systems design by joining the capabilities of the unified modeling language (UML) and SystemC/C programming languages to operate at system-level. The proposed approach exploits the OMG model-driven architecture—a framework for Model-driven Engineering—capabilities of reducing abstract, coarse-grained and platform-independent system models to fine-grained and platform-specific models. We first defined a design methodology and a development flow for the hardware, based on a SystemC UML profile and encompassing different levels of abstraction. We then included a multithread C UML profile for modelling software applications. Both SystemC/C profiles are consistent sets of modelling constructs designed to lift the programming features (both structural and behavioral) of the two coding languages to the UML modeling level. The new codesign flow is supported by an environment, which allows system modeling at higher abstraction levels (from a functional executable level to a register transfer level) and supports automatic code-generation/back-annotation from/to UML models.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Arlow, J. and Neustadt, I. 2002. UML and the Unified Process. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ASMETA. 2009. The Abstract State Machine mETAmodeling. Web site. http://asmeta.sf.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bézivin, J. 2005. On the unification power of models. Softw. Syst. Model. 4, 2, 171--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bocchio, S., Lavazza, L., Mantellini, L., and Rosti, A. 2007. A UML profile for Posix thread library. STMicroelctronics Tech. rep., AST-AGR-2007-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocchio, S., Riccobene, E., Rosti, A., and Scandurra, P. 2005. A SoC design flow-based on UML 2.0 and SystemC. In Proceedings of the International Design Automation Conference. ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocchio, S., Riccobene, E., Rosti, A., and Scandurra, P. 2008. An enhanced SystemC UML profile for modeling at transaction-level. In Embedded Systems Specification and Design Languages. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Börger, E. and Stärk, R. 2003. Abstract State Machines: A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bruschi, F. and Sciuto, D. 2002. SystemC based design flow starting from UML model. In Proceedings of the European SystemC Users Group Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carioni, A., Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., and Scandurra, P. 2008. Scenario-based validation of embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Carioni, A., Gargantini, A. Riccobene, E., and Scandurra, P. 2009. Model-driven system validation by scenarios. In Languages for Embedded Systems and Their Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J. and Cui, H. 2004. Translation from adapted UML to Promela for CORBA-based applications. In Proceedings of the 11th SPIN Workshop. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 234--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Czarnecki, K. and Helsen, S. 2003. Classification of model transformation approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd OOPSLA Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Achitecture. ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ECSI UML Workshop. 2006. UML profiles for embedded systems, http://www.ecsi-association.org/ecsi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards, M. and Green, P. 2003. UML for hardware and software object modeling. In UML for Real: Design of Embedded Real-Time Systems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Enterprise Architect. 2008. The Enterprise Architect Tool. http://www.sparxsystems.com.au/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., and Scandurra, P. 2008a. A language and a simulation engine for abstract state machines based on meta-modeling. J. Universal Comput. Sci. 14, 12, 1949--1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., and Scandurra, P. 2008b. A model-driven validation&verification environment for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES'08). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., and Scandurra, P. 2009. Model-driven design and ASM-based validation of embedded systems. In Behavioral Modeling for Embedded Systems and Technologies: Applications for Design and Implementation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gröetker, T., Liao, S., Martin, G., and Swan, S. 2002. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. IP-XACT. 2007. SPIRIT Consortium, IP-XACT schema v1.4. http://www.spiritconsortium.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jerraya, A. A. and Wolf, W. 2004. Multi-Processor Systems-on-Chips. Elsevier, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Keutzer, K., Newton, A. R., Rabaey, J. M., and Vincentelli, A. S. 2000. System-level design: Orthogonalization of concerns and platform-based design. IEEE Trans. CAD Integr. Circu. Syst. 19, 12, 1523--1543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kreku, J., Hoppari, M., and Tiensyrja, K. 2007. SystemC workload model generation from UML for performance simulation. In Proceedings of the Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruchten, P. 1999. The Rational Unified Process. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lavangno, L., Martin, G., Vincentelli, A. S., Rabaey, J., Chen, R., and Sgroi, M. 2003. UML and platform-based design. In UML for Real Design of Embedded Real-Time Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Leroux, H., Mingins, C., and Requile-Romanczuk, A. 2003. JACOT: A UML-based tool for the run-time-inspecton of concurrent Java programs. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Run-Time Inspection. Elsvier, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. MARTE. 2008. OMG, UML Profile for Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems (MARTE), ptc/08-06-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, G. 1999. UML and VCC. White paper. Candence Design Systems. Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, G. and Mueller, W. 2005. UML for SoC Design. Springer, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. MDA. 2003. OMG, the Model Driven Architecture. Guide V1.0.1. http://www.omg.org/mda/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, T., Vanderperren, Y., Sonck, G., Van Oostende, P., Pauwels, M., and Dehaene, W. 2002. A design methodology for the development of a complex system-on-chip using UML and executable system models. In Proceedings of the Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mura, M. Paoloieri, M., Negri, L., and Sami, M. 2007. StateCharts to SystemC: A high-level hardware simulation approach. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI. ACM, New York, 505--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Nguyen, K. D., Sun, Z., Thiagarajan, P. S., and Wong, W. F. 2005. Model-driven SoC design: The UML-SystemC bridge. In UML for SoC Design, Martin, G. and Mueller, W. Springer, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. OCCN. 2005. OCCN Project. http://occn.sourceforge.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Open Group. 2008. The Open Group Consortium. http://www.opengroup.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. OpenMP. 2008. OpenMP Application Program Interface. http://www.openmp.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. OSCI Group. 2008. The Open SystemC Initiative. http://www.systemc.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Raslam, W. and Sameh, A. 2007. Mapping SysML to SystemC. In Proceedings of Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Riccobene, E. and Scandurra, P. 2004. Modelling SystemC process behavior by the UML method state machines. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Rapid Integration of Software Engineering Techniques. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2005a. A SoC design methodology based on a UML 2.0 profile for SystemC. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE'05). IEEE, Los Alamitos. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2005b. A UML 2.0 profile for SystemC: Toward high-level SoC design. STMicroelectronics Tech. rep., AST-AGR-2005-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2005c. A UML 2.0 profile for SystemC: Toward high-level SoC design. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Embedded Software. ACM, New York, 138--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2006a. A model-driven co-design flow for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2006b. A model-driven design environment for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Design Automation. ACM, New York, 915--918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2007a. A model-driven co-design flow for embedded systems. In Advances in Design and Specification Languages for Embedded Systems. Springer, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P., Rosti, A., and Bocchio, S. 2007b. Designing a unified process for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Model-based Methodologies for Pervasive and Embedded Software. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Selic, B. 2000. A generic framework for modeling resources with UML. Computer 33, 6, 64--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. SPT. 2003. OMG, UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time, formal/03-09-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. SysML. 2007. OMG, SysML, formal/2007-09-01. http://www.omgsysml.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. SystemC. 2006. SystemC Language Reference Manual. IEEE Std 1666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas, F., Gerard, S., Delatour, J. and Terrier, F. 2007. Software real-time resource modeling. In Proceedings of the Forum on Specification and Design Languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. UML. 2008. OMG, the Unified Modeling Language (UML). http://www.uml.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. UML Profile for SWRadio. 2007. OMG, UML Profile for SWRadio. V1.0, formal/07-03-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. UML-SoC Workshops. 2008. UML for SoC Design Workshops. http://www.c-lab.de/uml-soc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. USoC. 2006. OMG, UML Profile for SoC Specification, v1.0.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Vardi, M. Y. 2007. Formal Techniques for SystemC Verification; Position Paper. In Proceedings of the 44th annual conference on Design automation. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Vincentelli, A. S. 2002. Defining platform-based design. EEDesign of EETimes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu, Q., Oishi, R., Hasegawa, T., and Nakata, T. 2004. System-on-chip validation using UML and CWL. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 92--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Zimmerman, J. Bringmann, O., Gerlach, J., Schaefer, F., and Nageldinger, U. 2008. Holistic sytem modeling and refinement of intern-connected micro-electronic systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation, and Test in Europe. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SystemC/C-based model-driven design for embedded systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
          ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 8, Issue 4
          July 2009
          208 pages
          ISSN:1539-9087
          EISSN:1558-3465
          DOI:10.1145/1550987
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 July 2009
          • Accepted: 1 September 2008
          • Revised: 1 April 2008
          • Received: 1 April 2008
          Published in tecs Volume 8, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader