skip to main content
research-article

A connection between partial symmetry and inverse procedural modeling

Published:26 July 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of inverse procedural modeling: Given a piece of exemplar 3D geometry, we would like to find a set of rules that describe objects that are similar to the exemplar. We consider local similarity, i.e., each local neighborhood of the newly created object must match some local neighborhood of the exemplar. We show that we can find explicit shape modification rules that guarantee strict local similarity by looking at the structure of the partial symmetries of the object. By cutting the object into pieces along curves within symmetric areas, we can build shape operations that maintain local similarity by construction. We systematically collect such editing operations and analyze their dependency to build a shape grammar. We discuss how to extract general rewriting systems, context free hierarchical rules, and grid-based rules. All of this information is derived directly from the model, without user interaction. The extracted rules are then used to implement tools for semi-automatic shape modeling by example, which are demonstrated on a number of different example data sets. Overall, our paper provides a concise theoretical and practical framework for inverse procedural modeling of 3D objects.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp115-10.mp4

mp4

39.7 MB

References

  1. Aliaga, D., Rosen, P., and Bekins, D. 2007. Style grammars for interactive visualization of architecture. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graph. 13, 4, 786--797. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barla, P., Breslav, S., Thollot, J., Sillion, F., and Markosian, L. 2006. Stroke pattern analysis and synthesis. Computer Graphics Forum 25, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bhat, P., Ingram, S., and Turk, G. 2004. Geometric texture synthesis by example. In Symp. Geometry Processing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bokeloh, M., Berner, A., Wand, M., Seidel, H.-P., and Schilling, A. 2009. Symmetry detection using line features. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cabral, M., Lefbvre, S., Dachsbacher, C., and Drettakis, G. 2009. Structure-preserving reshape for textured architectural scenes. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chen, L., and Meng, X. 2009. Anisotropic resizing of model with geometric textures. In Conf. on Geometric and Physical Modeling (SPM), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 289--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Efros, A. A., and Leung, T. K. 1999. Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Funkhouser, T., Kazhdan, M., Shilane, P., Min, P., Kiefer, W., Tal, A., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Dobkin, D. 2004. Modeling by example. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gal, R., Sorkine, O., Mitra, N., and Cohen-Or, D. 2009. iwires: An analyze-and-edit approach to shape manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gelfand, N., and Guibas, L. 2004. Shape segmentation using local slippage analysis. In Proc. Symp. Geometry Processing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hart, J., and Flynn, O. C. P. 1997. Similarity hashing: A computer vision solution to the inverse problem of linear fractals. Fractals 5, 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hertzmann, A., Jacobs, C. E., Oliver, N., Curless, B., and Salesin, D. H. 2001. Image analogies. In Proc. Siggraph 2001, 327--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ijiri, T., Měch, R., Igarashi, T., and Miller, G. 2008. An example-based procedural system for element arrangement. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kraevoy, V., Julius, D., and Sheffer, A. 2007. Shuffler: Modeling with interchangeable parts. In Pacific Graphics 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kraevoy, V., Sheffer, A., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. 2008. Non-homogeneous resizing of complex models. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kwatra, V., Schödl, A., Essa, I., Turk, G., and Bobick, A. 2003. Graphcut textures: image and video synthesis using graph cuts. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lagae, A., Dumont, O., and Dutré, P. 2005. Geometry synthesis by example. In Conf. Shape Modeling and Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lai, Y.-K., Hu, S.-M., Gu, D. X., and Martin, R. R. 2005. Geometric texture synthesis and transfer via geometry images. In Symp. Solid and Physical Modeling, 15--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Merrell, P., and Manocha, D. 2008. Continuous model synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Merrell, P. 2007. Example-based model synthesis. In Symp. Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mitra, N. J., and Pauly, M. 2008. Symmetry for architectural design. In Advances in Architectural Geometry, 13--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra, N. J., Guibas, L. J., and Pauly, M. 2006. Partial and approximate symmetry detection for 3d geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 560--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Müller, P., Wonka, P., Haegler, S., Ulmer, A., and Gool, L. V. 2006. Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 614--623. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Müller, P., Zeng, G., Wonka, P., and Gool, L. V. 2007. Image-based procedural modeling of facades. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Neubert, B., Franken, T., and Deussen, O. 2007. Approximate image-based tree-modeling using particle flows. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nguyen, M. X., Yuan, X., and Chen, B. 2005. Geometry completion and detail generation by texture synthesis. The Visual Computer 21, 9--10, 669--678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Parish, Y. I. H., and Müller, P. 2001. Procedural modeling of cities. In Proc. Siggraph 2001, 301--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pauly, M., Mitra, N. J., Wallner, J., Pottmann, H., and Guibas, L. 2008. Discovering structural regularity in 3D geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Prusinkiewicz, P., and Lindenmayer, A. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Rustamov, R. M. 2008. Augmented planar reflective symmetry transform. Vis. Comput. 24, 6, 423--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sharf, A., Alexa, M., and Cohen-Or, D. 2004. Context-based surface completion. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 878--887. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sharf, A., Blumenkrants, M., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. 2006. Snappaste: an interactive technique for easy mesh composition. The Visual Computer 22, 9, 835--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tan, P., Zeng, G., Wang, J., Kang, S. B., and Quan, L. 2007. Image-based tree modeling. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Št'ava, O., Beneš, B., Měch, R., Aliaga, D., and Krištof, P. 2010. Inverse procedural modeling by automatic generation of l-systems. Computer Graphics Forum. to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wonka, P., Wimmer, M., Sillion, F., and Ribarsky, W. 2003. Instant architecture. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 669--677. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xiao, J., Fang, T., Zhao, P., Lhuillier, M., and Quan, L. 2009. Image-based street-side city modeling. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yeh, Y.-T., and Měch, R. 2009. Detecting symmetries and curvilinear arrangements in vector art. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 2, 707--716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Zelinka, S., and Garland, M. 2006. Surfacing by numbers. In Graphics Interface 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Zhou, K., Huang, X., Wang, X., Tong, Y., Desbrun, M., and Baining Guo, H.-Y. S. 2006. Mesh quilting for geometric texture synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 690--697. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A connection between partial symmetry and inverse procedural modeling

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
          ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 29, Issue 4
          July 2010
          942 pages
          ISSN:0730-0301
          EISSN:1557-7368
          DOI:10.1145/1778765
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 July 2010
          Published in tog Volume 29, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader