skip to main content
10.1145/2157136.2157308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reshaping the image of computer science in only fifteen minutes (of class) a week

Published:29 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Low undergraduate enrollments in computer science will not meet the future demand of employers. Some reasons for the low enrollments are computer science's nerdy image, lack of understanding of the field, and low motivation for learning programming. We propose to change the image of computer science by exposing students to applications of computing and its impact on their lives through reading and discussing recent news articles in 15 minutes of class. We call this component of our courses the Broader Issues in computer science. In this paper, we present our motivation for the Broader Issues component, how we implemented the component in CS0 and CS1 courses, and our evaluation of the component, including student reactions to and impact of the component.

References

  1. Little laptop a hit in rural Peru. http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/24/laptop.village.ap/, Dec. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachelor's and associate's degrees awarded in computer sciences, by sex, 1985--2005. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/figc-2.htm, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nerd girls: Breaking the stigmas and stereotypes of women in engineering. http://www.nerdgirls.org/public/index.html, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Blank and D. Kumar. Patterns of curriculum design. In L. Cassel and R. Reis, editors, Informatics, Curricula, and Teaching Methods, pages 77 -- 86. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Boyle and M. Clark. CS: Content is not enough. In Proceedings of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), volume 36, pages 422--426, March 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cassel, L., et. al. Computer science curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001. Report from the interim review task force, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. I. O. Council. Forecast of future labor supply and demand. http://cio-nii.defense.gov/initiatives/netgenerationguide/supply_demand%.html, Apr. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Dean. Computer science takes steps to bring women to the fold. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/science/17comp.html, Apr. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Elbow. High Stakes and Low Stakes in Assigning and Responding to Writing. Jossey-Bass, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Graham and C. Latulipe. CS girls rock: sparking interest in computer science and debunking the stereotypes. In SIGCSE Bulletin, pages 322--326, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. T. N. Hartness. Working to change perceptions. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26:259--267, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Jepson and T. Perl. Priming the pipeline. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):36--39, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. A. Langer, C. Confer, and M. Sawyer. Teaching disciplinary thinking in academic coursework. In J. Mangineri and C. Block, editors, Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students, pages 81 -- 109. Harcourt Brace, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium. A 2007 model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 7, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Maney. Bin Laden's messages could be hiding in plain sight. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/2001/12/19/maney.htm, Dec. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Pogue. Laptop with a mission widens its audience. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/technology/circuits/04pogue.html, Oct. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Riordan. Researchers reveal 'extremely serious' vulnerabilities in e-voting machines. http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S15/81/65O23/index.xml, Sept. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Smith. Facebook's news feed knows what you did last summer. http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/29/facebook's-news-feed-knows-what-you-did-last-summer/, Oct. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Tedford. Using current events as a teaching tool for an undergraduate data structures course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18:50--55, April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Thompson. What is I.B.M.'s Watson? http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/magazine/20Computer-t.html, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. University of Washington Computer Science and Engineering. Why Choose CSE? http://www.cs.washington.edu/WhyCSE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Vesgo. Enrollments and degree production at US CS departments drop further in 2006-07. Computing Research News, Mar. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Voelcker. Autonomous vehicles complete DARPA urban challenge. http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov07/5717, Nov. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. W. M. Waite, M. H. Jackson, and A. Diwan. The conversational classroom. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1):127--131, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. M. Wing. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49:33--35, March 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reshaping the image of computer science in only fifteen minutes (of class) a week

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2012
      734 pages
      ISBN:9781450310987
      DOI:10.1145/2157136

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate100of289submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader