skip to main content
10.1145/2733373.2806236acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What are Popular: Exploring Twitter Features for Event Detection, Tracking and Visualization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

As one of the most representative social media platforms, Twitter provides various real-life information on social events in real time. Despite that social event detection has been actively studied, tweet images, which appear in around 36 percent of the total tweets, have not been well utilized for this research problem. Most existing event detection methods tend to represent an image as a bag-of-visual-words and then process these visual words in the same way as textual words. This may not fully exploit the visual properties of images. State-of-the-art visual features like convolutional neural network (CNN) features have shown significant performance gains over the traditional bag-of-visual-words in unveiling the image's semantics. Unfortunately, they have not been employed in detecting events from social websites. Hence, how to make the most of tweet images to improve the performance of social event detection and visualization remains open. In this paper, we thoroughly study the impact of tweet images on social event detection for different event categories using various visual features. A novel topic model which jointly models five Twitter features (text, image, location, timestamp and hashtag) is designed to discover events from the sheer amount of tweets. Moreover, the evolutions of events are tracked by linking the events detected on adjacent days and each event is visualized by representative images selected on three predefined criteria. Extensive experiments have been conducted on a real-life tweet dataset to verify the effectiveness of our method.

References

  1. J. Bian, Y. Yang, and T.-S. Chua. Multimedia summarization for trending topics in microblogs. In CIKM, pages 1807--1812, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Bian, Y. Yang, and T.-S. Chua. Predicting trending messages and diffusion participants in microblogging network. In SIGIR, pages 537--546, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. Chen, D. Lu, M.-Y. Kan, and P. Cui. Understanding and classifying image tweets. In ACM MM, pages 781--784, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 39:1--38, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Q. Diao, J. Jiang, F. Zhu, and E.-P. Lim. Finding bursty topics from microblogs. In ACL, pages 536--544, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Geman and D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 6(6):721--741, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. H. Hsu, L. S. Kennedy, and S.-F. Chang. Video search reranking through random walk over document-level context graph. In ACM MM, pages 971--980, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Huang, B. Hu, H. Cheng, H. T. Shen, H. Liu, and X. Zhou. Mining near-duplicate graph for cluster-based reranking of web video search results. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 28(4):22:1--22:27, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Jiang, K. W. Leung, J. Vosecky, and W. Ng. Personalized query suggestion with diversity awareness. In ICDE, pages 400--411, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Khosla, B. An, J. J. Lim, and A. Torralba. Looking beyond the visible scene. In CVPR, pages 3710--3717, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Long, H. Wang, Y. Chen, O. Jin, and Y. Yu. Towards effective event detection, tracking and summarization on microblog data. In WAIM, pages 652--663, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In CIKM, pages 469--478, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Minka. Estimating a Dirichlet distribution. Technical report, MIT., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Munkres. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 5(1):32--38, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic. Learning and transferring mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks. In CVPR, pages 1717--1724, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Ramage, S. T. Dumais, and D. J. Liebling. Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In ICWSM, pages 130--137, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson. CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.6382, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. D. Roy, T. Mei, W. Zeng, and S. Li. Socialtransfer: Cross-domain transfer learning from social streams for media applications. In ACM MM, pages 649--658, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B.-S. Seah, S. S. Bhowmick, and A. Sun. Prism: Concept-preserving social image search results summarization. In SIGIR, pages 737--746, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X. Wang and A. McCallum. Topics over time: A non-markov continuous-time model of topical trends. In KDD, pages 424--433, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Z. Wang, P. Cui, L. Xie, H. Chen, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. Analyzing social media via event facets. In ACM MM, pages 1359--1360, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C.-C. Wu, T. Mei, W. H. Hsu, and Y. Rui. Learning to personalize trending image search suggestion. In SIGIR, pages 727--736, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Yang, Z. Zha, Y. Gao, X. Zhu, and T. Chua. Corrections to "exploiting web images for semantic video indexing via robust sample-specific loss". IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 17(2):256, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. H. Yin, B. Cui, L. Chen, Z. Hu, and Z. Huang. A temporal context-aware model for user behavior modeling in social media systems. In SIGMOD, pages 1543--1554, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. W. X. Zhao, J. Jiang, J. Weng, J. He, E.-P. Lim, H. Yan, and X. Li. Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In ECIR, pages 338--349, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. X. Zhou and L. Chen. Event detection over twitter social media streams. The VLDB Journal, 23(3):381--400, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What are Popular: Exploring Twitter Features for Event Detection, Tracking and Visualization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '15: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia
      October 2015
      1402 pages
      ISBN:9781450334594
      DOI:10.1145/2733373

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate56of252submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader