skip to main content
10.1145/2371574.2371600acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tilt displays: designing display surfaces with multi-axis tilting and actuation

Published:21 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a new type of actuatable display, called Tilt Displays, that provide visual feedback combined with multi-axis tilting and vertical actuation. Their ability to physically mutate provides users with an additional information channel that facilitates a range of new applications including collaboration and tangible entertainment while enhancing familiar applications such as terrain modelling by allowing 3D scenes to be rendered in a physical-3D manner. Through a mobile 3x3 custom built prototype, we examine the design space around Tilt Displays, categorise output modalities and conduct two user studies. The first, an exploratory study examines users' initial impressions of Tilt Displays and probes potential interactions and uses. The second takes a quantitative approach to understand interaction possibilities with such displays, resulting in the production of two user-defined gesture sets: one for manipulating the surface of the Tilt Display, the second for conducting everyday interactions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ashdown, M., Oka, K., and Sato, Y. Combining Head Tracking and Mouse Input for a GUI on Multiple Monitors. in CHI '05 EA. Portland, OR, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Audet, S. and Cooperstock, J. R. Shadow Removal in Front Projection Environments Using Object Tracking. in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Hinckley, K., and Gruen, R. Mouse Ether: Accelerating the Acquisition of Targets Across Multi-Monitor Displays. in CHI '04 EA. Vienna, Austria: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benko, H. and Feiner, S. Multi-Monitor Mouse. in CHI '05 EA. Portland, OR, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blackshaw, M., DeVincenzi, A., Lakatos, D., Leithinger, D., and Ishii, H. Recompose: Direct and Gestural Interaction with an Actuated Surface. in CHI EA '11: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Coelho, M., Ishii, H., and Maes, P. Surflex: A Programmable Surface for the Design of Tangible Interfaces. in CHI '08 EA. Florence, Italy: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Coelho, M. and Maes, P. Sprout I/O: A Texturally Rich Interface. in TEI '08. Bonn, Germany: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Frisken-Gibson, S. F., Bach-y-Rita, P., Tompkins, W. J., and Webster, J. G., A 64-Solenoid, Four-Level Fingertip Search Display for the Blind. IEEE Trans on Biomedical Engineering, 1987. BME-34(12): p. 963--965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S. E. Providing Dynamically Changeable Physical Buttons on A Visual Display. in CHI '0 Boston, MA, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Holtzblatt, K., Wendell, J. B., and Wood, S., Rapid Contextual Design. 2005: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwata, H., Yano, H., Nakaizumi, F., and Kawamura, R. Project FEELEX: Adding Haptic Surface to Graphics. in SIGRAPH '01: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jansen, Y., Karrer, T., and Borchers, J. MudPad: Tactile Feedback and Haptic Texture Overlay for Touch Surfaces. in ITS '10. Saarbrücken, Germany: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lahey, B., Girouard, A., Burleson, W., and Vertegaal, R. PaperPhone: Understanding the use of Bend Gestures in Mobile Devices with Flexible Electronic Paper Displays. in CHI '11. Vancouver, Canada: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leithinger, D. and Ishii, H. Relief: A Scalable Actuated Shape Display. in TEI 2010. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Leithinger, D., Lakatos, D., DeVincenzi, A., Blackshaw, M., and Ishii, H. Direct and Gestural Interaction with Relief: A 2.5D Shape Display. in UIST '11. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lucero, A., Holopainen, J., and Jokela, T. Pass-them-around: Collaborative use of Mobile Phones for Photo Sharing. in CHI '11. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lucero, A., Keränen, J., and Korhonen, H. Collaborative use of Mobile Phones for Brainstorming. in MobileHCI '10. Lisbon, Portugal: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Merrill, D., Kalanithi, J., and Maes, P. Siftables: Towards Sensor Network User Interfaces. in TEI '07. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nakatani, M., Kajimoto, H., Sekiguchi, D., Kawakami, N., and Tachi, S., 3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan Annual Conference, 2003. 8: p. 247--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J., and Yamaji, Y. Lumen: Interactive Visual and Shape Display for Calm Computing. in ACM SIGGRAPH '04 Emerging technologies. Los Angeles, California: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., and Okabe, M. Actuation and Tangible User Interfaces: The Vaucanson Duck, Robots, and Shape Displays. in TEI '07. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schwesig, C., Poupyrev, I., and Mori, E. Gummi: A Bendable Computer. in CHI '04. Vienna, Austria: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Taylor, P. M., Pollet, D. M., Hosseini-Sianaki, A., and Varley, C. J., Advances in an Electrorheological Fluid Based Tactile Array. Displays, 1998. 18(3): p. 135--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Uesugi, R., Inoue, K., Sasama, R., Arai, T., and Mae, Y. See-through Sheet Visual Display for Haptic Device Using Flexible Sheet. in ICAT '03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagner, C. R., Howe, R. D., and Lederman, S. J., A Tactile Shape Display Using RC Servomotors. HAPTICS '02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. User-Defined Gestures for Surface Computing. in CHI '09. Boston, MA, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yang, X.-D., Mak, E., McCallum, D., Irani, P., Cao, X., and Izadi, S., LensMouse: Augmenting the Mouse with an Interactive Touch Display, in CHI '10. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tilt displays: designing display surfaces with multi-axis tilting and actuation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2012
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450311052
      DOI:10.1145/2371574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader