nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure

verfasst von : Zainab Agha, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Bridget McHugh, Pamela Wisniewski

Erschienen in: HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Parental mediation is a key factor that influences adolescents’ exposure to online risk. Yet, research on this topic has mostly been cross-sectional and correlative, not exploring whether the relationship between parental mediation and adolescent online risk exposure could be bi-directional, where teens’ risk exposure influences parenting practices. To address this gap, we conducted an eight week, repeated measures web-based diary study with 68 adolescents (aged 13–17) and their parents to examine the relationships between three parental mediation strategies (active mediation, monitoring, and restriction) and three adolescent online risk types (explicit content, sexual solicitations, and online harassment) teens reported encountering online. Overall, parents and teens had significantly different perceptions regarding parental mediation, which yielded some consistent and conflicting results. Parents and teens agreed that parental restriction significantly increased the week in which the teen encountered all three risk types, and active mediation increased during the week in which the teen encountered online harassment. Parents and teens also consistently reported that restriction significantly decreased the week after an online harassment incident. Overall, we found that parental mediation and teen online risk exposure were most often significantly correlated in the same week, suggesting parenting occurred ‘just-in-time,’ rather than parents and teens’ behaviors bi-directionally influencing one another significantly from week-to-week. Our findings provide new insights into parent-teen perspectives on parental mediation and highlight the bi-directional relationship of parental mediation and online risk. We offer recommendations to facilitate ‘just in time’ parenting and provide teens with the necessary support to help keep them safe online.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Privacy Design Strategies and the GDPR: A Systematic Literature Review

Nächstes Kapitel Understanding User Behavior, Information Exposure, and Privacy Risks in Managing Old Devices

Livingstone, S., Smith, P.K.: Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 55, 635–654 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197CrossRef

Anderson, M.: A Majority of Teens Have Experienced Some Form of Cyberbullying. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/09/27/a-majority-of-teens-have-experienced-some-form-of-cyberbullying/. Accessed 03 Oct 2019

Yardi, S.A.: Social Media at the Boundaries: Supporting Parents in Managing Youth’s Social Media Use. ProQuest LLC (2012)

Ashktorab, Z., Vitak, J.: Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3895–3905. Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548

Lee, S.-J.: Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: effective for what and for whom? New Media Soc. 15, 466–481 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452412CrossRef

Livingstone, S., Helsper, E.J.: Parental mediation of children’s internet use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media. 52, 581–599 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Eastin, M.S., Greenberg, B.S., Hofschire, L.: Parenting the internet. J. Commun. 56, 486–504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.xCrossRef

Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., Rots, I.: Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Comput. Educ. 55, 454–464 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009CrossRef

Lee, S.-J., Chae, Y.-G.: Balancing participation and risks in children’s internet use: the role of internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Networking. 15, 257–262 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0552CrossRef

10.

Mendoza, K.: Surveying parental mediation: connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. J. Media Literacy Educ. 1, 3 (2013)

11.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K.: The perspective of European children. 171 (2011)

12.

Lwin, M., Stanaland, A., Miyazaki, A.: Protecting children’s privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. J. Retail. 84, 205–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004CrossRef

13.

Sorbring, E., Lundin, L.: Mothers’ and fathers’ insights into teenagers’ use of the internet. New Media Soc. 14, 1181–1197 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440160CrossRef

14.

Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J., Rosson, M.B.: Grand challenges of researching adolescent online safety: a family systems approach. In: AMCIS 2013 Proceedings (2013)

15.

Cummings, E.M., Bergman, K.N., Kuznicki, K.A.: Emerging methods for studying families as systems. In: McHale, S.M., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds.) Emerging Methods in Family Research. pp. 95–108. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_6.

16.

Valkenburg, P.M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A.L., Marseille, N.M.: Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: Instructive mediation, restrictive mediation, and social coviewing. J Broadcast. Electron. Media. 43, 52–66 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474CrossRef

17.

Ghosh, A.K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Rosson, M.B., Xu, H., Carroll, J.M., Wisniewski, P.J.: A matter of control or safety?: Examining parental use of technical monitoring apps on teens’ mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 1–14. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768

18.

Badillo-Urquiola, K., Chouhan, C., Chancellor, S., De Choudhary, M., Wisniewski, P.: Beyond parental control: designing adolescent online safety apps using value sensitive design. J. Adolesc. Res. 35, 147–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419884692CrossRef

19.

Erickson, L.B., Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Perkins, D.F.: The boundaries between: parental involvement in a teen’s online world. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 1384–1403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23450CrossRef

20.

Ghosh, A.K., Hughes, C.E., Wisniewski, P.J.: Circle of trust: a new approach to mobile online safety for families. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376747

21.

Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Parents just don’t understand: why teens don’t talk to parents about their online risk experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2017, pp. 523–540. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998236

22.

Cranor, L.F., Durity, A.L., Marsh, A., Ur, B.: Parents’ and teens’ perspectives on privacy in a technology-filled world. In: Presented at the 10th Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2014) (2014)

23.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K.: Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. https://www.eukidsonline.net/. Accessed 02 Feb 2021

24.

Yardi, S., Bruckman, A.: Social and technical challenges in parenting teens’ social media use. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3237–3246. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979422

25.

Blackwell, L., Gardiner, E., Schoenebeck, S.: Managing expectations: technology tensions among parents and teens. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2016, pp. 1388–1399. ACM Press, San Francisco, California, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819928

26.

Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Preventative vs. Reactive: how parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. pp. 302–316. Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675293

27.

Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S.Y., Kientz, J.A.: Not at the dinner table: parents’ and children’s perspectives on family technology rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. pp. 1376–1389. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940

28.

Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J.: challenging online behaviors of youth: findings from a comparative analysis of young people in the United States and New Zealand. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271532CrossRef

29.

Ghosh, A.K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Guha, S., LaViola Jr, J.J., Wisniewski, P.J.: Safety vs. Surveillance: what children have to say about mobile apps for parental control. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2018, pp. 1–14. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173698

30.

Schermerhorn, A.C., Cummings, E.M., Davies, P.T.: Children’s representations of multiple family relationships: organizational structure and development in early childhood. J. Family Psychol. 22, 89–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.89CrossRef

31.

Kitzman-Ulrich, H., Wilson, D.K., St. George, S.M., Lawman, H., Segal, M., Fairchild, A.: The integration of a family systems approach for understanding youth obesity, physical activity, and dietary programs. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 13, 231–253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0073-0

32.

Day, I.: A family systems approach to the understanding and treatment of internet gaming disorder. Family J. 25, 264–270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717711108CrossRef

33.

Koning, I.M., Peeters, M., Finkenauer, C., van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M.: Bidirectional effects of Internet-specific parenting practices and compulsive social media and Internet game use. J. Behav. Addict. 7, 624–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.68CrossRef

34.

Kenny, D.A., Harackiewicz, J.M.: Cross-lagged panel correlation: practice and promise. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(4), 372–379 (1979)CrossRef

35.

Kenny, D.: Cross-lagged panel correlation: a test for spuriousness. Psychol. Bull. 82, 887–903 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.887CrossRef

36.

Volonte, M., Anaraky, R.G., Knijnenburg, B., Duchowski, A.T., Babu, S.V.: Empirical evaluation of the interplay of emotion and visual attention in human-virtual human interaction. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019. pp. 1–9. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3343036.3343118

37.

Yao, M.Z., Zhong, Z.: Loneliness, social contacts and Internet addiction: a cross-lagged panel study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 164–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.007CrossRef

38.

Quartana, P.J., Wickwire, E.M., Klick, B., Grace, E., Smith, M.T.: Naturalistic changes in insomnia symptoms and pain in temporomandibular joint disorder: a cross-lagged panel analysis. PAIN®. 149, 325–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.029

39.

Aguinis, H., Boik, R.J., Pierce, C.A.: A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organ. Res. Methods 4, 291–323 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810144001CrossRef

40.

Fisher, R.J.: Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consum. Res. 20, 303–315 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1086/209351CrossRef

41.

Bray, L., Carter, B., Sanders, C., Blake, L., Keegan, K.: Parent-to-parent peer support for parents of children with a disability: a mixed method study. Patient Educ. Couns. 100, 1537–1543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.004CrossRef

42.

Masaki, H., Shibata, K., Hoshino, S., Ishihama, T., Saito, N., Yatani, K.: Exploring nudge designs to help adolescent SNS users avoid privacy and safety threats. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376666

43.

Badillo-Urquiola, K., Shea, Z., Agha, Z., Lediaeva, I., Wisniewski, P.: Conducting risky research with teens: co-designing for the ethical treatment and protection of adolescents. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 231:1–231:46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432930

44.

Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, pp. 348–372 (2006)

45.

Czeskis, A., et al.: Parenting from the pocket: value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent-teen mobile safety. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. pp. 1–15. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1837110.1837130

46.

Agha, Z., Chatlani, N., Razi, A., Wisniewski, P.: Towards conducting responsible research with teens and parents regarding online risks. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383073

47.

Kearney, M.: Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis. Presented at the January 1 (2017)

48.

Mund, M., Nestler, S.: Beyond the cross-lagged panel model: next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course. Adv. Life Course Res. 41, 100249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.10.002

Titel: ‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure
verfasst von: Zainab Agha
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky
Karla Badillo-Urquiola
Bridget McHugh
Pamela Wisniewski
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77391-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-77392-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"