ABSTRACT
Past research has shown that parents tend to underestimate the frequency with which their teens experience online risks. However, little is known about whether and how teens communicate with their parents when online risks do occur. In a two-month, web-based diary study of 68 teen-parent pairs, participants provided separate accounts of the teens' weekly online risk experiences. We found that most teens had little or no communication with their parents regarding their online risk experiences, and parents and teens shared very different perceptions and reactions when risks were reported, helping explain why communication was so poor. We discuss the implications of our results and make recommendations for how researchers and designers may work to improve the state of family communication regarding adolescent online risks in the future.
- D. M. Ackard, D. Neumark-Sztainer, M. Story, and C. Perry. 2006. Parent-child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30.Google Scholar
- Haleama Al Sabbah, Carine A. Vereecken, Frank J. Elgar, et al. 2009. Body weight dissatisfaction and communication with parents among adolescents in 24 countries: international cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 9, 1: 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morgan G. Ames, Janet Go, Joseph "Jofish" Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding Technology Choices and Values Through Social Class. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 55--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monica Anderson. 2016. Parents, Teens and Digital Monitoring. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved May 22, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/01/07/parents-teensand-digital-monitoring/Google Scholar
- Lindsay Blackwell, Emma Gardiner, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. Managing Expectations: Technology Tensions Among Parents and Teens. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1390--1401. Google ScholarDigital Library
- danah boyd. 2014. It's Complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sahara Byrne, Sherri Jean Katz, Theodore Lee, Daniel Linz, and Mary McIlrath. 2014. Peers, Predators, and Porn: Predicting Parental Underestimation of Children's Risky Online Experiences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 2: 215--231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Mark Cummings, Kathleen N. Bergman, and Kelly A. Kuznicki. 2014. Emerging Methods for Studying Families as Systems. In Emerging Methods in Family Research, Susan M. McHale, Paul Amato and Alan Booth (eds.). Springer International Publishing, 95--108. Retrieved May 25, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--31901562-0_6Google Scholar
- Francine Dehue, Catherine Bolman, and Trijntje Völlink. 2008. Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 11, 2: 217--223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Duerager and S. Livingstone. 2012. How can parents support children's internet safety? Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/ParentalMediation. pdfGoogle Scholar
- Robin Dutra, Kim S. Miller, and Rex Forehand. 1999. The Process and Content of Sexual Communication with Adolescents in Two-Parent Families: Associations with Sexual Risk-Taking Behavior. AIDS and Behavior 3, 1: 59--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39, 2: 175--191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- FOSI. Good Digital Parenting. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from https://www.fosi.org/good-digital-parenting/Google Scholar
- Marcie C. Goeke-Morey, E. Mark Cummings, and Lauren M. Papp. 2007. Children and Marital Conflict Resolution: Implications for Emotional Security and Adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology 21, 4: 744--753.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elisheva F. Gross, Jaana Juvonen, and Shelly L. Gable. 2002. Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence. Journal of Social Issues 58, 1: 75--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kilem L. Gwet. 2010. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 4th Edition: The Definitive Guide to Measuring The Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Advanced Analytics, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
- Sameer Hinduja and Justin W. Patchin. 2008. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence 31, 1: 125--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexis Hiniker, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Not at the Dinner Table: Parents' and Children's Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1376--1389. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lauren J. Human, Meanne Chan, Anita DeLongis, Laura Roy, Gregory E. Miller, and Edith Chen. 2014. Parental accuracy regarding adolescent daily experiences: relationships with adolescent psychological adjustment and inflammatory regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine 76, 8: 603--610.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haiyan Jia, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Risk-taking As a Learning Process for Shaping Teen's Online Information Privacy Behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 583--599. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa M. Jones, Kimberly J. Mitchell, and David Finkelhor. 2012. Trends in Youth Internet Victimization: Findings From Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys 2000-2010. Journal of Adolescent Health 50, 2: 179--186.Google Scholar
- Ascan F. Koerner and Mary Anne Fitzpatrick. 2002. Toward a Theory of Family Communication. Communication Theory 12, 1: 70--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean-Philippe Laurenceau and Niall Bolger. 2005. Using Diary Methods to Study Marital and Family Processes. Journal of Family Psychology 19, 1: 86--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amanda Lenhart. 2015. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved July 13, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-socialmedia-technology-2015/Google Scholar
- Amanda Lenhart, Monica Anderson, and Aaron Smith. 2015. Teens, Technology and Romantic Relationships. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved May 14, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/01/teens-technology-and-romantic-relationships/Google Scholar
- Albert Kienfie Liau, Angeline Khoo, and Peng Hwa Ang. 2008. Parental Awareness and Monitoring of Adolescent Internet Use. Current Psychology 27, 4: 217--233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Saskia Kunnen, and Paul van Geert. 2010. Adolescent Girls' Perceptions of Daily Conflicts With Their Mothers: Within-Conflict Sequences and Their Relationship to Autonomy. Journal of Adolescent Research 25, 4: 527--556.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heather Richter Lipford and Mary Ellen Zurko. 2012. Someone to Watch over Me. Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, ACM, 67--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke Görzig, and Kjartan Ólafsson. 2011. Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/Google Scholar
- Sonia Livingstone and Ellen Helsper. 2010. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society 12, 2: 309--329.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph McGrath. 1981. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25, 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2015. This Digital Life: A Neighborhood-Based Study of Adolescents' Lives Online. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2305--2314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emma Sorbring and Linda Lundin. 2012. Mothers' and fathers' insights into teenagers' use of the internet. New Media & Society 14, 7: 1181--1197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.L. Strauss and J.M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=wTwYUnHYsmMCGoogle Scholar
- Richard H Thaler and Cass Sunstein. 2008. Nudge?: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, NJ & London, U.K.Google Scholar
- Patti M. Valkenburg, Marina Krcmar, Allerd L. Peeters, and Nies M. Marseille. 1999. Developing A Scale to Assess Three Styles of Television Mediation: "Instructive Mediation," "Restrictive Mediation," and "Social Coviewing." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, 1: 52--66.Google Scholar
- Marjut Wallenius and Raija-Leena Punamäki. 2008. Digital game violence and direct aggression in adolescence: A longitudinal study of the roles of sex, age, and parent-child communication. Special Issue Honoring Irving E. Siegel's contributions to the field 29, 4: 286--294.Google Scholar
- Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Adolescent Online Safety: The "Moral" of the Story. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1258--1271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Na Wang, et al. 2015. Resilience Mitigates the Negative Effects of Adolescent Internet Addiction and Online Risk Exposure. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4029--4038. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. "Preventative" vs. "Reactive": How Parental Mediation Influences Teens' Social Media Privacy Behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 302--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Jack Carroll, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Grand Challenges of Researching Adolescent Online Safety: A Family Systems Approach. Retrieved May 25, 2016 from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/SocialTechnicalIssues/GeneralPresentations/10Google Scholar
- Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, Daniel F. Perkins, and John M. Carroll. 2016. Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3919--3930. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heng Xu and Tamara Dinev. 2012. The security-liberty balance: individuals' attitudes towards internet government surveillance. Electronic Government, An International Journal 9, 1: 46--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2012. Income, Race, and Class: Exploring Socioeconomic Differences in Family Technology Use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3041--3050. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michele L. Ybarra, Dorothy L. Espelage, and Kimberly J. Mitchell. 2007. The Co-occurrence of Internet Harassment and Unwanted Sexual Solicitation Victimization and Perpetration: Associations with Psychosocial Indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health 41, 6, Supplement: S31--S41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 2014. The 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing Conference Program. Retrieved from http://cscw.acm.org/2014/cscw2014_program.pdfGoogle Scholar
- What statistical analysis should I use? Statistical analyses using Stata. Retrieved May 20, 2016 from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/whatstat/whatstat.htmGoogle Scholar
- Comprehensive Sex Education: Research and Results. Retrieved August 4, 2016 from http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/1487Google Scholar
- Common Sense Media. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/Google Scholar
- Covenant Eyes. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from http://www.covenanteyes.com/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Parents Just Don't Understand: Why Teens Don't Talk to Parents about Their Online Risk Experiences
Recommendations
Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn our study, 68 teens spend two months reflecting on their weekly online experiences and report 207 separate risk events involving information breaches, online harassment, sexual solicitations, and exposure to explicit content. We conduct a structured, ...
Most Teens Bounce Back: Using Diary Methods to Examine How Quickly Teens Recover from Episodic Online Risk Exposure
Cross-sectional research suggests that online risk exposure (e.g., cyberbullying, sexual solicitations, and explicit content) may negatively impact teens, increasing concerns over the risks teens are exposed to online. Yet, there has been little ...
‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure
HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and TrustAbstractParental mediation is a key factor that influences adolescents’ exposure to online risk. Yet, research on this topic has mostly been cross-sectional and correlative, not exploring whether the relationship between parental mediation and adolescent ...
Comments