skip to main content
10.1145/2787622.2787711acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does Outreach Impact Choices of Major for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students?

Published:09 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, there has been a concerted effort to bring more diverse voices to the technology field, with much of this being done through outreach activities to girls and boys. Unfortunately, data demonstrating the long-term impact of outreach activities remains rare. To contribute to knowledge on the longitudinal effect of outreach programs, we used a quantitative methodology that followed a descriptive design approach to explore the impact of participation in outreach activities on the choice of undergraduate major. Of those surveyed, 45.3% of the 770 respondents recalled participating in these activities. The results indicate that these activities had a more positive impact on Asians and more negative impact on Hispanics. Blacks/African Americans were more likely to voluntarily participate in outreach activities than Hispanics, and whites were more likely to feel that they were a welcome part of the group than non-whites. The results also may indicate that when outreach programs are available in earlier grades, they are not reaching non-white participants to the same extent as white participants.

References

  1. Adams, J. C. 2010. Scratching middle schoolers' creative itch. In Proc of the 41st ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed. ACM, 356--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adrion, W. R., Fall, R. et al. 2010. Integrating evaluation into program development: benefits of baselining a NSF-BPC alliance. In Proc of the 41st ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed. ACM, 27--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Al-Bow, M., Austin, D., Edgington, J., et al. 2009. Using game creation for teaching computer programming to high school students and teachers. In Proc of the 14th ACM SIGCSE conf on Innovation and tech in comp sci ed (ITiCSE '09). ACM, 104--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andrews, G. R. 1994. 1993-1994 CRA Taulbee Survey. http://archive.cra.org/Activities/workshops/broadening.participation/cra/Taulbee/1993-1994.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Basawapatna, A. R., Koh, K. H. et al. 2010. Using scalable game design to teach computer science from middle school to graduate school. In Proc of ITiCSE '10 ACM, New York, NY, 224--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bell, T., Rosamond, F., Casey, N. 2012. Computer Science Unplugged and Related Projects in Math and Computer Science Popularization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7370, 398--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Benotti, L., Martínez, M. C. and Chapachnik, F. 2014. Engaging high school students using chatbots. In Proc of the 2014 conf on Innov & tech in comp sci ed (ITiCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, 63--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bruckman, A., Biggers, M., Ericson, B., et al. 2009. "Georgia computes!" improving the computing education pipeline. In Proc of the 40th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. ACM, 86--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Burge, J. E., Gannod, G. C., Doyle, M. et al. 2013. Girls on the go: a CS summer camp to attract and inspire female high school students. In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. ACM, 615--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Carter, E., Blank, G. and Walz, J. 2012. Bringing the breadth of computer science to middle schools. In Proc of the 43rd ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed (SIGCSE '12). ACM, New York, 203--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cavender, A. C., Ladner, R. E. and Roth, R. I. 2009. The summer academy for advancing deaf and hard of hearing in computing. In Proc of SIGCSE '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 514--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cheung, J. C. Y., Ngai, G. et al. 2009. Filling the gap in programming instruction: a text-enhanced graphical programming environment for junior high students. In Proc of SIGCSE '09. ACM, 276--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cottam, J. A., Foley, S. S. and Menzel, S. 2010. Do roadshows work?: examining the effectiveness of just be. In Proc of the 41st ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed (SIGCSE '10). ACM, New York, NY, 17--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Craig, A., Coldwell-Neilson, J. and Beekhuyzen, J. 2013. Are IT interventions for girls a special case? In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed (SIGCSE '13). ACM, New York, 451--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Craig, M. and Horton, D. 2009. Gr8 designs for Gr8 girls: a middle-school program and its evaluation. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 1 (March 2009), 221--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Creswell, J. W. 2008. Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Crutchfield, O. S. L., Harrison, C. D., et al. 2011. Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology: A Decade of Broadening Participation. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 3, Art 15, 24 pg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., Cutts, Q. I. et al. 2009. Enthusing & inspiring with reusable kinaesthetic activities. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 3 (July 2009), 94--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dahlberg, T., Barnes, T., Buch, K. et al. 2011. The STARS Alliance: Viable Strategies for Broadening Participation in Computing. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 3, Article 18, 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daily, S. B., Leonard, A. E., Jörg, S., et al. 2014. Dancing alice: exploring embodied pedagogical strategies for learning computational thinking. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, 91--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Doerschuk, P., Liu, J., and Mann, J. 2010. INSPIRED Broadening Participation in Computing: Most successful strategies and lessons learned. In 40th ASEE/IEEE Front in Ed Conf, Washington, DC, Oct 27-30, 2010, T2H-1-T2H-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Doerschuk, P., Liu, J. and Mann, J. 2011. INSPIRED High School Computing Academies. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Art 7, 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Doerschuk, P., Liu, J., and Mann, J. 2012. An INSPIRED game programming academy for high school students. 2012 Frontiers in Education Conf (FIE 2012), Seattle, WA, October 3-6, 2012, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Egan, M. A. L. and Lederman, T. 2011. The impact of IMPACT: assessing students' perceptions after a day of computer exploration. In Proc ITiCSE '11 ACM, New York, NY, USA, 318--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eglash, R., Krishnamoorthy, M., Sanchez, J., et al. 2011. Fractal Simulations of African Design in Pre-College Computing Education. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 3, Art 17, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ericson, B. and Guzdial, M. 2014. Measuring demographics and performance in computer science education at a nationwide scale using AP CS data. In Proc SIGCSE '14. ACM, New York, 217--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ericson, B. and McKlin, T. 2012. Effective and sustainable computing summer camps. In Proc of the 43rd ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed (SIGCSE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 289--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Feaster, Y., Segars, L., Wahba, S. K. et al. 2011. Teaching CS unplugged in the high school (with limited success). In Proc of the 16th conf on Innov and tech in comp sci ed. ACM, 248--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Franklin, D., Conrad, P., Aldana, G. et al. 2011. Animal tlatoque: attracting middle school students to computing through culturally-relevant themes. In Proc SIGCSE '11. ACM, New York, 453--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Freeman, J., Magerko, B. et al. 2014. Engaging underrepresented groups in high school introductory computing through computational remixing with EarSketch. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, 85--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Gasser, M., Yung-Hsiang Lu, and Cheng-Kok Koh. 2010. Outreach project introducing computer engineering to high school students. In 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2010), Washington, DC, October 27-30, 2010, F2E-1-F2E-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Goode, J. 2008. Increasing diversity in k-12 computer science: strategies from the field. In Proc of the 39th SIGCSE tech symp on Comp sci ed (SIGCSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 362--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Goode, J. and Margolis, J. 2011. Exploring Computer Science: A Case Study of School Reform. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Article 12 (July 2011), 16 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Guzdial, M., Ericson, B. J. et al. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proc of ICER '12. ACM, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Guzdial, M., Ericson, B., Mcklin, T. et al. 2014. Georgia Computes! An Intervention in a US State, with Formal and Informal Education in a Policy Context. Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 2, Article 13, 29 pgs. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Harriger, A., Magana, A. J., and Lovan, R. 2012. Identifying the impact of the SPIRIT program in student knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward computing careers. 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2012), Seattle, WA, October 3-6, 2012, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hart, M. L. 2010. Making contact with the forgotten k-12 influence: are you smarter than your 5th grader? In Proc of the 41st ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed (SIGCSE '10). ACM, New York, 254--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hulsey, C., Pence, T. B. and Hodges, L. F. 2014. Camp CyberGirls: using a virtual world to introduce computing concepts to middle school girls. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, New York, 331--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Isomöttönen, V., Lakanen, A. and Lappalainen, V. 2011. K-12 game programming course concept using textual programming. In Proc of the 42nd ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. ACM, 459--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kacmarcik, G. and Giral Kacmarcik, S. 2009. Introducing computer programming via gameboy advance homebrew. In Proc of the 40th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed (SIGCSE '09). ACM, 281--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Kafai, Y., Griffin, J., Burke, Q. et al. 2013. A cascading mentoring pedagogy in a CS service learning course to broaden participation and perceptions. In Proc of SIGCSE '13. ACM, New York, 101--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Kafai, Y.B., Searle, K., Kaplan, E., et al. 2013. Cupcake cushions, scooby doo shirts, and soft boomboxes: e-textiles in high school to promote computational concepts, practices, and perceptions. In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. ACM, 311--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Karp, T. and Schneider, A. 2011. Evaluation of a K-8 LEGO robotics program. In 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf (FIE 2011), Rapids City, SD, Oct 12-15, 2011, T1D-1--T1D-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., Antes, G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 96, 3, 118--121. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539417/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Lakanen, A. and Isomöttönen, V. 2013. High school students' perspective to university CS1. In Proc of the 18th ACM conf on Innov and tech in comp sci ed. ACM, New York, 261--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lakanen, A., Isomöttönen, V. and Lappalainen, V. 2014. Five years of game programming outreach: understanding student differences. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 647--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lakanen, A., Isomöttönen, V. and Lappalainen, V. 2014. Understanding differences among coding club students. In Proc of ITiCSE '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Lakanen, A., Isomöttönen, V., and Lappalainen, V. 2012. Life two years after a game programming course: longitudinal viewpoints on K-12 outreach. In Proc of SIGCSE '12. ACM, New York, 481--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lang, C., Craig, A., Fisher, J. et al. 2010. Creating digital divas: scaffolding perception change through secondary school and university alliances. In Proc of ITiCSE '10. ACM, 38--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Larkins, D. B., Moore, J.C., Rubbo, L. J. et al. 2013. Application of the cognitive apprenticeship framework to a middle school robotics camp. In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. 89--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lau, W. W. Y, Ngai, G. et al. 2009. Learning programming through fashion and design: a pilot summer course in wearable computing for middle school students. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 1 (March 2009), 504--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Layer, R., Sherriff, M., and Tychonievich, L. 2012. "Inform, Experience, Implement" Teaching an intensive high school summer course. 2012 Frontiers in Ed Conf, Seattle, WA, Oct 3--6, 2012, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Lewis, C. M. 2011. Is pair programming more effective than other forms of collaboration for young students' Computer Science Education. 21, 2 (June 2011), 105--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Liebenberg, J., Mentz, E. and Breed, B. 2012. Pair programming and secondary school girls' enjoyment of programming and the subject Information Technology (IT). Computer Sci Ed. 22, 3, 219--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Ludi, S. and Reichlmayr, T. 2011. The Use of Robotics to Promote Computing to Pre-College Students with Visual Impairments. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 3, Article 20 (October 2011), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Mano, C., Allan, V., and Cooley, D. 2010. Effective in-class activities for middle school outreach programs. In 40th ASEE/IEEE Front in Ed Conf, Washington, DC, Oct 27-30, 2010, F2E-1--F2E-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Marcu, G., Kaufman, S. J., Lee, J. K., et al. 2010. Design and evaluation of a computer science and engineering course for middle school girls. In Proc of SIGCSE '10. ACM, New York, NY, 234--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Maxim, B. R. and Elenbogen, B. S. 2009. Attracting K-12 students to study computing. In 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '09). San Antonio, TX, October 18-21, 2009, M1H-1--M1H-5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M. and Ben-Ari, M. 2013. Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Computer Science Education. 23, 3 (Sept 2013), 239--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Morreale, P., Kurkovsky, S. and Chang, G. 2009. Methodology for successful undergraduate recruiting in computer science at comprehensive public universities. In Proc SIGCSE '09. 91--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. National Center for Education Statistics. 2012. Digest of Education Statistics: 2012, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_263.asp?referrer=report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., et al. 2009. The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. In 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '09). San Antonio, TX, October 18-21, 2009, M2H-1--M2H-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Ouyang, Y. and Hayden, K. 2010. A technology infused science summer camp to prepare student leaders in 8th grade classrooms. In Proc of the 41st ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed. ACM, 229--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Pivkina, I., Pontelli, E., Jensen, R. et al. 2009. Young women in computing: lessons learned from an educational & outreach program. In Proc of SIGCSE '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 509--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Rheingans, P., Brodsky, A., Scheibler, J. et al. 2011. The Role of Majority Groups in Diversity Programs. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Article 11 (July 2011), 15 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Robertson, J. 2013. The influence of a game-making project on male and female learners' attitudes to computing. Computer Science Education. 23, 1(Apr 2013), 58--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Robinson, A. and Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. 2014. Underrepresented middle school girls: on the path to computer science through paper prototyping. In Proc of SIGCSE '14. ACM, New York, NY, 97--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Rodger, S. H., Hayes, J., Lezin, G., et al. 2009. Engaging middle school teachers and students with alice in a diverse set of subjects. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 1 (March 2009), 271--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Rosson, M. B., Ioujanina, A., Paone, T. et al. 2009. A scaffolded introduction to dynamic website development for female high school students. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 1 (March 2009), 226--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Roy, K. 2012. App inventor for android: report from a summer camp. In Proc of the 43rd ACM tech symp on Comp Sci Ed (SIGCSE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 283--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Searle, K. A., Fields, D. A., Lui, D. A. et al. 2014. Diversifying high school students' views about computing with electronic textiles. In Proc of the 10th conf on Int comp ed res (ICER '14). ACM, 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Sundaram, R. 2011.Set up and delivery of electrical and computer engineering projects at undergraduate engineering universities for outreach and partnership with K-12 STEM schools. In 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2011), Rapids City, SD, October 12-15, 2011, F4D-1--F4D-5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Taub, R., Armoni, M. and Ben-Ari, M. 2012. CS Unplugged and Middle-School Students' Views, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding CS. Trans. Comput. Educ. 12, 2, Article 8 (April 2012), 29 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Taub, R., Ben-Ari, M., and Armoni, M. 2009. The effect of CS unplugged on middle-school students' views of CS. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 3 (July 2009), 99--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. "Testing for Equivalence with confidence intervals or P values." GraphPad Software, Inc. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015 from http://www.graphpad.com/guide/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_testing_for_equivalence_with_c.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. US Census Bureau. 2006. Martin, Elizabeth. "Survey questionnaire construction." Survey methodology. 2006 (2006): 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Wart, S. J., Vakil, S. and Parikh, T. S. 2014. Apps for social justice: motivating computer science learning with design and real-world problem solving. In Proc of ITiCSE '14. ACM, 123--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Wagner, A., Gray, J., Corley, J. et al. 2013. Using app inventor in a K-12 summer camp. In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed (SIGCSE '13). ACM, New York, 621--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Webb, H. and Rosson, M. B. 2013. Using scaffolded examples to teach computational thinking concepts. In Proc of the 44th ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed (SIGCSE '13). ACM, New York, 95--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Webb, H. C. and Rosson, M. B. 2011. Exploring careers while learning Alice 3D: a summer camp for middle school girls. In Proc of the 42nd ACM tech symp on Comp sci ed. ACM, 377--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Welleck, S. 2002. Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Chapman and Hall, London/CRC, Boca Raton (in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pearson, K., et al. 2011. Computational Thinking and Expository Writing in the Middle School. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Article 9, 22 pgs. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Zimmerman, T. G., Johnson, D., et al. 2011. Why Latino High School Students Select Computer Science as a Major: Analysis of a Success Story. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Art 10, 17 pgs. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Zweben, S., Aspray, W. 2003 Taulbee Survey, May 2004, http://archive.cra.org/statistics/survey/03/03.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Zweben, S., Bizot, B. 2013. Taulbee Survey, May 2014, http://cra.org/uploads/documents/resources/crndocs/2013-Taulbee-Survey.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Does Outreach Impact Choices of Major for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '15: Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research
      July 2015
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450336307
      DOI:10.1145/2787622

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '15 Paper Acceptance Rate25of96submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader