skip to main content
10.1145/2462932.2462956acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswikisymConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mutual evaluation of editors and texts for assessing quality of Wikipedia articles

Published:27 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a method to identify good quality Wikipedia articles by mutually evaluating editors and texts. A major approach for assessing article quality is a text survival ratio based approach. In this approach, when a text survives beyond multiple edits, the text is assessed as good quality. This approach assumes that poor quality texts are deleted by editors with high possibility. However, many vandals delete good quality texts frequently, then the survival ratios of good quality texts are improperly decreased by vandals. As a result, many good quality texts are unfairly assessed as poor quality. In our method, we consider editor quality for calculating text quality, and decrease the impacts on text qualities by the vandals who has low quality. Using this improvement, the accuracy of the text quality should be improved. However, an inherent problem of this idea is that the editor qualities are calculated by the text qualities. To solve this problem, we mutually calculate the editor and text qualities until they converge. We did our experimental evaluation, and we confirmed that the proposed method could accurately assess the text qualities.

References

  1. B. T. Adler, K. Chatterjee, L. de Alfaro, M. Faella, I. Pye, and V. Raman. Assigning Trust to Wikipedia Content. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym '08). ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. T. Adler and L. de Alfaro. A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '07), pages 261--270, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. T. Adler, K. Chatterjee, L. de Alfaro, M. Faella, I. Pye, and V. Raman. Measuting Author Contributions to the Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym '08), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Hu, E. Lim, A. Sun, H. W. Lauw, and B. Vuong. Measuring Article Quality in Wikipedia: Models and Evaluation. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2007), pages 243--252, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. M. Wilkinson and B. A. Huberman. Cooperation and quality in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis (WikiSym '07), pages 157--164. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jon M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46:604--632, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'97), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Lempel and S. Moran. SALSA: the stochastic approach for link-structure analysis. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 19(2):131--160, April 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Monika Henzinger. Link analysis in web information retrieval. IEEE DATA ENGINEERING BULLETIN, 23:3--8, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Stvilia, M. Twidale, L. Smith, and L. Gasser. Information quality work organization in wikipedia. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59(6):983--1001, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Stvilia, L. Gasser, M. B. Twidale, and L. C. Smith. A Framework for Information Quality Assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12):1720--1733, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Kramer, A. Gregorowicz, and B. Iyer. Wiki trust metrics based on phrasal analysis. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym '08), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. G. Siegler. Youtube comes to a 5-star realization: Its ratings are useless: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/22/youtube-comes-to-a-5-star-realization-its-ratings-are-useless/, September 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Wöhner and R. Peters. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '09), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong (Tony) K. Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, GROUP '07, pages 259--268, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren Terveen. Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, GROUP '09, pages 51--60, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Halfaker, A. Kittur, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. A Jury of Your peers: Quality, Experience and Ownership in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '09), pages 1--10, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peter Kin-Fong Fong and Robert P. Biuk-Aghai. What did they do? deriving high-level edit histories in wikis. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, WikiSym '10, pages 2:1--2:10, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ricardo Baeza-Yates and Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval: the concepts and technology behind search. Addison-Wesley, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. G. Toms, T. Mackenzie, C. Jordan, and S. Hall. wikiSearch: enabling interactivity in search. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2009), page 843, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Sabel. Structuring Wiki revision history. In Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis (WikiSym '07), pages 125--130. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Marti A. Hearst. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Holloway, M. Bozicevic, and K. Börner. Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3):30--40, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Otjacques, M. Cornil, and F. Feltz. Visualizing Cooperative Activities with Ellimaps: The Case of Wikipedia. In Y. Luo, editor, Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE '09), volume 5738 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 44--51. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mutual evaluation of editors and texts for assessing quality of Wikipedia articles

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WikiSym '12: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
      August 2012
      295 pages
      ISBN:9781450316057
      DOI:10.1145/2462932
      • General Chair:
      • Cliff Lampe

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WikiSym '12 Paper Acceptance Rate21of37submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate69of145submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader