skip to main content
10.1145/2157136.2157307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses

Published:29 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many computer science programs suffer from low student retention rates. At Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, academic performance and retention rates among first-year computer science students are among the lowest on campus.

In order to remedy this, we have developed a new CS0 course featuring different "tracks" that students can choose from (e.g. robotics, gaming, music, mobile apps). This allows students to learn the basics of programming, teamwork, and college-level study in a domain that is of personal interest. In addition, the course relies on classic Project-based Learning (PBL) approaches as well as a focus on both academic and non-academic factors shown to increase student retention.

Initial assessment demonstrates positive results in the form of increased academic performance in post CS0 courses and student retention.

References

  1. O. Alvarado and Z. Dodds. Women in cs: An evaluation of three promising practices. In SIGCSE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Barg, A. Fekete, T. Greening, O. Hollands, J. Kay, and J. Kingston. Problem-based learning for foundation computer science courses. Computer Science Education, 10(2):109--128, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. Atman, and L. Shuman. Characteristics of freshmen engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, pages 139--149, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Carver, L. Henderson, and et al. Increased retention of early computer science and software engineering students using pair programming. 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pages 115--122, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Coheen and L.-Y. Chen. Migrating out of computer science. Computing Research News., 15(2), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, Metcalf, Chambers, and Thakkar. A case study of retention practices at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In Proceedings of the 39th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, pages 412--416, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Dvornik, D. Janzen, J. Clements, and O. Dekhtyar. Supporting introductory test-driven labs with webide. In Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE T), 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on, pages 51 --60, may 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Fisher and J. Margolis. Unlocking the clubhouse: The carnigie mellon experience. SIGSCE Bulletin, 34(2), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Goldfinch and M. Hughes. Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Haungs, J. Clements, and D. Janzen. Improving engineering education through creativity, collaboration, and context in a first year course. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Janzen and H. Saiedian. Test-driven development: Concepts, taxonomy, and future direction. IEEE Computer, 40(2):43--50, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. V. Lotkowski, S. Robbins, and R. Noeth. The role of academic and non-academic factors in improving college retention. ACT Policy Report, www.act.org/research/policy/index.html, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Marszalek, A. Snauffer, S. Good, G. Hein, and A. Monte. Mentors improve the college experience of engineering undergraduates. Proceedings of the 2005 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. W. Pauk. How to Study in College. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Williams, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, M. Ferzli, and C. Miller. In support of pair programming in the introductory computer science course. Computer Science Education, 12(3):197--202, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2012
      734 pages
      ISBN:9781450310987
      DOI:10.1145/2157136

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate100of289submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader