ABSTRACT
There is great interest in understanding and influencing students' attraction to computing-related majors. This qualitative study is based on interviews with 31 students enrolled in introductory programming courses at two public universities in the United States. This paper presents a model of five factors that influence student decisions to major in CS and elaborates on our grounded theory analysis of one of these factors: how students assess their CS-related ability. We describe how students measure their ability in terms of speed, grades, and previous experience and how students make interpretations and decisions based upon these measurements. We found that students' interpretations were influenced by experiences in their environments and beliefs about ability as being fixed or malleable.
- Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. Psychological Review, 84(2).Google Scholar
- Barker, L. J., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Jackson, M. H. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proc. SIGCSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barker, L. J., McDowell, C., & Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. In Proc. SIGCSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beyer, S., Rynes, K., & Haller, S. (2004). Deterrents to women taking computer science courses. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(1).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boyle, R., Carter, J., & Clark, M. (2002). What makes them succeed? Entry, progression and graduation in Computer Science. J. Further & Higher Education, 26(1).Google Scholar
- Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proc. SIGCSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Cutts, Q., Cutts, E., Draper, S., O'Donnell, P., & Saffrey, P. (2010). Manipulating mindset to positively influence introductory programming performance. In Proc. SIGCSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2).Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Gal-Ezer, J., Shahak, D., & Zur, E. (2009). Computer science issues in high school. In Proc. ITICSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goyette, K. A., & Mullen, A. L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? J. Higher Education, 77(3).Google Scholar
- Kinnunen, P., & Malmi, L. (2006). Why students drop out CS1 course? In Proc. ICER. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lacey, A. T., & Wright, B. (2009). Employment outlook 2009-18. Monthly Labor Review, 132(11).Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1995). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. J. Vocational Behavior, 45(1).Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Lopez, Jr., A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. J. Vocational Behavior, 73(1).Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. (2007). Attitudes and beliefs about computer science among students and faculty. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the Clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding "meaning" in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(3).Google Scholar
- Murphy, L., & Thomas, L. (2008). Dangers of a fixed mindset. In Proc. ITICSE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Porter, S., & Umbach, P. (2006). College major choice. Research in Higher Education, 47.Google Scholar
- Robins, A. (2010). Learning edge momentum. Computer Science Education, 20(1).Google Scholar
- Simon, B., Hanks, B., Murphy, L., Fitzgerald, S., McCauley, R., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008). Saying isn't necessarily believing. In Proc. ICER. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613--629.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strauss, A. C., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management J., 49(4).Google Scholar
- Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2).Google Scholar
- Zweben, S. (2010). Undergraduate CS enrollment continues rising. Computing Research News, 22(3).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Deciding to major in computer science: a grounded theory of students' self-assessment of ability
Recommendations
A computer science/mathematics major for liberal arts colleges
The concepts of the model curriculum for computer science in a liberal arts college [3] and a traditional mathematics major are combined to form a computer science/mathematics major. This major is particularly suited to the mathematics faculty retrained ...
Computer Science Teaching Knowledge: A Framework and Assessment (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationEducators, researchers, politicians, tech companies, and others continue to advocate for the importance of K-12 students learning computer science in our increasingly tech-driven society. One way school districts in the United States address this ...
Why Latino High School Students Select Computer Science as a Major: Analysis of a Success Story
This article reports on a public school that is succeeding in encouraging Latino high school students to select Computer Science (CS) as a major. The students attend a charter high school designed to encourage low-income Latino students to attend ...
Comments