skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481421acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bezel-Tap gestures: quick activation of commands from sleep mode on tablets

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Bezel-Tap Gestures, a novel family of interaction techniques for immediate interaction on handheld tablets regardless of whether the device is alive or in sleep mode. The technique rests on the close succession of two input events: first a bezel tap, whose detection by accelerometers will awake an idle tablet almost instantly, then a screen contact. Field studies confirmed that the probability of this input sequence occurring by chance is very low, excluding the accidental activation concern. One experiment examined the optimal size of the vocabulary of commands for all four regions of the bezel (top, bottom, left, right). Another experiment evaluated two variants of the technique which both allow two-level selection in a hierarchy of commands, the initial bezel tap being followed by either two screen taps or a screen slide. The data suggests that Bezel-Tap Gestures may serve to design large vocabularies of micro-interactions with a sleeping tablet.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chi0293-file3.mp4

mp4

31.6 MB

References

  1. ADXL335 Accelerometer, Analog Devices. http://www.analog.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arduino Nano board. http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardNanoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashbrook, D. Enabling mobile microinteractions. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Asbrook, D., Baudisch, P., White, S. Nenya: Subtle and Eyes-Free Mobile Input with a Magnetically-Tracked Finger Ring. In Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM, 2043--2046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Baglioni, M., Lecolinet, E. and Guiard, Y. Jerktilts: Using accelerometers for eight-choice selection on mobile devices. In Proc. of ICMI 2011, ACM, 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bragdon, A. et al. Experimental Analysis of Touch-Screen Gesture Designs in Mobile Environments. In Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM, 403--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Buxton, W. A three-state model of graphical input. In Proc. of Interact 1990, Elsevier, 449--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Carroll, A. and Heiser, G. An analysis of power consumption in a smartphone. In Proc. of USENIXATC 2010, USENIX, 21--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Consolvo, S. et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proc. of CHI 2008, ACM, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Control 4, Smart Home products. http://www.control4.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Francone J. et al. Wavelet Menus on Handheld Devices: Stacking Metaphor for Novice Mode & Eyes-Free Selection for Expert Mode. In Proc. of AVI 2010, ACM, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jain, M. and Balakrishnan, R. User Learning and Performance with Bezel Menus. In Proc. of CHI 2012, ACM, 2221--2230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Harrison, C., Schwarz, J., Hudson, S. TapSense: Enhancing Finger Interaction on Touch Surfaces. In Proc. of UIST 2011, ACM, 627--634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Heo, S., Lee, G. ForceTap: Extending the Input Vocabulary of Mobile Touch Screens by adding Tap Gestures. In Proc. of MobileHCI 2011, ACM, 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hinckley, K. et al. Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. In Proc. of UIST 2000, ACM, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hinckley, K. et al. Design and Analysis of Delimiters for Selection-Action Pen Input Phrases in Scriboli. In Proc. of CHI 2005, ACM, 451--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hinckley, K., Yatani, K. Radial Menus With Bezel Gestures. Publication date: 08/25/2011. Patent publication number 20110209093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hudson, S. et al. Whack Gestures: Inexact and Inattentive Interaction with Mobile Devices. In Proc. of TEI 2010, ACM, 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Identity Fraud Report. Javelin Strategy (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kane, S. et al. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. In Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM, 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kin, K., Hartmann, B., Agrawala, M. Two-handed marking menus for multitouch devices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18(3): 16 (2011) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kurtenbach, G. and Buxton, W. 1991. Issues in combining marking and direct manipulation techniques. In Proc. of UIST 1991, ACM, 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Li, F., Guy, R., Yatani, K., Truong, K. The 1Line Keyboard: A QWERTY Layout in a Single Line. In Proc. of UIST 2011, ACM, 461--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. LIS3DH 3-axis accelerometer, STMicroelectronics. http://www.st.com/internet/analog/product/250725.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu, H. et al. The jigsaw continuous sensing engine for mobile phone applications. In Proc. of SenSys 2010, ACM, 71--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Olwal, A., Feiner, S., Heyman, S. (2008). Rubbing and Tapping for precise and rapid selection on touch-screen displays. In Proc. of CHI 2008, ACM, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Raikonen, S. et al. Tap Input as an Embedded Interaction Method for Mobile Devices. In Proc. of TEI 2007, ACM, 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Roth, V., Turner, T. Bezel Swipe: Conflict-Free Scrolling and multiple selection on mobile screen devices. In Proc. of CHI 2009, ACM, 1523--1526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Roudaut, A., Lecolinet, E. and Guiard, Y. Microrolls: Expanding Touch-Screen Input Vocabulary by Distinguishing Rolls vs. Slides of the Thumb. In Proc. of CHI 2009, ACM, 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ruiz, J. and Li, Y. Doubleflip: a motion gesture delimiter for mobile interaction. In Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM, 2717--2720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shin, C., Hong, J-H., and Dey, A. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. In Proc. of UbiComp 2012, ACM, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tsekelves, E. et al. Interacting with Digital Media at Home via a Second Screen. In Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia Workshops (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Understanding Tablet Device Users. AdMob/Google, US (March 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wagner, J., Huot, S., Mackay, W. BiTouch and BiPad: Designing Bimanual Interaction for Hand-held Tablets. In Proc. of CHI 2012, ACM, 2317--2326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bezel-Tap gestures: quick activation of commands from sleep mode on tablets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader