skip to main content
10.1145/2493394.2493414acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Undergraduate conceptions of the field of computer science

Published:12 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students come to CS from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of preconceptions. Some initially select CS with a very vague idea of the field they are majoring in. In this paper, I describe CS undergraduates' view of the field of Computer Science. The approach was qualitative and cognitive: I studied what students think CS is and how students reasoned about their courses and curriculum. Through the use of grounded theory in 37 qualitative interviews with students and student advisors, I extracted three different conceptions about CS found in undergraduate CS majors using Grounded Theory. Overall, students had reasonable views of CS at a high level but lacked specifics. Students had difficulty describing subfields of CS or anticipating the content of courses they selected.

References

  1. G. S. Aikenhead and A. G. Ryan. The development of a new instrument: "views on science--technology--society" (vosts). Science Education, 76(5):477--491, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Biggers, A. Brauer, and T. Yilmaz. Student perceptions of computer science. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2008, pages 402--406, Portland, OR, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Carter. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2006, pages 27--31, Houston, Texas, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Charmaz. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications Ltd, 1 edition, Jan. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Clarke. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Corbin and A. C. Strauss. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Inc, 3rd edition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. E. Foundation and ACM. New image for computing: Report on market research. http://www.acm.org/membership/NIC.pdf, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Greening. Computer science: through the eyes of potential students. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Computer science education, pages 145--154, The University of Queensland, Australia, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hewner and M. Guzdial. Attitudes about computing in postsecondary graduates. In Proceeding of ICER 2008, pages 71--78, Sydney, Australia, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. G. Lederman. Students' and teacher's conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4):331--359, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba. Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. W. McGuffee. Defining computer science. SIGCSE Bull., 32(2):74--76, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. A. Sandoval. Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4):634--656, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Undergraduate conceptions of the field of computer science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '13: Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research
      August 2013
      202 pages
      ISBN:9781450322430
      DOI:10.1145/2493394

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '13 Paper Acceptance Rate22of70submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader