ABSTRACT
We introduce UltraHaptics, a system designed to provide multi-point haptic feedback above an interactive surface. UltraHaptics employs focused ultrasound to project discrete points of haptic feedback through the display and directly on to users' unadorned hands. We investigate the desirable properties of an acoustically transparent display and demonstrate that the system is capable of creating multiple localised points of feedback in mid-air. Through psychophysical experiments we show that feedback points with different tactile properties can be identified at smaller separations. We also show that users are able to distinguish between different vibration frequencies of non-contact points with training. Finally, we explore a number of exciting new interaction possibilities that UltraHaptics provides.
Supplemental Material
- Alexander, J., Marshall, M. T., and Subramanian, S. Adding haptic feedback to mobile tv. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1975--1980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., and Harrison, C. Teslatouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 283--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Berkelman, P. J., Butler, Z. J., and Hollis, R. L. Design of a hemispherical magnetic levitation haptic interface device. In Proc. ASME HAPTICS 1996 (1996), 17--22.Google Scholar
- Biet, M., Giraud, F., and Lemaire-Semail, B. Implementation of tactile feedback by modifying the perceived friction. The European Physical Journal Applied Physics 43 (2008), 123--135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dalecki, D., Child, S., Raeman, C., and Carstensen, E. Tactile perception of ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (1995), 3165--3170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ebbini, E. S., and Cain, C. a. Multiple-focus ultrasound phased-array pattern synthesis: optimal driving-signal distributions for hyperthermia. IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr. 36, 5 (1989), 540--548.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Filonenko, E. A., Gavrilov, L. R., Khokhlova, V. A., and Hand, J. W. Heating of biological tissues by two-dimensional phased arrays with random and regular element distributions. Acoust. Phys. 50, 2 (2004), 222--231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fukuhara, S., Kageyama, S., Tai, Y., and Yoshida, K. An acoustically transparent screen. J. Audio Eng. Soc 42, 12 (1994), 1020--1023.Google Scholar
- Gavrilov, L. Use of focused ultrasound for stimulation of nerve structures. Ultrasonics 22, 3 (1984), 132 -- 138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gavrilov, L. The possibility of generating focal regions of complex configurations in application to the problems of stimulation of human receptor structures by focused ultrasound. Acoust. Phys. 54 (2008), 269--278.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gavrilov, L., and Tsirulnikov, E. Mechanisms of Stimulation Effects of Focused Ultrasound on Neural Structures: Role of Nonlinear Effects. Nonlinear Acoust. at the Beginning of the 21st Cent. (2002), 445--448.Google Scholar
- Gavrilov, L., and Tsirulnikov, E. Focused ultrasound as a tool to input sensory information to humans (review). Acoust. Phys. 58 (2012), 1--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gavrilov, L. R., Gersuni, G. V., Ilyinski, O. B., Tsirulnikov, E. M., and Shchekanov, E. E. A Study of Reception with the Use of Focused Ultrasound. I. Effects on the Skin and Deep Receptor Structures in Man. Brain Research 135, 2 (1977), 265--277.Google Scholar
- Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Pope, J. V., and Verrillo, R. T. A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation. Somatosensory & Motor Research 19, 2 (2002), 114--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison, C., and Hudson, S. E. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 299--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoshi, T. Development of aerial-input and aerial-tactile-feedback system. In World Haptics Conference, 2011 IEEE (2011), 569--573.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoshi, T., Takahashi, M., Iwamoto, T., and Shinoda, H. Noncontact tactile display based on radiation pressure of airborne ultrasound. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 3 (2010), 155 --165. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iwamoto, T., Tatezono, M., and Shinoda, H. Non-contact method for producing tactile sensation using airborne ultrasound. In Proc. EuroHaptics 2008, Springer-Verlag (2008), 504--513. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iwata, H., Yano, H., Nakaizumi, F., and Kawamura, R. Project feelex: adding haptic surface to graphics. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press (2001), 469--476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jansen, Y., Karrer, T., and Borchers, J. Mudpad: localized tactile feedback on touch surfaces. In Adj. Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 385--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, K. O. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11, 4 (2001), 455--461.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, K. O., and Phillips, J. R. Tactile spatial resolution. i. two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology 46, 6 (1981), 1177--1192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, J. C., Dietz, P. H., Leigh, D., Yerazunis, W. S., and Hudson, S. E. Haptic pen: a tactile feedback stylus for touch screens. In Proc. UIST 2004, ACM Press (2004), 291--294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Mao, Y., Zhu, Y. Y., Yang, Z., Chan, C. T., and Sheng, P. Locally Resonant Sonic Materials. Science 289, 5485 (2000), 1734--1736.Google Scholar
- Marshall, M., Carter, T., Alexander, J., and Subramanian, S. Ultra-tangibles: creating movable tangible objects on interactive tables. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 2185--2188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massie, T. H., and Salisbury, K. J. Phantom haptic interface: a device for probing virtual objects. vol. 55-1 of Proc. ASME 1994, ASME (1994), 295--299.Google Scholar
- Obrist, M., Seah, S. A., and Subramanian, S. Talking about tactile experiences. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 1659--1668. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pendry, J. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Physical Review Letters 85, 18 (Oct. 2000), 3966--3969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perez, C., Holzmann, C., and Jaeschke, H. Two-point vibrotactile discrimination related to parameters of pulse burst stimulus. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 38, 1 (2000), 74--79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rekimoto, J. Senseablerays: opto-haptic substitution for touch-enhanced interactive spaces. In Ext. Absstracts CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 2519--2528. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wakatsuki, T., and Fukunishi, T. Acoustical characteristics of a sound screen for hdtv. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 95 (10 1993).Google Scholar
- Weiss, M., Wacharamanotham, C., Voelker, S., and Borchers, J. Fingerflux: near-surface haptic feedback on tabletops. In Proc. UIST 2011, ACM Press (2011), 615--620. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wusheng, C., Tianmiao, W., and Lei, H. Design of data glove and arm type haptic interface. In Proc. HAPTICS 2003 (2003), 422 -- 427. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- UltraHaptics: multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces
Recommendations
Bringing everyday applications to interactive surfaces
UIST '10: Adjunct proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyThis paper presents ongoing work that intends to simplify the introduction of everyday applications to interactive tabletops. SLAP Widgets bring tangible general-purpose widgets to tabletops while providing the flexibility of on-screen controls. Madgets ...
Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center
IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenResearch on children's interactions with touchscreen devices has examined small and large screens and compared interaction to adults or among children of different ages. Little work has explicitly compared interaction on different platforms, however. ...
FingerFlux: near-surface haptic feedback on tabletops
UIST '11: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyWe introduce FingerFlux, an output technique to generate near-surface haptic feedback on interactive tabletops. Our system combines electromagnetic actuation with permanent magnets attached to the user's hand. FingerFlux lets users feel the interface ...
Comments