skip to main content
10.1145/2460625.2460702acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ubiquitous grasp interfaces

Published:10 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sensory hand augmentation extends the manual function spectrum from controlling analogue objects to digital or smart objects but also might add an interface to any graspable thing and therefore add a digital interface to everyday objects. We propose a finger-attached interface to control grasped objects intended to explore design parameters for always available interfaces. Our device detects finger motions and classifies them according to a set of five gestures. In user studies we found that our gesture classification has a stable performance with respect to different organic-shaped surfaces. Finally, the scalability of our approach towards generic object control will point out its potential.

References

  1. Baudisch, P., Chu, G. 2009. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proc. CHI 2009, 1923--1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fukumoto, M. and Tonomura, Y. 1997. 'Body coupled FingeRing': wireless wearable keyboard, In Proc. CHI 1997, 147--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Harrison, C., Tan, D. Morris, D. 2010. Skinput: Appropriating the Body as an Input Surface, In Proc. CHI 2010, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ketabdar.H., Yüksel, K., Roshandel, M. 2010. MagiTact: interaction with mobile devices based on compass (magnetic) sensor. In Proc. IUI 2010, 413--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rekimoto, J. 2001. GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive Wearable Interaction Devices, In Proc. ISWC 2001, 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Saponas, S., Tan, D., Morris, D., Balakrishnan, R., Tuner, J., Landay, J. 2009. Enabling Always-Available Input with Muscle-Computer Interfaces, In Proc. UIST 2009, 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tsukada, K., Yasumura, M. 2002. Ubi-Finger: Gesture Input Device for Mobile Use, In Proc. APCHI 2002, 388--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American (1991) 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wigdor, D., Forlines, C., Baudisch, P., Barnwell, J., Shen, C. 2007. LucidTouch: A See-Through Mobile Device, In Proc. UIST 2007, 269--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wolf, K., Naumann, A., Rohs, M., Müller, J. 2011. Taxonomy of microinteractions: defining microgestures based on ergonomic and scenario-dependent requirements. In Proc. INTERACT 2011, 559--575. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wolf, K., Schleicher, R., Kratz, S., Rohs, M. 2013. Tickle: A Surface independent Interaction Technique for Grasp Interfaces. In Proc. TEI 2013, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ubiquitous grasp interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '13: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction
      February 2013
      439 pages
      ISBN:9781450318983
      DOI:10.1145/2460625
      • Conference Chairs:
      • Sergi Jordà,
      • Narcis Parés

      Copyright © 2013 Author

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate48of136submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader