skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702263acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Everyone Is Talking about It!": A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The deployment of technology interventions, such as public displays and mobile apps, in community settings has been found to engage people in sharing and comparing their opinions. Our research is concerned with how to extend this to community-wide participation by devising and deploying multiple voting devices and visualisations. We present an in-the-wild study where a number of shopkeepers along a street participated by placing a novel voting device in their shops to collect locals' opinions. Results were displayed outside the shops, on the pavement. This distributed set-up was found to promote public debate on local issues, particularly around the perceived divide between people on either end of the street. We outline our design process and describe the impact of distributing voting devices and situated visualisations in a local community. \

References

  1. Ananny, M., and Strohecker, C. Textales: Creating interactive forums with urban publics. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Behrens, M., Valkanova, N., Fatah gen. Schieck, A., and Brumby, D. P. Smart citizen sentiment dashboard: A case study into media architectural interfaces. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, ACM (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bird, J., and Rogers, Y. The pulse of tidy street: Measuring and publicly displaying domestic electricity consumption. In Workshop on Energy Awareness and Conservation through Pervasive Applications (Pervasive 2010) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, L., Rivera, J., Mello, J., Hindi, K., Lin, L., Patel, K., and Mathew, A. Skywords: an engagement machine at chicago city hall. In CHI Extended Abstracts (2013), 2839--2840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brignull, H., and Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT, vol. 3 (2003), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer, P. T., Hornecker, E., and Zoellner, C. Smslingshot: an expert amateur diy case study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM (2013), 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fortin, C., Neustaedter, C., and Hennessy, K. The appropriation of a digital speakers corner: Lessons learned from the in-the-wild deployment of mégaphone. Proceedings of 2014 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Foth, M., Choi, J. H.-j., and Satchell, C. Urban informatics. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2011), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gianluca, S., Milano, M., Saldivar, J., Nasir, T., Zancanaro, M., and Convertino, G. Agora2. 0: enhancing civic participation through a public display. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, ACM (2013), 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hosio, S., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Jurmu, M., Riekki, J., and Ojala, T. From school food to skate parks in a few clicks: using public displays to bootstrap civic engagement of the young. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2012, 425--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kriplean, T., Morgan, J., Freelon, D., Borning, A., and Bennett, L. Supporting reflective public thought with considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 265--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leong, T. W., and Brynskov, M. Co2nfession: engaging with values through urban conversations. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, ACM (2009), 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mehta, V. Look closely and you will see, listen carefully and you will hear: Urban design and social interaction on streets. Journal of Urban Design 14, 1 (2009), 29--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Moere, A. V., and Hill, D. Designing for the situated and public visualization of urban data. Journal of Urban Technology 19, 2 (2012), 25--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Müller, J., Wilmsmann, D., Exeler, J., Buzeck, M., Schmidt, A., Jay, T., and Krüger, A. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2009, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Putnam, R. D. Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Schroeter, R. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 227--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Simm, W., Whittle, J., Nieman, A., Portman, A., and Sibbald, J. Ourcity: Understanding how visualization and aggregation of user-generated content can engage citizens in community participation. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Steinberger, F., Foth, M., and Alt, F. Vote with your feet: Local community polling on urban screens. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, ACM (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Steins, C., Peschel, C., Warnke, D., and Borning, A. Playful civic engagement using large public displays.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang, A., Finke, M., Blackstock, M., Leung, R., Deutscher, M., and Lea, R. Designing for bystanders: reflections on building a public digital forum. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2008), 879--882. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Taylor, N., Marshall, J., Blum-Ross, A., Mills, J., Rogers, J., Egglestone, P., Frohlich, D. M., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Valkanova, N., Walter, R., Vande Moere, A., and Müller, J. Myposition: Sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, ACM (2014), 1323--1332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vlachokyriakos, V., Comber, R., Ladha, K., Taylor, N., Dunphy, P., McCorry, P., and Olivier, P. Postervote: Expanding the action repertoire for local political activism. Proceedings of 2014 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Webb, F. Tidy St: Shining a light on community energy efficiency. {On-line}. Accessed August 2014. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/ 2011/apr/12/ energy-use-households-monitor-electricity, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Whittle, J., Simm, W., Ferrario, M.-A., Frankova, K., Garton, L., Woodcock, A., Binner, J., Ariyatum, A., et al. Voiceyourview: collecting real-time feedback on the design of public spaces. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing, ACM (2010), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Everyone Is Talking about It!": A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader