skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Métamorphe: augmenting hotkey usage with actuated keys

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hotkeys are an efficient method of selecting commands on a keyboard. However, these shortcuts are often underused by users. We present Métamorphe, a novel keyboard with keys that can be individually raised and lowered to promote hotkeys usage. Métamorphe augments the output of traditional keyboards with haptic and visual feedback, and offers a novel design space for user input on raised keys (e.g., gestures such as squeezing or pushing the sides of a key). We detail the implementation of Métamorphe and discuss design factors. We also report two user studies. The first is a user-defined interface study that shows that the new input vocabulary is usable and useful, and provides insights into the mental models that users associate with raised keys. The second user study shows improved eyes-free selection performance for raised keys as well as the surrounding unraised keys.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chi0650-file3.mp4

mp4

79.5 MB

References

  1. Bau, O., Petrevski, U., and Mackay, W. (2009) BubbleWrap: A Textile Based Electromagnetic Haptic Display. CHI EA'09, 3607--3612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004) Designing Interaction, not Interfaces. AVI '04, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bewley, W. L., Roberts, T. L., Sehroit, D., and Verplank, W. L. (1983) Human Factors Testing in the Design of Xerox's 8010 "Star" Office Workstation. CHI '83, 72--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Block, F., Gellersen, G., and Villar, N. (2010) Touch-Display Keyboards: Transforming Keyboards into Interactive Surfaces. CHI '10, 1145--1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Campbell, C. S., Zhai, S., May, K. W., and Maglio, P. P. (1999) What You Feel Must be What You See: Adding Tactile Feedback to the Trackpoint. INTERACT '99, 383--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Paradox of the Active User. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987, pp 80--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dietz, P., H., Eidelson, B., Westhues, J., and Bathiche, S. (2009) A Practical Pressure Sensitive Computer Keyboard. UIST '09, 55--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fitzmaurice, G., Matejka, J., Khan A., Glueck M., and Kurtenbach, G. (2008) PieCursor: Merging Pointing and Command Selection for Rapid In-place Tool Switching. CHI '08, 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grossman, T., Dragicevic, P., and Balakrishnan, R. (2007) Strategies for Accelerating On-line Learning of Hotkeys. CHI '07, 1591--1600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S. E. (2009) Providing Dynamically Changeable Physical Buttons on a Visual Display. CHI '09, 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hoffmann, D., Spelmezan, D., and Borchers, J. (2009) TypeRight: a Keyboard with Tactile Error Prevention. CHI '09, 2265--2268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S. A., and Johnston, J. (2008) Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. CHI '08, 1573--1582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Huynh, K., Stepp, C.E., White, L.W., Colgate, J.E., and Matsuoka, Y. Finding a feature on a 3D object through single-digit haptic exploration. IEEE Haptics Symposium '10, 83--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jorgensen, A., Garde, A., Laursen, B., and Jensen, B. Using Mouse and Keyboard Under Time pressure: Preference, Strategies and Learning. Behavior and Information Tech. 21, 5 (2002), 317--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kato, J., Sakamoto, D., and Igarashi, T. (2010) Surfboard: Keyboard with Microphone as a Low-cost Interactive Surface. UIST '10, 387--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kim, S., Kim, H., Lee, B., Nam, T.-J., and Lee, W. (2008) Inflatable Mouse: Volume-adjustable Mouse with Air- pressure-sensitive Input and Haptic Feedback. CHI '08, 211--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Krisler, B., and Alterman, R. (2008) Training Towards Mastery: Overcoming the Active User Paradox. NordiCHI '08, 239--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kurtenbach, G. The Design and Evaluation of Marking Menus. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lane, D. M., Napier, A. H., Peres, C. S., and Sándor, A. The Hidden Costs of Graphical User Interfaces: The Failure to Make the Transition from Menus and Icon Tool Bars to Keyboard Shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18, 2 (2005), 133--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lederman, S.J., and Klatzky, R. L. Hand Movements: A Window Into Haptic Object Recognition. Cog. Psych. 19, 3 (1987), 342--368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, J. R., Potosnak, K. M., and Magyar, R. L. Keys and Keyboards. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, P. V. Prabhu. Handbook of HumanComputer Interaction. Elsevier, 1997, 1285--1311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Loy, C., Lai, W., and Lim, C. Development of a Pressure-based Typing Biometrics User Authentication System. Tech. rep., University of Science Malaysia & MIMOS Berhad, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lylykangas, J., Surakka, V., Salminen, K., Raisamo, J., Laitinen, P., Rönning, K., and Raisamo, R. (2011) Designing Tactile Feedback for Piezo Buttons. CHI '11, 3281--3284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McLoone, H., Hinckley, K., and Cutrell, E. (2003) Bimanual Interaction on the Microsoft Office Keyboard. INTERACT '03, 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Microsoft Adaptive Keyboard. http://www.microsoft.com/appliedsciences/content/projects/uist.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufman, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Optimus Maximus Keyboard, ArtLebedev Studios. http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peres, S. C., Ii, F. P. T., Fleetwood, M. D., Chung, P., and Paige-Smith, D. L. Keyboard Shortcut Usage: The roles of Social Factors and Computer Experience. In Proc. of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting 2004, 803--807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J., and Yamaji, Y. (2004) Lumen: Interactive Visual and Shape Display for Calm Computing. SIGGRAPH '04, 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., and Okabe, M. (2007) Actuation and Tangible User Interfaces: The Vaucanson Duck, Robots, and Shape Displays. TEI '07, 206--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rasmussen, M. K., Pedersen E. W., Petersen, M. G., and Hornbæk, K. (2012) Shape-Changing Interfaces: A Review of the Design Space and Open Research Questions. CHI '12, 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Reflex Keyboard, Smartfish Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rekimoto, J., Ishizawa, T., Schwesig, C., and Oba, H. (2003) PreSense: Interaction Techniques for Finger Sensing Input Devices. UIST '03, 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Richter H., and Wiethoff, A. (2011) EdgeMatrix: Remote Tactile Feedback on Interactive Surfaces using a Shape Display. TEI '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rutledge, J. D., and Selker, T. (1990) Force-to-Motion Functions for Pointing. INTERACT '90, 701--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Savioz, G., Markovic, M., & Pierrard, Y. (2011) Towards multi-finger haptic devices: A computer keyboard with adjustable force feedback. ICEMS '11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., and Quinn, P. (2011) Dips and Ceilings: Understanding and Supporting Transitions to Expertise in User Interfaces. CHI '11, 2741--2750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Weiss, M., Schwarz, F., Jakubowski, S., and Borchers, J. (2010) Madgets: Actuating Widgets on Interactive Tabletops. UIST '10, 293--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Weiss, M., Remy, C., and Borchers, J. (2011) Rendering Physical Effects in Tabletop Controls. CHI '11, 3009--3012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Westerman, W. Hand Tracking, Finger Identification, And Chordic Manipulation On A Multi-Touch Surface. Ph.D Thesis, U. of Delaware, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wigdor, D. and Wixon, D. Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture. Morgan Kaufman, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wilson, A. D. (2006) Robust Computer Vision-Based Detection of Pinching for One and Two-Handed Gesture Input. UIST '06, 255--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. (2009) User-Defined Gestures for Surface Computing. CHI '09, 1083--1092 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Métamorphe: augmenting hotkey usage with actuated keys

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader