skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753628acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent emphasis on sustainability has made consumers more aware of their responsibility for saving resources, in particular, electricity. Consumers can better understand how to save electricity by gaining awareness of their consumption beyond the typical monthly bill. We conducted a study to understand consumers' awareness of energy consumption in the home and to determine their requirements for an interactive, always-on interface for exploring data to gain awareness of home energy consumption. In this paper, we describe a three-stage approach to supporting electricity conservation routines: raise awareness, inform complex changes, and maintain sustainable routines. We then present the findings from our study to support design implications for energy consumption feedback interfaces.

References

  1. M. Chetty, D. Tran, and R. E. Grinter. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proc. of UbiComp, pages 242--251, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Crabtree and T. Rodden. Domestic routines and and design for the home. CSCW, 13:191--220, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Darby. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Fisher. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1):79--104, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Fitzpatrick and G. Smith. Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. Pervasive, 8(1), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Froehlich. Promoting energy efficient behaviors in the home through feedback: The role of human-computer interaction, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Kempton and L. L. Layne. The consumer's energy analysis environment. Energy Policy, 22(10):857--866, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. E. A. Locke, K. N. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1):125--152, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. T. McCalley and C. J. H. Midden. Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. J. of Economic Psychology, 23(5):589--603, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Norman. Emotions and design: Attractive things work better. interactions, 9:36--42, July-August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. N. Patel, T. Robertson, J. A. Kientz, M. S. Reynolds, and G. D. Abowd. At the flick of a switch: Detecting and classifying unique electrical events. In Proc. of Ubicomp, pages 271--288, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Pierce, W. Odom, and E. Blevis. Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. In Proc. of OzCHI, pages 1--8. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Prochaska and C. DiClemente. The transtheoretical approach, pages 147--171. Oxford University, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Riche. Designing Communication Appliances to Support Aging in Place. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Paris Sud, France, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. J. Sexton, N. Brown Johnson, and A. Konakayama. Consumer response to continuous-display electricity-use monitors in a time-of-use pricing experiment. Consumer Research, 14(1):55--62, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Energy use: the human dimension, 1984. Report to Committee on Behavioral and Social Aspects of Energy Consumption and Production, National Research Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Ueno, F. Sano, O. Saeki, and K. Tsuji. Effectiveness of an energy-consumption information system on energy savings in residential houses based on monitored data. Applied Energy, 83:166--183, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. A. Winett, M. S. Neale, and H. C. Grier. Effects of self monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2):173--184, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. Wood and M. Newborough. Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader