skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145239acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city

Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Local governments struggle to engage time poor and seemingly apathetic citizens, as well as the city's young digital natives, the digital locals. This project aims at providing a lightweight, technological contribution towards removing the hierarchy between those who build the city and those who use it. We aim to narrow this gap by enhancing people's experience of physical spaces with digital, civic technologies that are directly accessible within that space. This paper presents the findings of a design trial allowing users to interact with a public screen via their mobile phones. The screen facilitated a feedback platform about a concrete urban planning project by promoting specific questions and encouraging direct, in-situ, real-time responses via SMS and twitter. This new mechanism offers additional benefits for civic participation as it gives voice to residents who otherwise would not be heard. It also promotes a positive attitude towards local governments and gathers information different from more traditional public engagement tools.

References

  1. Ananny, M. and Strohecker, C. TexTales: Creating Interactive Forums with Urban Publics. In Foth, M. ed. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Australian Communications and Media Authority. ACMA Communications Report 2006-2007, Australian Communications and Media Authority, Melbourne, Australia, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y., Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Proc. Interact 2003, IOS Press (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Churchill, E. and Nelson, L., Interactive Community Bulletin Boards as Conversational Hubs and Sites for Playful Visual Repartee. In Proc. HICSS 2007, IEEE (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Churchill, E., Nelson, L., Denoue, L., Helfman, J. and Murphy, P., Sharing Multimedia Content with Interactive Public Displays: A Case Study. In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Coleman, S. and Gotze, J. Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, Hansard Society, London, UK, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, E. Created by Everybody: Engaging Participation with Mobile Interfaces, User Centered Design Group, Intel Corporation, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, E. M., Russell, D. M. and Sue, A. E., IM Here: Public Instant Messaging on Large, Shared Displays for Workgroup Interactions. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. International Association for Public Participation (IAP2). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation IAP2, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York, NY, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kavanaugh, A. L., Zin, T. T., Carroll, J. M., Schmitz, J., Manuel Perez-Quinones and Isenhour, P., When Opinion Leaders Blog: New Forms of Citizen Interaction. In Proc. dg.o 2006, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lane, G., Thelwall, S., Angus, A., Peckett, V. and West, N. Urban Tapestries - Public Authoring, Place and Mobility Proboscis - Social Tapestries, Proboscis, Southampton, UK, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lévesque, M., Bélanger, L. and Lewis, J. P2p: Cityspeak's Reconfiguration of Public Media Space. Wi: Journal of the Mobile Digital Commons Network, 1, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsden, G. Under Development Electronic Tablecloths and the Developing World. Interactions, 16, 2 (2009). 67--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Martin, K., Penn, A. and Gavin, L. Engaging with a Situated Display Via Picture Messaging. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, 2006, 1079--1084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Maunder, A. J., Marsden, G. and Harper, R., SnapAndGrab: Accessing and Sharing Contextual Multi-Media Content Using Bluetooth Enabled Camera Phones and Large Situated Displays. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McCarthy, J. F., Congleton, B. and Harper, F. M., The Context, Content & Community Collage: Sharing Personal Digital Media in the Physical Workplace. In Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McCarthy, J. F., Farnham, S. D., Patel, Y., Ahuja, S., Norman, D., Hazlewood, W. R. and Lind, J., Supporting Community in Third Places with Situated Social Software. In Proc. C&T 2009, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morrison, A., Jacucci, G. and Peltonen, P. CityWall: Limitations of a Multi-Touch Environment. In Proc. PPD 2008, ACM Press (2008), 31--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Munson, S. A., Rosengren, E. and Resnick, P., Thanks and Tweets: Comparing Two Public Displays. In Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schroeter, R. and Foth, M., Discussions in Space. In Proc. OZCHI 2009, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schroeter, R. and Houghton, K. Neo-Planning: Location-Based Social Media to Engage Australia's New Digital Locals. Australian Planner, 48, 3 (2011). 191--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Struppek, M. The Social Potential of Urban Screens. Visual Communication, 5, 2 (2006). 173--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader