skip to main content
research-article

Exploratory Analysis of Collaborative Web Accessibility Improvement

Published:01 November 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Web is becoming a platform for daily activities and is expanding the opportunities for collaboration among people all over the world. The effects of these innovations are seen not only in major Web services such as wikis and social networking services but also in accessibility services. Collaborative accessibility improvement has great potential to make the Web more adaptive. Screen reader users, developers, site owners, and any Web volunteers who want to help the users are invited into the activities to improve accessibility in a timely manner. The Social Accessibility Project is an experimental service for a new needs-driven improvement model based on collaborative metadata authoring technologies. In 20 months, about 19,000 pieces of metadata were created for more than 3,000 Web pages through collaboration based on 355 requests submitted from users. We encountered many challenges as we sought to create a new mainstream approach and created distinctive features in new user interfaces to address some of these challenges. Although the new features increased user participation, serious issues remain. The productivity of the volunteers exceeded our expectations, but we found large and important problems in the users’ lack of awareness of their own accessibility problems. This is a critical problem for sustaining the active use of the service, because about 70% of the improvement starts with a request from a user. Helping users with visual impairments understand the actual issues is a crucial and challenging topic, and will lead to improved accessibility. We first introduce examples of collaboration, analyze several kinds of statistics on the activities of the users and volunteers of the pilot service, and then discuss our findings and challenges. Five future foci are considered: site-wide metadata authoring, encouraging active participation by users, quality management for the created metadata, metadata for dynamic HTML applications, and collaborations with site owners.

References

  1. Abe, M. and Hori, M. 2001. A visual approach to authoring XPath expressions. Markup Lang. 3, 2, 191--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abe, M. and Hori, M. 2003. Robust pointing by XPath language: Authoring support and empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT’03). 156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Asakawa, C. and Takagi, H. 2008. Transcoding. In Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, S. Harper and Y. Yesilada Eds., Human-Computer Interaction Series, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Asakawa, C., Itoh, T., Takagi, T., and Miyashita. H. 2007. Accessibility evaluation for multimedia content. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI’07). 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bickmore, T. W. and Schilit, B. N. 1997. Digestor: device-independent access to the World Wide Web. In Selected Papers from the 6th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’97). 1075--1082. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bigham, J. P. and Ladner, R. E. 2007. Accessmonkey: A collaborative scripting framework for Web users and developers. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’07). 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bigham, J. P., Kaminsky, R. S., Ladner, R. E., Danielsson, O. M., and Hempton, G. L. 2006. WebInSight: Making Web images accessible. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). 181--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Borodin, Y., Mahmud, J., Ramakrishnan, I. V., and Stent, A. 2007. The HearSay non-visual Web browser. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’07). 128--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brajnik, G., Cancila, D., Nicoli, D., and Pignatelli, M. 2005. Do text transcoders improve usability for disabled users? In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A’05). 9--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Gupta, A., and Cadiz, J. J. 2001. Robust annotation positioning in digital documents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’01). 285-292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chen, C., and Raman, T. V. 2008. AxsJAX: A talking translation bot using Google IM. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’08). 105--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dardailler, D. 1997, 1998. The ALT-server. An eye for an alt. http.//www.w3.org/WAI/altserv.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferretti, S., Mirri, S., Muratori, L. A., Roccetti, M., and Salomoni, P. 2008. E-learning 2.0: you are We-LCoME! In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’08). 116--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ferretti, S., Mirri, S., Roccetti, M. and Salomoni, P. 2007. Notes for a collaboration: On the design of a wikitype educational video lecture annotation system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Semantic Computing and Multimedia Systems (IEEE SCMS’07). 651--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harper, S., Bechhofer, S., and Lunn, D. 2006. SADIe: Transcoding based on CSS. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). 259-260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kawanaka, S., Borodin, Y., Bigham, J. P., Lunn, D., Takagi, H., and Asakawa, C. 2008. Accessibility commons: A metadata infrastructure for Web accessibility. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). ACM, 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Leland, M. D., Fish, R. S., and Kraut, R. E. 1988. Collaborative document production using quilt. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’88). 206--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leuf, B. and Cunningham, W. 2001. The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lunn, D., Harper, S., and Bechhofer, S. 2009. Combining SADIe and AxsJAX to improve the accessibility of Web content. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’09). 75--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Maglio, P. and Barrett, R. 2000. Intermediaries personalize information streams. Comm. ACM 43, 8, 96--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mankoff, J., Fait, H., and Tran, T. 2005. Is your Web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing Web page accessibility for the blind. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’O5). 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Miyashita, H., Sato, D., Takagi, H., and Asakawa, C. 2007. aiBrowser for Multimedia-Introducing multimedia content accessibility for visually impaired users. In Proceedings of the Ninth International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). 91--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ntoulas, A., Cho, J., and Olston, C. 2004. What’s new on the Web? The evolution of the Web from a search engine perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’04). 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., and Pavan, P. 2006. Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). 1133--1141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Phelps, T. A. and Wilensky, R. 2000. Robust intra-document locations. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference on Computer Networks. 105--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sato, D., Kobayashi, M., Takagi, H., and Asakawa, C. 2009. What’s next? A visual editor for correcting reading order. In Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’09), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5726, Springer, 364--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Takagi, H. and Asakawa, C. 2000. Transcoding proxy for nonvisual Web access. In Proceedings of the 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’00). 164--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2002. Site-wide annotation: reconstructing existing pages to be accessible. In Proceedings of the 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’02). 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2004. Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind. In Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’04). 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Takagi, H., Kawanaka, S., Kobayashi, M., Itoh, T., and Asakawa, C. 2008. Social Accessibility: Achieving accessibility through collaborative metadata authoring. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Takagi, H., Kawanaka, S., Kobayashi, M., Sato, D., and Asakawa, C. 2009. Collaborative Web accessibility improvement: Challenges and possibilities. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computer and Accessibility (ASSETS’09). 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Takagi, H., Saito, S., Fukuda, K., and Asakawa, C. 2007. Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 3, 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vigo, M., Leporini, B., and Paternò, F. 2009. Enriching Web information scent for blind users. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’09). 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploratory Analysis of Collaborative Web Accessibility Improvement

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          George Popescu

          Beginning with naming some of the most important advantages of Internet usability, this paper focuses on accessibility for users and groups of users in terms of remote collaboration. The results center on the authors' Social Accessibility Project, through which they have collected important feedback from users over the years, and have defined collaborative accessibility improvements for disabled or elderly people accessing the Web. Two key underlying technologies to the authors' approach are metadata-based transcoding and metadata authoring. With the help of the Social Accessibility Project, site owners can make their Web pages more accessible without changing the content, by using external metadata. The authors present limitations and challenges encountered in the search for standardization models. Related work includes: Bookshare, which helps blind people access collaboratively scanned documents; Helen, a Web site that offers rating features to blind users; and Google Image Labeler, which aims to precisely label objects inside images. Apart from the technical details of how the platform works, the authors present some interesting use cases. Three success stories are offered: fixing information overload on a hospital's Web page; correcting the interface design of a radio station Web site; and identifying and fixing accessibility issues on a local foundation's Web site. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
            ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 3, Issue 2
            November 2010
            135 pages
            ISSN:1936-7228
            EISSN:1936-7236
            DOI:10.1145/1857920
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 November 2010
            • Accepted: 1 July 2010
            • Revised: 1 June 2010
            • Received: 1 December 2009
            Published in taccess Volume 3, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader