skip to main content
10.1145/2047196.2047268acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Direct and gestural interaction with relief: a 2.5D shape display

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Actuated shape output provides novel opportunities for experiencing, creating and manipulating 3D content in the physical world. While various shape displays have been proposed, a common approach utilizes an array of linear actuators to form 2.5D surfaces. Through identifying a set of common interactions for viewing and manipulating content on shape displays, we argue why input modalities beyond direct touch are required. The combination of freehand gestures and direct touch provides additional degrees of freedom and resolves input ambiguities, while keeping the locus of interaction on the shape output. To demonstrate the proposed combination of input modalities and explore applications for 2.5D shape displays, two example scenarios are implemented on a prototype system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

fp392.mov

mov

36.5 MB

References

  1. Benali Khoudja, M., Hafez, M., Alexandre, J.M., Khed-dar, A. Tactile Interfaces: A State of the Art Survey. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics (2004), 721--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benko, H., and Wilson, A. 2010. Multi-point interactions with immersive omnidirectional visualizations in a dome. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Coelho, M., Ishii, H., and Maes, P. 2008. Surflex: a programmable surface for the design of tangible interfaces. In CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI EA '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3429--3434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Francica, J., 2004. Interview with Xenotran Founder, Dr. Derrick Page. In Directions Magazine. November 21st 2004, http://www.directionsmag.com/articles/interview-with-xenotran-founder-drderrick-page/12359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gargus, J., Kim, B., Rossignac, R., and Shaw, D. 2002. Finger Sculpting with Digital Clay. GVU Technical Re-port, GIT-GVU-02--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldstein, S., Campbell, J., and Mowry, T. Programmable Matter. In IEEE Computer, 38(6): 99--101, June, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Goulthorpe, M., Burry, M., and Dunlop, G. Aegis Hyposurface: The Bordering of University and Practice. In Proc. of ACADIA, 2001, Association for Computer--Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 344--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman, T., Wigdor, D., and Balakrishnan, R. 2004. Multi-finger gestural interaction with 3d volumetric displays. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Wilson, A., Hodges, S., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Butz, A. 2009. Interactions in the air: adding further depth to interactive tabletops. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hirota, K., Hirose, M. Simulation and presentation of curved surface in virtual reality environment through surface display. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS '95). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 211--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Iwata, H., Yano, H., Nakaizumi, F., and Kawamura, R. 2001. Project FEELEX: adding haptic surface to graphics. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH '01. ACM, New York, NY, 469--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Iwata, H., Yano, H., and Ono, N. 2005. Volflex. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Emerging technologies (SIGGRAPH '05), Donna Cox (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005, Article 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leithinger, D., and Ishii, H. 2010. Relief: a scalable actuated shape display. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and em-bodied interaction (TEI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 221--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nakatani, M., Kajimoto, H., Sekiguchi, D., Kawakami, N., and Tachi, S. 3D form display with shape memory alloy. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence, Tokyo, Japan, 2003, pp. 179--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakatani, M., Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., and Tachi, S. 2005. Tactile sensation with high-density pin-matrix. In Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization (APGV '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 169--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Niiyama, R. and Kawaguchi, Y. Gemotion Screen: A Generative, Emotional, Interactive 3D Display. In Proceeding of the ASIAGRAPH 2008 in Shanghai, pp.115--120, Shanghai, China, July 200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Oguchi, R., Kakehi, Y., Takahashi, K., and Naemura, T. 2008. Photonastic surface: pin matrix type display controlled with light. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 396--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Page, D. J. (2005). Reconfigurable Surface. US Patent No. 6903871 B2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J., and Yamaji, Y. 2004. Lumen: interactive visual and shape display for calm computing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Emerging Technologies (Los Angeles, California, August 08 - 12, 2004). H. Elliott-Famularo, Ed. SIGGRAPH '04. ACM, New York, NY, 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Okabe, M. Actuation and Tangible User Interfaces: the Vaucanson Duck, Robots, and Shape Displays. Proceedings of TEI'07. 2007: ACM: pp. 205--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rossignac, J., Allen, M., Book, W., Glezer, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Shaw, C., Rosen, D., Askins, S., Bai, J., Bosscher, P., Gargus, J., Kim, B.-M., Llamas, I., Nguyen, A., Yuan, G., Zhu, H. 2003. Finger Sculpting with Digital Clay: 3D Shape Input and Output through a Computer-Controlled Real Surface. smi, International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2003, pp. 29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shimojo, M.; Shinohara, M.; Fukui, Y. Human shape recognition performance for 3D tactile display. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, vol.4, no., pp.3192--3197 vol.4, 12--15 Oct 199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sutherland, I. The Ultimate Display. In International Federation of Information Processing, Vol. 2, 1965, pp. 506--508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward, F. (1985). Pin Screen. US Patent No. 4536980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Weibel, R. & Heller, M. 1991. Digital Terrain Modeling. In: Maguire, D.J., Goodchild, M.F. and Rhind, D.W. (eds.). Geographical Information Systems: Prin-ciples and Applications. London: Longman, 269--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, A. 2006. Robust computer vision-based detection of pinching for one and two-handed gesture input. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 255--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zigelbaum, J., Browning, A., Leithinger, D., Bau, O., and Ishii, H. 2010. g-stalt: a chirocentric, spatiotemporal, and telekinetic gestural interface. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, em-bedded, and embodied interaction (TEI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Direct and gestural interaction with relief: a 2.5D shape display

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            UIST '11: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
            October 2011
            654 pages
            ISBN:9781450307161
            DOI:10.1145/2047196

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 16 October 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            UIST '11 Paper Acceptance Rate67of262submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            UIST '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader