skip to main content
10.1145/2214091.2214118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Underrepresented groups in gender and STEM: the case of black males in CISE

Published:31 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The underrepresentation of Black males in the Information Technology and Computer, Information Science and Engineering (CISE) is a problem in academia and our society. Diversity and learning go hand in hand. People of different cultural, ethnic, religious, and societal backgrounds bring their various experiences with them when they come into a classroom. The more diverse the student, teacher and professor make-up, the more perspectives they can share about any given principle or concept. Therefore, heterogeneous classrooms contribute to diversity.

Having a more ethnically diverse IT field can help with the recruitment and retention of minority undergraduate students through role modeling and mentoring. The findings from this research will add to the growing body of knowledge about interventions to address underrepresentation of certain populations in the IT field. But the particular contribution is that the focus is on minority males. Researching this topic at the undergraduate level would be a starting point, but future research would allow me to study graduate students and faculty in academia to further understand underrepresentation throughout the entire academic pipeline in IT.

References

  1. Akbar, N. i. 2002. The psychological dilemma of African American academicians. In L. Jones (Ed.), Making it on broken promises (pp. 31--42). Sterling VA: StylusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Trent, W. T. 1991. Focus on equity: Race and gender differences in degree attainment, 1975--76; 1980--81. In W. R. Allen, E. G. Epps & N. Z. Haniff (Eds.), College in black and white: African American students in predominantly white and in historically black public universities. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake, M.B., Gilbert, J.E. 2010. "Black Computer Scientists in Academe: an Endangered Species?", The Chronicle of Higher Education -- Diversity in Academe September 19, 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J.J., Nao, K. 2008. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. van Anders, S. M. 2004. Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 51(9/10), 511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gallien, L. B., & Peterson, M. S. 2005. Instructing and mentoring the African American college student: Strategies for success in higher education. Boston: Pearson/Allen and Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, Z. 2001. Maintaining an open pipeline to higher education: Strategies that work. 18(8), 136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopkins, R. 1997. Educating black males: Critical lessons in schooling, community, and power. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2007, NSF 07--315 (Arlington, VA; February 2007). Available from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2009, NSF 09--305, (Arlington, VA; January 2009). Available from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, J., F.L. 2003. Toward administrative diversity: An analysis of the African American male educational pipeline. Journal of Men's Studies, 12(1), 43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Peckham, J., Harlow, L.L., Stuart, D.A., Silver, B., Mederer, H. and Stephenson, P.D. 2007. Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges, Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 9--13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jackson, L.A., Zhao ,Y., Kolenic, A., Fitzgerald, H.E., Harold, R. & Von Eye, A. 2008. Race, Gender, and Information Technology Use: The New Digital Divide. Cyber-Psychology & Behavior, 11, 4, pp. 437--442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. U.S. Census Bureau 2003: State and County Quick Facts. Data derived from Population Estimates, Census of Population and Housing, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zweben, Stuart. 2009. "Upward Trend in Undergraduate CS Enrollment; Doctoral Production Continues at Peak Levels," Computing Research News, Volume 21, Number 3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Monaghan, P. 2009. "Prison Studies", The Chronicle of Higher Education -- Field Review November 4, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. 2003. Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Watkins, S.C. 2011. The Young and the Digital: What the Migration to Social-Network Sites, Games, and Anytime, Anywhere Media Means for Our Future. Teaching theology & religion (1368--4868), 14 (1), p. 84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. and Hargittai, E. 2001. From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use As Penetration Increases. Working Paper #15, Summer 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kvasny, L. and Keil, M. 2006. "The Challenges of Redressing the Digital Divide: A Tale of Two U.S. Cities", Information Systems Journal, Vol.16. No. 1, pp. 23--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. C. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Beverly Hills: SageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pew Internet, a project of the Pew Research Center. Mobile Access 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Mobile_Access_2010.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pew Internet, a project of the Pew Research Center. Social media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. February 2010. http://67.192.40.213/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. hooks, bell 2004. We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity, New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin, A.J. 1999. Invisibility Syndrome and Racial Identity Development in Psychotherapy and Counseling African American Men. The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 761--793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Cokley, K.O. 2003. What Do We Know about the Motivation of African American Students? Challenging the "Anti-Intellectual" Myth. Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, Winter 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Cokley, K.O. 2002. Ethnicity, Gender and Academic Self-Concept: A Preliminary Examination of Academic Disidentification and Implications for Psychologists. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 379--388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Carter, R.T. and Goodwin, L. 1994. Racial Identity and Education. Review of Research in Education, Vol. 20, pp. 291--336Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cokley, K.O. 2005. Racial(ized) Identity, Ethnic Identity, and Afrocentric Values: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Understanding African American Identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 4, 517--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jackson, R. L. 1999. The Negotiation of Cultural Identity. Westport, CT: Praeger PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson, R. L. (Ed.). 2004. African American Communication and Identities: Essential Readings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, R. L. 2006. Scripting the Black Masculine Body: Identity, Discourse and Racial Politics in Popular Media. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nightingale, D.J. Cromby, J., 1999, (Eds). Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Bourdieu, P. and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. p. 119Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Gouldner, A. 1971. The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York, Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Willig, Carla, 2008. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method, Second Edition, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Malterud, K. 2001. "Qualitative research: Standards, challenges and guidelines." The Lancet. 358: pp. 483--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jootun, D., McGhee, G., Marland, G.R. 2009. Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard. 23, 23, 42--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Truex, D., Holmstrom, J., Keil, M. 2006. Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol. 7 No. 12, pp. 797--821/December 2006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Dowling, M. 2006. Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research, Nurse Researcher, 13, 3, pp. 7--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London, Hutchinson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Carolan, M. 2003. Reflexivity: a personal journey during data collection. Nurse Researcher. 10. 3. 7--14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Finlay, L. 2002. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice, Qualitative Research, 2, 209--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Trauth, E.M. 2002. "Odd Girl Out: An Individual Differences Perspective on Women in the IT Profession," Information Technology and People, Special Issue on Gender and Information Systems, Volume 15, Number 2: 98--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Howcroft, D. and Trauth, E.M. (Eds.) 2005. Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kvasny L., Trauth, E.M. 2002. "The Digital Divide at Work and at Home: Discourses about Power and Underrepresented Groups in the Information Society." Global and Organizational Discourse About Information Technology. 273--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mruck, Katja & Breuer, Franz. 2003. Subjectivity and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research-The FQS Issues {17 paragraphs}. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), Art. 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Trauth, E.M., Quesenberry, J.L. and Huang, H. 2009. "Retaining Women in the U.S. IT Workforce: Theorizing the Influence of Organizational Factors," European Journal of Information Systems, Special Issue on Meeting the Renewed Demand for IT Workers, 18, 476--497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Trauth, E.M. and Quesenberry, J.L. 2007. "Gender and the Information Technology Workforce: Issues of Theory and Practice," in Managing IT Professionals in the Internet Age. P. Yoong and S. Huff (Eds.) Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing: 18--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Trauth, E.M. 2006. Theorizing gender and information technology research using the individual differences theory of gender and IT. The Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology (pp. 1154--1159).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Underrepresented groups in gender and STEM: the case of black males in CISE

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research
            May 2012
            224 pages
            ISBN:9781450311106
            DOI:10.1145/2214091

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 31 May 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader