Abstract
Recommender systems have already proved to be valuable for coping with the information overload problem in several application domains. They provide people with suggestions for items which are likely to be of interest for them; hence, a primary function of recommender systems is to help people make good choices and decisions. However, most previous research has focused on recommendation techniques and algorithms, and less attention has been devoted to the decision making processes adopted by the users and possibly supported by the system. There is still a gap between the importance that the community gives to the assessment of recommendation algorithms and the current range of ongoing research activities concerning human decision making. Different decision-psychological phenomena can influence the decision making of users of recommender systems, and research along these lines is becoming increasingly important and popular. This special issue highlights how the coupling of recommendation algorithms with the understanding of human choice and decision making theory has the potential to benefit research and practice on recommender systems and to enable users to achieve a good balance between decision accuracy and decision effort.
- Gediminas Adomavicius, Jesse Bockstedt, Shawn Curley, and Jingjing Zhang. 2011a. Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems. 35--42.Google Scholar
- Gediminas Adomavicius, Bamshad Mobasher, Francesco Ricci, and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2011b. Context-aware recommender systems. AI Magazine 32, 3, 67--80.Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, and JohnW. Payne. 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25, 3, 187--217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bo and Izak Benbasat. 2007. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. 31, 1, 137--209. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2009. Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19, 3, 167--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li Chen, Wen Wu, and Liang He. 2013. How personality influences users’ needs for recommendation diversity. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 829--834. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Cosley, Shyong K. Lam, Istvan Albert, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2003. Is seeing believing?: How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM, New York, 585--592. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hillel J. Einhorn and Robin M. Hogarth. 1981. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgement and choice. J. Accounting Res. 19, 1--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Felfernig, Erich Teppan, and Bartosz Gula. 2007. Knowledge-based recommender technologies for marketing and sales. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 21, 2, 333--354. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ijprai/ijprai21.html#FelfernigTG07.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Felfernig, Christoph Zehentner, Gerald Ninaus, Harald Grabner, Walid Maaleij, Dennis Pagano, Leopold Weninger, and Florian Reinfrank. 2012. Group decision support for requirements negotiation. In Advances in User Modeling, Liliana Ardissono and Tsvi Kuflik Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7138, Springer, 105--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gerd Gigerenzer. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Gonzalez, Beatriz Lopez, and Josep Lluis de la Rosa. 2002. The emotional factor: An innovative approach to user modelling for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems Workshop on Recommendation and Personalization in e-Commerce. 90--99.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Gonzalez, Josep Lluis de la Rosa, Miquel Montaner, and Sonia Delfin. 2007. Embedding emotional context in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop (ICDEW’07). IEEE, 845--852. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David M. Grether and Charles R. Plott. 1979. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. Amer. Econ. Rev. 69, 4, 623--638.Google Scholar
- Gerald Häubl and Valerie Trifts. 2000. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19, 1, 4--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2009. Acceptance issues of personality-based recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys’09). ACM, New York, 221--224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Jameson. 2004. More than the sum of its members: Challenges for group recommender systems. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 48--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Noam Tractinsky, and Michael Vitale. 2000. Consumer trust in an internet store. Inf. Tech. Management 1, 1--2, 45--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Kahneman. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
- Norbert L. Kerr, Robert J. MacCoun, and Geoffrey P. Kramer. 1996. Bias in judgement: Comparing individuals and groups. Psych. Rev. 103, 4, 687--719.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarah Lichtenstein and Paul Slovic Eds. 2006. The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Monika Mandl, Alexander Felfernig, Erich Teppan, and Monika Schubert. 2011. Consumer decision making in knowledge-based recommendation. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 37, 1, 1--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel McFadden. 1999. Rationality for economists? J. Risk Uncertainty 19, 1, 73--105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John W. Payne, James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2005. Integrating tradeoff support in product search tools for e-commerce sites. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’05). ACM, New York, 269--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2006. Trust building with explanation interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’06). ACM, New York, 93--100. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1111449.1111475. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Paul B. Kantor. 2011. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbert Simon. 1955. A behavioral model of choice. Quart. J. Economics 69, 1, 99--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. H. Teo Thompson and Yon Ding Yeong. 2003. Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace. Omega 31, 5, 349--363.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caleb Warren, A. Peter McGraw, and Leaf Van Boven. 2010. Values and preferences: Defining preference construction. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cognitive Sci. 2, 2, 193--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jingjing Zhang. 2011. Anchoring effects of recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11). ACM, New York, 375--378. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems
Recommendations
RecSys'11 workshop on human decision making in recommender systems
RecSys '11: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systemsInteracting with a recommender system means to take different decisions such as selecting a song/movie from a recommendation list, selecting specific feature values (e.g., camera's size, zoom) as criteria, selecting feedback features to be critiqued in ...
RecSys'12 workshop on human decision making in recommender systems
RecSys '12: Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systemsInteracting with a recommender system means to take different decisions such as selecting an item from a recommendation list, selecting a specific item feature value (e.g., camera's size, zoom) as a search criteria, selecting feedback features to be ...
Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (#IntRS)
RecSys '15: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender SystemsAs an interactive intelligent system, recommender systems are developed to give recommendations that match users' preferences. Since the emergence of recommender systems, a large majority of research focuses on objective accuracy criteria and less ...
Comments