skip to main content
10.1145/1719970.1719996acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a reputation-based model of social web search

Published:07 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

While web search tasks are often inherently collaborative in nature, many search engines do not explicitly support collaboration during search. In this paper, we describe HeyStaks (www.heystaks.com), a system that provides a novel approach to collaborative web search. Designed to work with mainstream search engines such as Google, HeyStaks supports searchers by harnessing the experiences of others as the basis for result recommendations. Moreover, a key contribution of our work is to propose a reputation system for HeyStaks to model the value of individual searchers from a result recommendation perspective. In particular, we propose an algorithm to calculate reputation directly from user search activity and we provide encouraging results for our approach based on a preliminary analysis of user activity and reputation scores across a sample of HeyStaks users.

References

  1. S. Amershi and M. R. Morris. Cosearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search. In CHI, pages 1647--1656, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. O. Boydell and B. Smyth. Capturing community search expertise for personalized web search using snippet-indexes. In CIKM, pages 277--286, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. U. Kuter and J. Golbeck. SUNNY: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks, using probabilistic confidence models. In AAAI, pages 1377--1382, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. R. Morris. A survey of collaborative web search practices. In CHI, pages 1657--1660, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. R. Morris and E. Horvitz. Smbox3: Storable, shareable search. In INTERACT (1), pages 120--123, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. R. Morris and E. Horvitz. Searchtogether: an interface for collaborative web search. In UIST, pages 3--12, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In IUI, pages 167--174, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Preece and B. Shneiderman. The reader to leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1):13--32, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. M. Rashid, K. Ling, R. D. Tassone, P. Resnick, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In CHI, pages 955--958, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. C. Reddy and P. Dourish. A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. In CSCW, pages 344--353, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. C. Reddy, P. Dourish, and W. Pratt. Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care. In ECSCW, pages 239--258, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. C. Reddy and B. J. Jansen. A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams. Inf. Process. Manage., 44(1):256--273, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. C. Reddy and P. R. Spence. Collaborative information seeking: A field study of a multidisciplinary patient care team. Inf. Process. Manage., 44(1):242--255, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. F. Smeaton, C. Foley, D. Byrne, and G. J. F. Jones. ibingo mobile collaborative search. In CIVR, pages 547--548, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. F. Smeaton, H. Lee, C. Foley, and S. McGivney. Collaborative video searching on a tabletop. Multimedia Syst., 12(4-5):375--391, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Smyth. A community-based approach to personalizing web search. IEEE Computer, 40(8):42--50, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Smyth, E. Balfe, J. Freyne, P. Briggs, M. Coyle, and O. Boydell. Exploiting query repetition and regularity in an adaptive community-based web search engine. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 14(5):383--423, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Smyth, P. Briggs, M. Coyle, and M. P. O'Mahony. A case-based perspective on social web search. In ICCBR, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B. Smyth, P. Briggs, M. Coyle, and M. P. O'Mahony. Google? shared! a case-study in social search. In User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Springer-Verlag, June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards a reputation-based model of social web search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '10: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2010
      460 pages
      ISBN:9781605585154
      DOI:10.1145/1719970

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader