skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531696acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adolescent online safety: the "moral" of the story

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Adolescence is characterized by heightened risk-taking and independence from parents; these tendencies seem to be magnified by the opportunities afforded through online interactions. Drawing on Kohlberg's Cognitive Moral Development (CMD) theory, we conduct a qualitative study of 12 parent-adolescent dyads that examines the interplay between parenting behaviors and adolescent moral development. We show an association between adolescent moral judgment and online behavior, and we illustrate how parenting style and mediation strategies influence the teen's moral growth and decision making about online behaviors. We also note that parental mediation strategies are moderated by parents' digital literacy: reduced digital literacy is associated with more restrictive or indulgent strategies; while more digitally competent parents are more likely to monitor and mediate their teen's behaviors as they engage online. We also found that experience, not restriction, facilitates the teen's moral growth.

References

  1. Baumrind, D. A developmental perspective on adolescent risk taking in contemporary America. New directions for child development, 37 (1987), 93--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D. The Influence of Parenting Style on Adolescent Competence and Substance Use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 1 (1991), 56--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baumrind, D. Patterns of parental authority and adolescent autonomy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005, 108 (2005), 61--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bradley, K. Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 108 (2005), 57--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Crossler, R. E., Bélanger, F., Hiller, J. S., Park, J.-M., Hsiao, M., Channakeshava, K., Bian, K. and Korbich, E. Determinants of Protection Behaviors for Online Privacy of Children. In Proc. 39th Annual Meeting of The Decision Sciences Institute (2008), 1641--1647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Defalco, B. Teen convicted under Internet piracy law. 2005, http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2005-03-07-az-teen-downloader-convicted_x.htm?csp=34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S. and Hofschire, L. Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 3 (2006), 486--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. ISTTF. Enhancing Child Safety and Online Technologies. Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, 2008, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/ISTTF_Final_Report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohlberg, L. The Development of Children's Orientations Toward a Moral Order. Human Development, 6, 1--2 (1963), 11--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kohlberg, L. Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialisation. In D. A. Goslin (ed.) Handbook of Socialisation Theory and Research, (1969), 347--480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L. and Dornbusch, S. M. Patterns of Competence and Adjustment among Adolescents from Authoritative, Authoritarian, Indulgent, and Neglectful Families. Child Development, 62, 5 (1991), 1049--1065.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lerner, R. M. Adolescence: Development, diversity, context, and application. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Leung, L. and Lee, P. S. N. The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media & Society, 14, 1 (2012), 117--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. and Ólafsson, K. Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. EU Kids Online, 2011, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S. and Miyazaki, A. D. Protecting children's privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84, 2 (2008), 205--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Malin, J. and Fowers, B. Adolescent self-control and music and movie piracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 3 (2009), 718--722. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Malin, J. and Fowers, B. Adolescent self-control and music and movie piracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 2009 (2009), 718--722. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nunner-Winkler, G., Meyer-Nikele, M. and Wohlrab, D. Gender Differences in Moral Motivation Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 1 (2007), 26--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Press, A. Father of gay teen who committed suicide plans nationwide walk against bullying. 2013, http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/04/father-of-bullied-gay-teen-who-committed-suicide-plans-nationwide-walk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sorbring, E. and Lundin, L. Mothers' and fathers' insights into teenagers' use of the internet. New Media & Society, 14, 7 (2012), 1181--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M. and Darling, N. Impact of Parenting Practices on Adolescent Achievement: Authoritative Parenting, School Involvement, and Encouragement to Succeed. Child Development, 63, 5 (1992), 1266--1281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B. and Rots, I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55, 2 (2010), 454--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L. and Marseille, N. M. Developing A Scale to Assess Three Styles of Television Mediation: "Instructive Mediation," "Restrictive Mediation," and "Social Coviewing". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 1 (1999), 52--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Walsh, J. Man Admits Meeting Teen Online and Keeping Her as Sex Slave. 2006, http://www.wktv.com/news/new-york-state/2813571.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yardi, S. A. Social Media at the Boundaries: Supporting Parents in Managing Youth's Social Media Use. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Adolescent online safety: the "moral" of the story

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
      February 2014
      1600 pages
      ISBN:9781450325400
      DOI:10.1145/2531602

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader