skip to main content
10.1145/2642918.2647369acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designer's augmented reality toolkit, ten years later: implications for new media authoring tools

Published:05 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Designer's Augmented Reality Toolkit (DART) was an augmented (AR) and mixed reality (MR) authoring tool targeted at new media designers. It was released in 2003 and was heavily used by a diverse population of creators for the next several years [28]. Ten years later, we approached a group of users to collect reflections on their use of DART, the artifacts they produced, their subsequent AR/MR authoring, their thoughts on the challenges of AR/MR authoring in general, and the state of modern tools. In this paper we present the findings from in-depth interviews with these DART developers and other AR experts. Their reflections provide insights on how to successfully engage non-technologists with new media and the challenges they face during authoring, the unique requirements of new media authoring, and how modern tools are still not meeting the needs of this type of author, highlighting where additional research is needed.

References

  1. Abawi, D., Dorner, R., Haller, M., & Zauner, J. (2004, March 15). Efficient Mixed Reality Application Development. 1st European Conference on Visual Media Production, London, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barba, E., Rouse, R., Bolter, J. D., & MacIntyre, B. (2010). Thinking Inside the Box: Meaning Making in a Handheld Augmented Reality Experience. The 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2010), Seoul, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, S. (2006a). Retrieved from http://apollobeyond1.blogspot.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, S. (2006b). Apollo Beyond Interactive Exhibit | Digital Frontiers Media, Retrieved May 16, 2012, 2012, from http://digitalfrontiersmedia.com/apollo-beyondinteractive-exhibitGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, R., Oikawa, M., Prasad, J., Unterberg, J., Liu, W., Cheok, A. D., & Kato, H. (2008). Augmented Reality for Artists and Designers. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008: emerging technologies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Billinghurst, M., Bowskill, J., Jessop, M., & Morphett, J. (1998, October 19--20). A Wearable Spatial Conferencing Space. The International Symposium on Wearable Computing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S., & Furness, T. A. I. (1998). Shared Space: An Augmented Reality Approach for Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Virtual Reality, 3, 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chastine, J., & Zhu, Y. (2008). The Cost of Supporting References in Collaborative Augmented Reality. Graphics Interface (GI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Conway, M., Audia, S., Burnette, T., Cosgrove, D., Christiansen, K., Deline, R., Pausch, R. (2000). Alice: Lessons Learned from Building a 3D System for Novices. CHI, The Hague, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. DART website (2014), from http://ael.gatech.edu/dart/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey, A. K., Salber, D., & Abowd, G. D. (2001). A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications. Human Computer Interaction(2), 97--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dow, S., Lee, J., Oezbek, C., MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J. D., & Gandy, M. (2005a, Jun 15--17). Exploring Spatial Narratives and Mixed Reality Experiences in Oakland Cemetery. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE '05), Valencia, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dow, S., Lee, J., Oezbek, C., MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J. D., & Gandy, M. (2005b). Wizard of Oz interfaces for mixed reality applications. CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI EA '05), Portland, Oregon. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dow, S., MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., & Bolter, J. D. (2004). Prototyping Applications for the Physical World Using Integrated Capture/Playback Facilities. In Extended Abstracts of Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UBICOMP04), Nottingham, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunser, A., Grasset, R., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). A Survey of Evaluation Techniques Used in Augmented Reality Studies. The International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Edwards, K., Bellotti, V., Dey, A. K., & Newman, M. W. (2003). Stuck in the Middle: The Challenges of User centered Design and Evaluation for Infrastructure. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '03). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. FLARToolkit. (2011). Retrieved Aug 24, 2011, http:// www.libspark.org/wiki/saqoosha/FLARToolKit/enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gandy, M., MacIntyre, B., Dow, S., & Bolter, J. D. (2006). Supporting Early Design Activities for AR Experiences. In M. Haller, M. Billinghurst & B. Thomas (Eds.), Emerging Technologies of Augmented Reality: Interfaces and Design (Vol. 1, pp. 160--180): IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, S., & Fitchett, C. (2001, November 11--14). Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces through Physical Widgets. The 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Orlando, Florida. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Guven, S., & Feiner, S. (2003, October 21--23). Authoring 3D Hypermedia for Wearable Augmented and Virtual Reality. The International Symposium on Wearable Computers, White Plains, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Klemmer, S. R., Li, J., Lin, J., & Landay, J. (2004). Papier-Mache: Toolkit Support for Tangible Input. The ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Klemmer, S. R., Newman, M. W., Farrell, R., Bilezikjian, M., & Landay, J. (2001). The Designer's Outpost: A Tangible Interface for Collaborative Web Site Design. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Klemmer, S. R., Sinha, A. K., Chen, J., Landay, J., Aboobaker, N., & Wang, A. (2000). Suede: A Wizard of Oz Prototyping Tool for Speech User Interfaces. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Landay, J., & Myers, B. A. (2001). Sketching Interfaces: Toward a More Human Interface Design. IEEE Computer, 34(3), 56--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Latulipe, C., Mann, S., Kaplan, C. S., & Clarke, C. L. A. (2006). symSpline: Symmetric two-handed spline manipulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ledermann, F. (2011). APRIL - Augmented Presentation and Interaction Authoring Language Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://studierstube.icg.tugraz.at/april/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, Y., Hong, J. I., & Landay, J. (2007). Design Challenges and Principles for Wizard of Oz Testing of Location-Enhanced Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(2), 70--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lin, J., Hong, J. I., & Landay, J. (2001). DENIM: An Informal Tool for Early Stage Web Site Design. CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J. D., Vaughn, J., Hannigan, B., Gandy, M., Moreno, E., Voida, S. (2003). Three Angry Men: An Augmented-Reality Experiment in Pointof-View Drama. The International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment, Darmstadt, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. MacIntyre, B., & Feiner, S. (1998, July 19--24). A Distributed 3D Graphics Library. SIGGRAPH, Orlando, Florida. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., Dow, S., & Bolter, J. D. (2004, October 24--27). DART: A Toolkit for Rapid Design Exploration of Augmented Reality Experiences. The 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '04), Santa Fe, NM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. MacWilliams, A., Reicher, T., Klinker, G., & Bruegge, B. (2004). Design Patterns for Augmented Reality Systems. The International Workshop Exploring the Design and Engineering of Mixed Reality Systems, Funchal, Madeira.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Oda, O., Lister, L., & Feiner, S. (2008, January 8--10). Developing an Augmented Reality Racing Game. Paper The International ICST Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, Mexico. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pair, J., Chastine, J., & Gandy, M. (2002). The Duran Duran Project: The Augmented Reality Toolkit in Live Performance. The International Workshop on Augmented Reality Toolkit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Piekarski, W., & Thomas, B. (2003, October 7--10). An Object-Oriented Software Architecture for 3D Mixed Reality Applications. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Tokyo, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Owen, C., Tang, A., & Xiao, F. (2003). ImageTclAR: A Blended Script and Compile Code Development System for Augmented Reality. The International Workshop on Software Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Presti, P., Gandy, M., MacIntyre, B., & Dow, S. (2005). A Sketch Interface to Support Storyboarding of Augmented Reality Experiences. The Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, California. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Qualcomm Augmented Reality SDK. (2011). 2011, from developer.qualcomm.com/dev/augmented-realityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinsland, K. (Writer). (2007). The Making of Woyzeck.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Reitmayr, G., & Schmalstieg, D. (2001). An open software architecture for virtual reality interaction. The Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Roth, A. (2011). The Arlab and Cave libraries: On authoring augmented reality and virtual reality experiences using a graphical programming language. The 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rouse, R. (2007). Woyzek: Augmented Reality Performance Installation and Master's Project. MA in Communication & Culture. Retrieved from http://www.rebeccarouse.com/uploads/5/7/8/1/5781195/woyzeckfinal_-_abcd.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Rouse, R., Lee, M. M., Padgett, B., & Shepard, K. (2007). Woyzek: Augmented Reality Performance Installation, An Augmented Reality installation presenting an adaptation of "Woyzek"). Toronto, ONGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmalstieg, D., Fuhrmann, A., Hesina, G., Szalavari, Z., Encarnacao, L. M., Gervautz, M., & Purgathofer, W. (2002). The Studierstube Augmented Reality Project. PRESENCE- Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(1), 32--54 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, D. (2007, November 1316). Experiences with Handheld Augmented Reality. The International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Nara, Japan Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Seichter, H., Looser, J., & Billinghurst, M. (2008, 15--18 Sept. 2008). ComposAR: An intuitive tool for authoring AR applications. The 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Warne, P., & Wozniewski, M. (2011). Farrago: AR Funkit for iPhone and iPod Touch: Hololabs Studio. Retrieved from http://farragoapp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Zauner, J., & Haller, M. (2004, June). Authoring of Mixed Reality Applications Including Multi-Marker Calibration for Mobile Devices. The 10th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designer's augmented reality toolkit, ten years later: implications for new media authoring tools

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
          October 2014
          722 pages
          ISBN:9781450330695
          DOI:10.1145/2642918

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UIST '14 Paper Acceptance Rate74of333submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          UIST '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader