Oscar Tomico
ABSTRACT
Soft wearables include clothing and textile-based accessories that incorporate smart textiles and soft electronic interfaces to enable responsive and interactive experiences. When designed well, they leverage the cultural, sociological and material qualities of textiles, fashion and dress; diverse capabilities and meanings of the body; as well as the qualities and capabilities afforded by smart and programmable elements. Textiles behave in particular ways. They are part of culture. No matter a person's views on fashion or dress, they will have an intimate relationship with textiles, as they are one of the few products worn much of the time, close to the body. When designing wearables a designer must consider a range of requirements that do not typically demand focus when designing products that are not worn, including: a particular sensitivity for material details; an eye for fit and comfort on bodies with perhaps diverse and idiosyncratic movement capabilities; openness to a diversity of meanings that may be generated; and consideration of wearers' intimate relations with technology. In this paper we discuss the opportunities and challenges of designing and using soft wearables, applying notions of situatedness and personal meaning-making to understand and posit values in relation to outcomes. We present three design cases focusing respectively on body, material, and context; and reflect on how the different design approaches might impact use. Finally, we reflect on how embodied and collocated interactions might extend understanding of how to frame wearables research.
- Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational aesthetics. Paris: La presses du réelGoogle Scholar
- Clark, Andy. 2010. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Debord, G., & Wolman, G. J. 1956. A user's guide to déétournement. Retrieved 27 May, 2015 from http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/detourn.htm.Google Scholar
- Gärtner, C. 2013. Cognition, knowing and learning in the flesh: Six views on embodied knowing in organization studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management 29, 4: 338--352Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCarthy, J., Wright, P. 2007. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Presence Project. 2001. RCA: CRD Research Publications, London.Google Scholar
- Salter, Chris. 2010. Entangled. Technology and the Transformation of Performance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schön, D. A. The Theory of Inquiry: Dewey's Legacy to Education. Curriculum Inquiry. 22, 2: 119--139Google Scholar
- Shusterman, R. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheets-Johnson, M. 1988. The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Suchman, L. A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomico, O., van Zijverden, M., Fejér, T., Chen, Y., Lubbers, E., Heuvelings, M., Aïssaoui, S., Schepperheyn, V. Crafting wearables: interaction design meets fashion design. Proc. CHI EA '13. 2013. ACM Press, 2875--2876 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilde, D. A New Performativity: wearables and body devices. Proc. Re:live Media Art History. 2009. 184--190.Google Scholar
- Wilde, D. Swing That Thing : moving to move. PhD Diss., Monash University, Melbourne (2011).Google Scholar
- Wilde, D. Schiphorst, T. Klooster, S. Move to Design • Design to Move. Interactions 18(4):22--27 New York: ACM Press. (2011) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolf, G., Carmichael, A., Kelly, K. 2010. The quantified self. TED Retrieved 27 May, 2015 from http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Soft, Embodied, Situated & Connected
Recommendations
Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty's phenomenology
Special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction designIn 2001, Paul Dourish proposed the term embodied interaction to describe a new paradigm for interaction design that focuses on the physical, bodily, and social aspects of our interaction with digital technology. Dourish used Merleau-Ponty's ...
How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design
DIS '06: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systemsOur physical bodies play a central role in shaping human experience in the world, understandingof the world, and interactions in the world. This paper draws on theories of embodiment - from psychology, sociology, and philosophy - synthesizing five ...
Workshop on embodied interaction: theory and practice in HCI
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsFor over ten years researchers in human-computer interaction (HCI) have explored an embodied perspective that seeks to describe and explain the fundamental role played by the physical body in how we experience, interact with and understand computation ...
Comments