skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441891acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we integrate theories of distributed leadership and distributed cognition to account for the roles of people and technology in online leadership. When leadership is distributed effectively, the result can be success stories like Wikipedia and Linux. However, finding a successful distribution is challenging. In the online community Newgrounds, hundreds of collaborative animation projects called "collabs" are started each year, but less than 20% are completed. We suggest that many collabs fail because leaders are overburdened and lack adequate technological support. We introduce Pipeline, a collaboration tool designed to support and transform leadership, with the goal of easing the burden on leaders of online creative projects. Through a case study of a six-week, 30-artist collaboration called Holiday Flood, we show how Pipeline supported redistributed leadership. We conclude with implications for theory and the design of social computing systems.

References

  1. Adair, M. Eric Whitacre's Virtual Choir will be unveiled Thursday. The Los Angeles Times, 2011. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2011/04/eric-whitacre-virtual-choir-revealed.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. Art Worlds. University of California Press, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal 112, 3 (2002), 369--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Boland, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V., and Te'eni, D. Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition. Organization Science 5, 3 (1994), 456--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bolden, R. Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research. International Journal of Management Reviews 13, 3 (2011), 251--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruckman, A. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected inhuman subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Inf. Technol. 4, 3 (2002), 217--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cranshaw, J. and Kittur, A. The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 1865--1874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Edwards, G. Concepts of Community: A Framework for Contextualizing Distributed Leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews 13, 3 (2011), 301--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W. A. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (2000), 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Forte, A., Larco, V., and Bruckman, A. Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems 26, 1 (2009), 49--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Galant, R. Software brings Johnny Cash back to life. CNN, 2011. http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04--21/opinion/koblin.data.art_1_images-compelling-data-users?_s=PM:OPINION.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Geiger, R. S. and Ribes, D. The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2010), 117--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gronn, P. Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13, 4 (2002), 423--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gronn, P. The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration 46, 2 (2008), 141--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gutwin, C., Penner, R., and Schneider, K. Group awareness in distributed software development. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2004), 72--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Halverson, C. A. Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? Comput. Supported Coop. Work 11, 1-2 (2002), 243--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., and Kirsh, D. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 2 (2000), 174--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hutchins, E. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science 19, 3 (1995), 265--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. A Bradford Book, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., and McDonald, D. W. Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in wikipedia through barnstars. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2008), 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Luther, K. and Bruckman, A. Leadership in online creative collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2008), 343--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Luther, K., Caine, K., Ziegler, K., and Bruckman, A. Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration. Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work, ACM (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Luther, K., Diakopoulos, N., and Bruckman, A. Edits & credits: exploring integration and attribution in online creative collaboration. Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2010), 2823--2832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mockus, A., Fielding, R. T., and Herbsleb, J. D. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 11, 3 (2002), 309--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Monroy-Hernández, A., Hill, B. M., Gonzalez-Rivero, J., and boyd, danah. Computers can't give credit: how automatic attribution falls short in an online remixing community. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 3421--3430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Nishinaka, Y., Kishida, K., and Ye, Y. Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, ACM (2002), 76--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Olson, G. M. and Olson, J. S. Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (2000), 139--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reagle, J. M. Do as I do: authorial leadership in wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, ACM (2007), 143--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1, 1 (1992), 7--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Seidman, I. Interviewing As Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education And the Social Sciences. Teachers College Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Stelter, B. An Emmy for Rebuilding a Galaxy. The New York Times, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/28/arts/television/28uncut.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Thorpe, R., Gold, J., and Lawler, J. Locating Distributed Leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews 13, 3 (2011), 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber, S. The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yukl, G. A. Leadership in Organizations. Prentice Hall College Div, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu, H., Kraut, R., and Kittur, A. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 407--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhu, H., Kraut, R. E., Wang, Y.-C., and Kittur, A. Identifying shared leadership in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 3431--3434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader