skip to main content
10.1145/2632048.2636076acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From today's augmented houses to tomorrow's smart homes: new directions for home automation research

Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

A considerable amount of research has been carried out towards making long-standing smart home visions technically feasible. The technologically augmented homes made possible by this work are starting to become reality, but thus far living in and interacting with such homes has introduced significant complexity while offering limited benefit. As these technologies are increasingly adopted, the knowledge we gain from their use suggests a need to revisit the opportunities and challenges they pose. Synthesizing a broad body of research on smart homes with observations of industry and experiences from our own empirical work, we provide a discussion of ongoing and emerging challenges, namely challenges for meaningful technologies, complex domestic spaces, and human-home collaboration. Within each of these three challenges we discuss our visions for future smart homes and identify promising directions for the field.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p105-mennicken.mov

mov

101.9 MB

References

  1. Abowd, G. D. What next, ubicomp?: celebrating an intellectual disappearing act. In Proc. UbiComp 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aldrich, F. K. Smart homes: past, present and future. In Inside the smart home, 2003, 17--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ball, M., & Callaghan, V. Managing Control, Convenience and Autonomy: A Study of Agent Autonomy in Intelligent Environments. In AISE series (2012), 159--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkhuus, L., & Dey, A., Is Context-Aware Computing Taking Control away from the User? Three Levels of Interactivity Examined. In Proc. UbiComp 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartram, L., Rodgers, J., & Woodbury, R. Smart homes or smart occupants? Supporting aware living in the home. In Proc. HCI--INTERACT 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bellotti, V., & Edwards, K. Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context-aware systems. Human--Comp. Interact., 16, (2001), 193--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1997) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brush, A. J., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Saroiu, S., & Dixon, C. Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities. In Proc. CHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bly, S., Schilit, B., McDonald, D. W., Rosario, B., & Saint-Hilaire, Y. Broken expectations in the digital home. In Ext. Abstr. CHI 2006, 568--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cakmak, M. & Takayama, L. Towards a comprehensive chore list for domestic robots. In Proc. HRI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S.. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proc. CHI 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chan, M., Estève, D., Escriba, C., & Campo, E. A review of smart homes---Present state and future challenges. In Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 91, 1 (2008), 55--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Chetty, M., Sung, J. Y., & Grinter, R. E. How smart homes learn: The evolution of the networked home and household. In Proc. UbiComp 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chetty, M., Tran, D., & Grinter, R. E. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proc. UbiComp 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Costanza, E., Fischer, J. E., Colley, J. A., Rodden, T., Ramchurn, S. D., & Jennings, N. R., Doing the laundry with agents: a field trial of a future smart energy system in the home. In Proc. CHI 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Yiu, C., Zimmerman, J., & Dey, A. K. Principles of smart home control. In Proc. UbiComp 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dey, A. K., & Sohn, T. Supporting end user programming of context-aware applications. IST PROGRAMME, workshop at CHI 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dixon, C., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Brush, A. J., Lee, B., Saroiu, S., & Bahl, V. The home needs an operating system (and an app store). In HotNets, 18 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In Proc. UbiComp 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Frohlich, D., and Kraut, R. The Social Context of Home Computing. In Inside the Smart Home, 2003, 27--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper, R. The Connected Home: the future of domestic life. London, Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Horvitz, E. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Humble, J., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Åkesson, K. P., Koleva, B., Rodden, T., & Hansson, P. "Playing with the Bits" User-configuration of Ubiquitous Domestic Environments. In Proc. UbiComp 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hwang, A., & Hoey, J., Smart Home, the next generation: closing the gap between users and technology. AAAI Technical Report FS-12-01, AI for Gerontechnology, AAAI Fall Symposium, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Intille, S. S. Designing a home of the future. IEEE pervasive computing, 1, 2 (2002), 76--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ju, W., Lee, B. A., & Klemmer, S. R. Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design. In Proc. CSCW 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kientz, J., Patel,S.N., Jones, B., Price, E., Mynatt, E. D., & Abowd, G. The Georgia Tech Aware Home, In Ext. Abstr. CHI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Koskela, T. & Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lee, M., Davidoff, S., Dey, A., & Zimmerman, J. Designing for control: Finding roles for smart homes. In Proc. Design & Emotion Moves 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Leppënen, S. & Jokinen, M. Daily routines and means of communication in a smart home. Inside the smart home, 2003, 207--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim, B. Y., Dey, A. K., & Avrahami, D. Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proc. CHI 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lim, B. Y., & Dey, A. K., Design of an intelligible mobile context-aware applications. In Proc. Mobile HCI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lynggaard, A. B., Petersen, M. G., & Hepworth, S. I had a dream and I built it: power and self-staging in ubiquitous high-end homes. In Ext. Abstr. CHI 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mainwaring, S. D., Chang, M. F., Anderson, K.. Infrastructures and Their Discontents: Implications for Ubicomp. In Proc. Ubicomp 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mennicken, S., & Huang, E. M. Hacking the natural habitat: an in-the-wild study of smart homes, their development, and the people who live in them. In Proc. Pervasive 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Mennicken, S., & Huang, E. M. Comment Cards, Home Sketches, and Family Personas. Eliciting Experiences with Home Technologies. In Proc. CHI 2013 Workshop on Studying Technology in the Home. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mozer, M. Lessons from an adaptive house (Doctoral dissertation), University of Colorado, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Norman, D., The 'problem' with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. In Human Factors In Hazardous Situations, Oxford University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Brien, J., & Rodden, T. Interactive systems in domestic environments. In Proc. DIS 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Pantofaru, C., Takayama, L., Foote, T., & Soto, B. Exploring the role of robots in home organization. In Proc. HRI 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rodden, T., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Koleva, B., Humble, J., Åkesson, K. P., & Hansson, P. Between the dazzle of a new building and its eventual corpse: assembling the ubiquitous home. In Proc. DIS 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rogers, Y. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing: Engaging UbiComp experiences. In Proc. Ubicomp 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Russell S. J., Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Schechter, S., The User IS the Enemy, and (S)he Keeps Reaching for that Bright Shiny Power Button! In Workshop HUPS 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Smart home market study: https://www.bsria.co.uk/download/asset/europes-smart-home-market-highly-concentrated-but-growing.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Stringer, M., Fitzpatrick, G., & Harris, E. Lessons for the future: Experiences with the installation and use of today's domestic sensors and technologies. In Proc. Pervasive 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Suchman, L. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C., Robson, D., Soto, B., & Barry, M. Making technology homey: finding sources of satisfaction and meaning in home automation. In Proc. Ubicomp 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Taylor, A. S., Harper, R., Swan, L., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., & Perry, M. Homes that make us smart. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 5 (2007), 383--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Tolmie, P. Pycock, J., Diggins, T., MacLean, A., and Karsenty, A. Unremarkable computing. In Proc. CHI 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Ur, B., Jung, J., & Schechter, S. The Current State of Access Control for Smart Devices in Homes. In Workshop HUPS 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ur, B, McManus, E., Ho, M. P. Y. & Littman, M. L. Practical Trigger-Action Programming in the Smart Home. In Proc. CHI 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Urban, B., Tiefenbeck, V., & Roth, K., Energy consumption of consumer electronics in U.S. homes in 2010. Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Vermeulen, J., Vanderhulst, G., Luyten, K., & Coninx, K. PervasiveCrystal: Asking and answering why and why not questions about pervasive computing applications. In Proc. IE 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Vermeulen, J., Slenders, J., Luyten, K., & Coninx, K. I bet you look good on the wall: Making the invisible computer visible. In Proc. AmI 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Woodruff, A., Augustin, S., & Foucault, B. Sabbath day home automation: it's like mixing technology and religion. In Proc. CHI 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Woods, D. D. Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity. Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 1996, 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang, R., & Newman, M. W. Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home. In Proc. Ubicomp 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Youngblood, G. M., Cook, D. J. and Holder, L. B. A learning architecture for automating the intelligent environment. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Zhang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. Design and evaluation of smart home user interface: effects of age, tasks and intelligence level. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28, 3 (2009), 239--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. From today's augmented houses to tomorrow's smart homes: new directions for home automation research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2014
      973 pages
      ISBN:9781450329682
      DOI:10.1145/2632048

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader