skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466434acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Studying spatial memory and map navigation performance on projector phones with peephole interaction

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphones are useful personal assistants and omnipresent communication devices. However, collaboration is not among their strengths. With the advent of embedded projectors this might change. We conducted a study with 56 participants to find out if map navigation and spatial memory performance among users and observers can be improved by using a projector phone with a peephole interface instead of a smartphone with its touchscreen interface. Our results show that users performed map navigation equally well on both interfaces. Spatial memory performance, however, was 41% better for projector phone users. Moreover, observers of the map navigation on the projector phone were 25% more accurate when asked to recall locations of points of interest after they watched a user performing map navigation.

References

  1. Beardsley, P., van Baar, J., Raskar, R., and Forlines, C. Interaction using a handheld projector. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 1 (2005), 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cao, X. and Balakrishnan, R. Interacting with dynamically defined information spaces using a handheld projector and a pen. In Proc. UIST 2006, ACM (2006), 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fitzmaurice, W. G. Situated information spaces and spatially aware palmtop computers. Communications of the ACM 36, 7 (1993), 39--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hürst, W. and Bilyalov, T. Dynamic versus static peephole navigation of VR panoramas on handheld devices. In Proc. MUM 2010. ACM (2010), 25:1--25:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jetter, H.-C., Leifert, S., Gerken, J., Schubert, S., and Reiterer, H. Does (multi-)touch aid users' spatial memory and navigation in 'panning' and in 'zooming & panning' UIs? In Proc. AVI 2012, ACM (2012), 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kaufmann, B. and Ahlström, D. Revisiting peephole pointing: a study of target acquisition with a handheld projector. In Proc. MobileHCI 2012, ACM (2012), 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kaufmann, B. and Hitz, M. X-Large virtual workspaces for projector phones through peephole interaction. In Proc. MM 2012, ACM (2012), 1279--1280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mehra, S., Werkhoven, P., and Worring, M. Navigating on handheld displays: dynamic versus static peephole navigation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 4 (2006), 448--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rapp, S. Spotlight Navigation: a pioneering user interface for mobile projection. In Proc. Ubiprojection, Workshop on personal projection at Pervasive (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rohs, M., Schöning, J., Raubal, M., Essl, G., and Krüger, A. Map navigation with mobile devices: virtual versus physical movement with and without visual context. In Proc. ICMI 2007, ACM (2007), 146--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tan, D. S., Pausch, R., Stefanucci, J. K., and Proffitt, D. R. Kinesthetic cues aid spatial memory. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2000, ACM (2002), 806--807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yee, K. Peephole displays: pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Studying spatial memory and map navigation performance on projector phones with peephole interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader