skip to main content
10.1145/2009916.2009984acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Estimation methods for ranking recent information

Published:24 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Temporal aspects of documents can impact relevance for certain kinds of queries. In this paper, we build on earlier work of modeling temporal information. We propose an extension to the Query Likelihood Model that incorporates query-specific information to estimate rate parameters, and we introduce a temporal factor into language model smoothing and query expansion using pseudo-relevance feedback. We evaluate these extensions using a Twitter corpus and two newspaper article collections. Results suggest that, compared to prior approaches, our models are more effective at capturing the temporal variability of relevance associated with some topics.

References

  1. Adar, E. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., and Elsas, J.L., 2009. The web changes everything: understanding the dynamics of web content. Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 282--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bernstein, M. Suh, B., Hong, L., Chen. J., Kairam, S., and Chi, E. 2010. Eddi: Interactive Topic-Based Browsing of Social Status Streams. UIST 2010: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. (forthcoming) (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bolstad, W.M. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Wiley-Interscience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai, N. and Davison, B.D. 2010. Freshness matters. Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '10 (Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), 114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dakka, W., Gravano, L., Ipeirotis, P., Answering General Time-Sensitive Queries, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 99, no. PrePrints, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dong, A. Zhang, R., Kolari, P., Bai, J., Diaz, F., Chang, Y., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. 2010. Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using Twitter data. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Efron, M. 2010. Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), 787--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Efron, M. and Winget, M. 2010. Questions are content: A Taxonomy of Questions in a Microblogging Environment. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Evans, B.M. and Chi, E.H. 2008. Towards a model of understanding social search. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (San Diego, CA, USA, 2008), 485--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Golovchinsky, G. and Efron, M. 2010. Making sense of Twitter search. Proc. CHI2010 Workshop on Microblogging: What and How Can We Learn From It? April 11, 2010. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S.D. 2010. The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2010), 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jones, R. and Diaz, F. 2007. Temporal profiles of queries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 25, 3 (2007), 14-es. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. King, I., and Li, J. 2009. Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Social web search and mining. (Hong Kong, China, 2009), 70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lavrenko, V. and Croft, W.B. 2001. Relevance based language models. Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (New York, NY, USA, 2001), 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Li, X. and Croft, W.B. 2003. Time-based language models. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '03 (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2003), 469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Morris, M.R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, Katrina. 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q &a behavior. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010), 1739--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pickens, J. and Golovchinsky, G. 2008. Ranked feature fusion models for ad hoc retrieval. Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 893--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ponte, J.M. and Croft, W.B. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. SIGIR 1998: Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. (1998), 275--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Robertson, S.E. Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M., and Gatford, M. 1994. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 1994) (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., and Liebling, D.J. 2010. A longitudinal study of how highlighting web content change affects people's web interactions. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10 (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010), 1353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Twitter. http://twitter.com. Accessed: 12-02--2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Voorhees, E.M. 2007. TREC: Continuing information retrieval's tradition of experimentation. Commun. ACM. 50, (Nov. 2007), 51--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yang, J. and Leskovec, J. 2011. Temporal variation in online media. ACM Internation Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '11) (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. 2001. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. CIKM 2001: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management. (2001), 403--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. 2004. A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Information Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 2, 2 (2004), 179--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhai, C. 2008. Statistical Language Models for Information Retrieval A Critical Review. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, (Mar. 2008), 137--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Estimation methods for ranking recent information

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '11: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval
      July 2011
      1374 pages
      ISBN:9781450307574
      DOI:10.1145/2009916

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader