skip to main content
10.1145/2619239.2626296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: evidence from a large video streaming service

Published:17 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing ABR algorithms face a significant challenge in estimating future capacity: capacity can vary widely over time, a phenomenon commonly observed in commercial services. In this work, we suggest an alternative approach: rather than presuming that capacity estimation is required, it is perhaps better to begin by using only the buffer, and then ask when capacity estimation is needed. We test the viability of this approach through a series of experiments spanning millions of real users in a commercial service. We start with a simple design which directly chooses the video rate based on the current buffer occupancy. Our own investigation reveals that capacity estimation is unnecessary in steady state; however using simple capacity estimation (based on immediate past throughput) is important during the startup phase, when the buffer itself is growing from empty. This approach allows us to reduce the rebuffer rate by 10-20% compared to Netflix's then-default ABR algorithm, while delivering a similar average video rate, and a higher video rate in steady state.

References

  1. S. Akhshabi et al. An Experimental Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In ACM MMSys, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Akhshabi et al. What Happens When HTTP Adaptive Streaming Players Compete for Bandwidth? In ACM NOSSDAV, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Balachandran et al. Analyzing the Potential Benefits of CDN Augmentation Strategies for Internet Video Workloads. In ACM IMC, October 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Balachandran et al. Developing a Predictive Model of Quality of Experience for Internet Video. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. D. Cicco et al. An Experimental Investigation of the Akamai Adaptive Video Streaming. In USAB, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. D. Cicco et al. ELASTIC: a Client-side Controller for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH). In IEEE Packet Video Workshop, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. F. Dobrian et al. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T.-Y. Huang et al. Confused, Timid, and Unstable: Picking a Video Streaming Rate is Hard. In ACM IMC, November 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T.-Y. Huang et al. A Buffer-Based Approach to Video Rate Adaptation. Technical report, 2014. http://yuba.stanford.edu/~huangty/bba_report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Jiang et al. Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in http-based adaptive video streaming with festive. In ACM CoNEXT, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. S. Krishnan et al. Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs. In ACM IMC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Z. Li et al. Probe and adapt: Rate adaptation for http video streaming at scale. In http://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.0510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. X. Liu et al. A Case for a Coordinated Internet Video Control Plane. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Liu et al. User Experience Modeling for DASH Video. In IEEE Packet Video Workshop, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Mok et al. QDASH: a QoE-aware DASH system. In ACM MMSys, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sandvine: Global Internet Phenomena Report 2012 Q2. http://tinyurl.com/nyqyarq.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandvine: Global Internet Phenomena Report 2013 H2. http://tinyurl.com/nt5k5qw.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Netflix ISP Speed Index. http://ispspeedindex.netflix.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Sundaram, W.-C. Feng, and N. Sebe. Flicker Effects in Adaptive Video Streaming to Handheld Devices. In ACM MM, November 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Tian and Y. Liu. Towards Agile and Smooth Video Adaptation in Dynamic HTTP Streaming. In ACM CoNEXT, December 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Private conversation with YouTube ABR team.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: evidence from a large video streaming service

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on SIGCOMM
        August 2014
        662 pages
        ISBN:9781450328364
        DOI:10.1145/2619239

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCOMM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate45of242submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader