skip to main content
10.1145/2043932.2043969acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering (CF), one of the most successful recommendation approaches, continues to attract interest in both academia and industry. However, one key issue limiting the success of collaborative filtering in certain application domains is the cold-start problem, a situation where historical data is too sparse (known as the sparsity problem), new users have not rated enough items (known as the new user problem), or both. In this paper, we aim at addressing the cold-start problem by incorporating human personality into the collaborative filtering framework. We propose three approaches: the first is a recommendation method based on users' personality information alone; the second is based on a linear combination of both personality and rating information; and the third uses a cascade mechanism to leverage both resources. To evaluate their effectiveness, we have conducted an experimental study comparing the proposed approaches with the traditional rating-based CF in two cold-start scenarios: sparse data sets and new users. Our results show that the proposed CF variations, which consider personality characteristics, can significantly improve the performance of the traditional rating-based CF in terms of the evaluation metrics MAE and ROC sensitivity.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A. 2005. Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 17, 6, 734--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahn, H.J. 2008. A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Inf. Sci. 178, 1, 37--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M.J. 1998. Learning Collaborative Information Filters. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (1998). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 657311, 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Burger, J.M. 2010. Personality. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, G., Wiersema, J., Ham, J. and Aroyo, L. 2009. Evaluating Interface Variants on Personality Acquisition for Recommender Systems.User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F. and Zancanaro, M., eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5535, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 259--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goldberg, K., Roeder, T., Gupta, D. and Perkins, C. 2001. Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm. Inf. Retr. 4, 2, 133--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gonzalez, G., Rosa, J.L.d.l., Montaner, M. and Delfin, S. 2007. Embedding Emotional Context in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop (2007). IEEE Computer Society, 1547669, 845--852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Good, N., Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Sarwar, B., Herlocker, J. and Riedl, J. 1999. Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. In Proc. Conf. Am. Assoc. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99) (Orlando, Florida, United States, 1999). AAAI, 315352, 439--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gosling, S., Rentfrow, P. and Swann, W. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, 6, 504--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G. and Riedl, J.T. 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 1, 5--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hu, R. and Pu, P. 2009. A comparative user study on rating vs. personality quiz based preference elicitation methods. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2009). ACM, 1502702, 367--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hu, R. and Pu, P. 2010. A Study on User Perception of Personality-Based Recommender Systems.User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, De, B., Kobsa, A. and Chin, D., eds. 6075, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 291--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Huang, Z., Chen, H. and Zeng, D. 2004. Applying associative retrieval techniques to alleviate the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 1, 116--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jung, C.G. 1971. Psychological Types. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kemp, A.E. 1996. The Music Temperament: Psychology and Personality of Musicians. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lekakos, G. and Giaglis, G.M. 2006. Improving the prediction accuracy of recommendation algorithms: Approaches anchored on human factors. Interact. Comput. 18, 3, 410--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lin, C.-H. and McLeod, D. 2002. Exploiting and Learning Human Temperaments for Customized Information Recommendation. In Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (IMSA 2002) (Kaua'i, Hawaii, USA, 2002). IASTED/ACTA Press, 218--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Linden, G., Smith, B. and York, J. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Computing, IEEE. 7, 1, 76--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Minamikawa, A. and Yokoyama, H. 2011. Blog tells what kind of personality you have: egogram estimation from Japanese weblog. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Hangzhou, China, 2011). ACM, 1958856, 217--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nguyen, A.-T., Denos, N. and Berrut, C. 2007. Improving new user recommendations with rule-based induction on cold user data. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2007). ACM, 1297251, 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nunes, M.A.S.N. 2009. Recommender Systems based on Personality Traits: Could human psychological aspects influence the computer decision-making process? VDM Verlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Park, S.-T., Pennock, D., Madani, O., Good, N. and DeCoste, D. 2006. Naïve filterbots for robust cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006). ACM, 1150490, 699--705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pazzani, M.J. 1999. A Framework for Collaborative, Content-Based and Demographic Filtering. Artif. Intell. Rev. 13, 5-6, 393--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S.D. 2003. The do re mi's of everyday life: the structure and personality correlates of music preferences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 84, 6 (Jun), 1236--1256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Resnick, P. and Varian, H.R. 1997. Recommender systems. Commun. ACM. 40, 3, 56--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J. 2000. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 2000). ACM, 352887, 158--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            RecSys '11: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
            October 2011
            414 pages
            ISBN:9781450306836
            DOI:10.1145/2043932

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 October 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

            Upcoming Conference

            RecSys '24
            18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
            October 14 - 18, 2024
            Bari , Italy

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader