skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998236acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Parents Just Don't Understand: Why Teens Don't Talk to Parents about Their Online Risk Experiences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Past research has shown that parents tend to underestimate the frequency with which their teens experience online risks. However, little is known about whether and how teens communicate with their parents when online risks do occur. In a two-month, web-based diary study of 68 teen-parent pairs, participants provided separate accounts of the teens' weekly online risk experiences. We found that most teens had little or no communication with their parents regarding their online risk experiences, and parents and teens shared very different perceptions and reactions when risks were reported, helping explain why communication was so poor. We discuss the implications of our results and make recommendations for how researchers and designers may work to improve the state of family communication regarding adolescent online risks in the future.

References

  1. D. M. Ackard, D. Neumark-Sztainer, M. Story, and C. Perry. 2006. Parent-child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Haleama Al Sabbah, Carine A. Vereecken, Frank J. Elgar, et al. 2009. Body weight dissatisfaction and communication with parents among adolescents in 24 countries: international cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 9, 1: 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Morgan G. Ames, Janet Go, Joseph "Jofish" Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding Technology Choices and Values Through Social Class. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Monica Anderson. 2016. Parents, Teens and Digital Monitoring. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved May 22, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/01/07/parents-teensand-digital-monitoring/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lindsay Blackwell, Emma Gardiner, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. Managing Expectations: Technology Tensions Among Parents and Teens. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1390--1401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. danah boyd. 2014. It's Complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sahara Byrne, Sherri Jean Katz, Theodore Lee, Daniel Linz, and Mary McIlrath. 2014. Peers, Predators, and Porn: Predicting Parental Underestimation of Children's Risky Online Experiences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 2: 215--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Mark Cummings, Kathleen N. Bergman, and Kelly A. Kuznicki. 2014. Emerging Methods for Studying Families as Systems. In Emerging Methods in Family Research, Susan M. McHale, Paul Amato and Alan Booth (eds.). Springer International Publishing, 95--108. Retrieved May 25, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--31901562-0_6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Francine Dehue, Catherine Bolman, and Trijntje Völlink. 2008. Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 11, 2: 217--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Duerager and S. Livingstone. 2012. How can parents support children's internet safety? Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/ParentalMediation. pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robin Dutra, Kim S. Miller, and Rex Forehand. 1999. The Process and Content of Sexual Communication with Adolescents in Two-Parent Families: Associations with Sexual Risk-Taking Behavior. AIDS and Behavior 3, 1: 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39, 2: 175--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. FOSI. Good Digital Parenting. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from https://www.fosi.org/good-digital-parenting/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marcie C. Goeke-Morey, E. Mark Cummings, and Lauren M. Papp. 2007. Children and Marital Conflict Resolution: Implications for Emotional Security and Adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology 21, 4: 744--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Elisheva F. Gross, Jaana Juvonen, and Shelly L. Gable. 2002. Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence. Journal of Social Issues 58, 1: 75--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kilem L. Gwet. 2010. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 4th Edition: The Definitive Guide to Measuring The Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Advanced Analytics, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sameer Hinduja and Justin W. Patchin. 2008. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence 31, 1: 125--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alexis Hiniker, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Not at the Dinner Table: Parents' and Children's Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1376--1389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lauren J. Human, Meanne Chan, Anita DeLongis, Laura Roy, Gregory E. Miller, and Edith Chen. 2014. Parental accuracy regarding adolescent daily experiences: relationships with adolescent psychological adjustment and inflammatory regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine 76, 8: 603--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Haiyan Jia, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Risk-taking As a Learning Process for Shaping Teen's Online Information Privacy Behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 583--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lisa M. Jones, Kimberly J. Mitchell, and David Finkelhor. 2012. Trends in Youth Internet Victimization: Findings From Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys 2000-2010. Journal of Adolescent Health 50, 2: 179--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ascan F. Koerner and Mary Anne Fitzpatrick. 2002. Toward a Theory of Family Communication. Communication Theory 12, 1: 70--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jean-Philippe Laurenceau and Niall Bolger. 2005. Using Diary Methods to Study Marital and Family Processes. Journal of Family Psychology 19, 1: 86--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Amanda Lenhart. 2015. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved July 13, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-socialmedia-technology-2015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Amanda Lenhart, Monica Anderson, and Aaron Smith. 2015. Teens, Technology and Romantic Relationships. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved May 14, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/01/teens-technology-and-romantic-relationships/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Albert Kienfie Liau, Angeline Khoo, and Peng Hwa Ang. 2008. Parental Awareness and Monitoring of Adolescent Internet Use. Current Psychology 27, 4: 217--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Saskia Kunnen, and Paul van Geert. 2010. Adolescent Girls' Perceptions of Daily Conflicts With Their Mothers: Within-Conflict Sequences and Their Relationship to Autonomy. Journal of Adolescent Research 25, 4: 527--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Heather Richter Lipford and Mary Ellen Zurko. 2012. Someone to Watch over Me. Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, ACM, 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke Görzig, and Kjartan Ólafsson. 2011. Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonia Livingstone and Ellen Helsper. 2010. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society 12, 2: 309--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Joseph McGrath. 1981. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2015. This Digital Life: A Neighborhood-Based Study of Adolescents' Lives Online. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2305--2314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Emma Sorbring and Linda Lundin. 2012. Mothers' and fathers' insights into teenagers' use of the internet. New Media & Society 14, 7: 1181--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. A.L. Strauss and J.M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=wTwYUnHYsmMCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard H Thaler and Cass Sunstein. 2008. Nudge?: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, NJ & London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Patti M. Valkenburg, Marina Krcmar, Allerd L. Peeters, and Nies M. Marseille. 1999. Developing A Scale to Assess Three Styles of Television Mediation: "Instructive Mediation," "Restrictive Mediation," and "Social Coviewing." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, 1: 52--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Marjut Wallenius and Raija-Leena Punamäki. 2008. Digital game violence and direct aggression in adolescence: A longitudinal study of the roles of sex, age, and parent-child communication. Special Issue Honoring Irving E. Siegel's contributions to the field 29, 4: 286--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Adolescent Online Safety: The "Moral" of the Story. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1258--1271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Na Wang, et al. 2015. Resilience Mitigates the Negative Effects of Adolescent Internet Addiction and Online Risk Exposure. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4029--4038. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. "Preventative" vs. "Reactive": How Parental Mediation Influences Teens' Social Media Privacy Behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 302--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Jack Carroll, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Grand Challenges of Researching Adolescent Online Safety: A Family Systems Approach. Retrieved May 25, 2016 from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/SocialTechnicalIssues/GeneralPresentations/10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, Daniel F. Perkins, and John M. Carroll. 2016. Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3919--3930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Heng Xu and Tamara Dinev. 2012. The security-liberty balance: individuals' attitudes towards internet government surveillance. Electronic Government, An International Journal 9, 1: 46--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2012. Income, Race, and Class: Exploring Socioeconomic Differences in Family Technology Use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3041--3050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Michele L. Ybarra, Dorothy L. Espelage, and Kimberly J. Mitchell. 2007. The Co-occurrence of Internet Harassment and Unwanted Sexual Solicitation Victimization and Perpetration: Associations with Psychosocial Indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health 41, 6, Supplement: S31--S41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. 2014. The 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing Conference Program. Retrieved from http://cscw.acm.org/2014/cscw2014_program.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. What statistical analysis should I use? Statistical analyses using Stata. Retrieved May 20, 2016 from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/whatstat/whatstat.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Comprehensive Sex Education: Research and Results. Retrieved August 4, 2016 from http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/1487Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Common Sense Media. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Covenant Eyes. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from http://www.covenanteyes.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Parents Just Don't Understand: Why Teens Don't Talk to Parents about Their Online Risk Experiences

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader