Michael Hewner
Mark Guzdial
ABSTRACT
As CS becomes a larger field, many undergraduate programs are giving students greater freedom in the classes that make up their degree. This study looks at the process by which students within the CS major choose to specialize in some area. In this study we interviewed student advisors, graduated CS students, and students currently in the undergraduate process about their view of CS and how they make decisions. The interviews were analyzed with grounded theory approach. The analysis presents four forces that affect student decision making. One, students often use the amount they enjoy individual classes as a sign of how well they fit with a particular specialization. Two, students often do not research, so they select specializations based on misconceptions. Three, students often rely on the curriculum to protect against poor educational choices. Four, students usually do not have a personal vision for what they hope to do with a Computer Science degree.
- A. W. Astin. What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, Jan. 1997.Google Scholar
- M. Biggers, A. Brauer, and T. Yilmaz. Student perceptions of computer science. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2008, pages 402--406, Portland, OR, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Carter. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2006, pages 27--31, Houston, Texas, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Charmaz. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd, 1 edition, Jan. 2006.Google Scholar
- Z. Dodds, R. Libeskind-Hadas, C. Alvarado, and G. Kuenning. Evaluating a breadth-first cs 1 for scientists. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 266--270, Portland, OR, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. S. Eccles. Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4):585--609, Dec. 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Furst, C. Isbell, and M. Guzdial. Threads: how to restructure a computer science curriculum for a flat world. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2007, pages 420--424, Covington, Kentucky, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geogia Tech CS Dept. BS computer science. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/future/undergraduates/bscs. Accessed 19-April-2011.Google Scholar
- T. Greening. Computer science: through the eyes of potential students. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Computer science education, pages 145--154, The University of Queensland, Australia, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hewner and M. Guzdial. Attitudes about computing in postsecondary graduates. In Proceeding of the ICER 2008, pages 71--78, Sydney, Australia, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. James. How school-leavers chose a preferred university course and possible effects on the quality of the school-university transition. Journal of Institutional Research, 9(1):78--88, 2000.Google Scholar
- J. W. McGuffee. Defining computer science. SIGCSE Bull., 32(2):74--76, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nespor. Knowledge in motion: Space, time, and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
- M. Sahami, A. Aiken, and J. Zelenski. Expanding the frontiers of computer science: designing a curriculum to reflect a diverse field. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2010, pages 47--51, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Stevens, K. O'Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos. Becoming an engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3):355--368, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- WGBH Educational Foundation and ACM. New image for computing: Report on market research. http://www.acm.org/membership/NIC.pdf, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. Wigfield, J. S. Eccles, and D. Rodriguez. The development of children's motivation in school contexts. Review of Research in Education, 23:73--118, Jan. 1998.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- How CS majors select a specialization
Recommendations
Undergraduate conceptions of the field of computer science
ICER '13: Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education researchStudents come to CS from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of preconceptions. Some initially select CS with a very vague idea of the field they are majoring in. In this paper, I describe CS undergraduates' view of the field of Computer ...
How CS undergraduates make course choices
ICER '14: Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education researchStudents in most CS curricula have to make a wide variety of educational decisions including what courses to take. Frequently, they must make these decisions based on a very limited knowledge of the content of the topics they are choosing between. In ...
Expanding the frontiers of computer science: designing a curriculum to reflect a diverse field
SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationWhile the discipline of computing has evolved significantly in the past 30 years, Computer Science curricula have not as readily adapted to these changes. In response, we have recently completely redesigned the undergraduate CS curriculum at Stanford ...
Comments