skip to main content
10.1145/2501988.2502051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Good vibrations: an evaluation of vibrotactile impedance matching for low power wearable applications

Published:08 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vibrotactile devices suffer from poor energy efficiency, arising from a mismatch between the device and the impedance of the human skin. This results in over-sized actuators and excessive power consumption, and prevents development of more sophisticated, miniaturized and low-power mobile tactile devices. In this paper, we present the experimental evaluation of a vibrotactile system designed to match the impedance of the skin to the impedance of the actuator. This system is able to quadruple the motion of the skin without increasing power consumption, and produce sensations equivalent to a standard system while consuming 1/2 of the power. By greatly reducing the size and power constraints of vibrotactile actuators, this technology offers a means to realize more sophisticated, smaller haptic devices for the user interface community.

References

  1. Zelek, J. S., Bromley, S., Asmar, D., & Thompson, D. (2003). A haptic glove as a tactile-vision sensory substitution for wayfinding. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 97(10), 621--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jiang, I., Ishikawa, Y., Lindsay, J., Hannaford, B. Design and Optimization of Support Structures for Tactile Feedback, IEEE World Haptics Conference, Daejeon, Korea, 2013, In Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lindsay, J., Adams, R., and Hannaford, B., Improving Tactile Feedback with an Impedance Adapter, IEEE World Haptics Conference, Daejeon, Korea, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Precision MicroDrives, www.precisionmicrodrives.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Moore, T. J., & Mundie, J. R. (1972). Measurement of specific mechanical impedance of the skin: Effects of static force, site of stimulation, area of probe, and presence of a surround. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lamoré, P. J. J., & Keemink, C. J. (1988). Evidence for different types of mechanoreceptors from measurements of the psychophysical threshold for vibrations under different stimulation conditions. JASA, 83, 2339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Verrillo, R. T., Fraioli, A. J., & Smith, R. L. (1969). Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(6), 366--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Hardick, K.R., (2001). The frequency selectivity of information-processing channels in the tactile sensory system. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 18(3), 191--20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Good vibrations: an evaluation of vibrotactile impedance matching for low power wearable applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '13: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2013
      558 pages
      ISBN:9781450322683
      DOI:10.1145/2501988

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '13 Paper Acceptance Rate62of317submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader