skip to main content
10.1145/2501988.2502036acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TextTearing: opening white space for digital ink annotation

Published:08 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Having insufficient space for making annotations is a problem that afflicts both paper and digital documents. We introduce the TextTearing technique for in situ expansion of inter-line whitespace and pair it with a lightweight interaction for margin expansion as a way to address this problem. The full system leverages the dynamism of digital documents and employs a bimanual design that combines the precision of pen with the fluidity of touch. Our evaluation found that a simpler unimanual variant of TextTearing was preferred over direct annotation and margin-only expansion. Direct annotation in naturally occurring whitespace was least preferred.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uist349.mp4

mp4

37.6 MB

References

  1. Agrawala, M. and Shilman, M. DIZI: a digital ink zooming interface for document annotation. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2005, (2005), 69--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chang, B.-W., Mackinlay, J.D., Zellweger, P.T., and Igarashi, T. A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. In Proc. UIST 1998, ACM Press (1998) , 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., and Alexander, J. Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Golovchinsky, G. and Denoue, L. Moving markup: Repositioning Freeform Annotations. In Proc. UIST 2002, ACM Press (2002), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Golovchinsky, G., Price, M.N., and Schilit, B.N. From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries. In Proc. SIGIR 1999, ACM Press (1999), 19--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Guiard, Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. Journal of motor behavior 19, 4 (1987), 486--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Ramos, G., and Guimbretiere, F. Design and analysis of delimiters for selection-action pen gesture phrases in scriboli. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 451--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hinckley, K., Bi, X., Pahud, M., and Buxton. B. Informal information gathering techniques for active reading. In Proc. CHI '12 (2012), 1893--1896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hinckley, K., Yatani, K., Pahud, M., et al. Pen + touch = new tools. In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Marshall, C.C. Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. In Proc. DL 1997, ACM Press (1997), 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marshall, C.C. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proc. HYPERTEXT 1998, ACM Press (1998), 40--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pearson, J., Buchanan, G., and Thimbleby, H. Improving annotations in digital documents. In Proc. ECDL 2009, Springer-Verlag (2009), 429--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pearson, J., Buchanan, G., and Thimbleby, H. The reading desk: applying physical interactions to digital documents. In Proc CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 3199--3202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sellen, A. and Harper, R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Song, H., Benko, H., Guimbretiere, F., Izadi, S., Cao, X., and Hinckley, K. Grips and gestures on a multi-touch pen. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1323--1332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tashman, C.S. and Edwards, W.K. LiquidText: a flexible, multitouch environment to support active reading. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 3285--3294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R. Occlusion-aware interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zeleznik, R., Bragdon, A., Adeputra, F., and Ko, H.-S. Hands-on math: a page-based multi-touch and pen desktop for technical work and problem solving. In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TextTearing: opening white space for digital ink annotation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '13: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2013
      558 pages
      ISBN:9781450322683
      DOI:10.1145/2501988

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '13 Paper Acceptance Rate62of317submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader